期刊文献+

比较文学的轻与重——与张隆溪先生谈比较文学的发展 被引量:3

How Comparative Literature be Practiced:An Interview with Zhang Longxi
原文传递
导出
摘要 张隆溪认为比较文学不能挟理论以自重而忽视文学本身,只有回归文学的基本问题才可能重新确立比较文学的学科价值,中国的比较文学研究者完全不必把时间和精力花费在时髦理论的输入和“学派”的建立上,应该更多地专注于文学研究的基础工作并努力为整个人文学界撰写出优秀的著作,在此基础上还要积极主动地参与跨领域、跨语言和跨文化的对话与交流,只有如此才有可能获得外界的广泛承认和真正尊重。 Prof. Zhang Longxi pointed out that if we want to reassert the disciplinary research value of the comparative literature, we should not overemphasize abstract theories but attache less importance to the literature itself. For the comparative literature scholars in China there is no need to waste time and energy on the borrowing of novel theories and the establishment of "Chinese comparative literature schools". Instead, we should put more emphasis on the fundamental work of comparative literature studies and do manage to provide a lot of outstanding academic works for humanists. On this basis, we should try ac- tively to engage in the dialogues and exchanges among different disciplines, cultures and languages. Only in this way can we receive widespread recognition and genuine respect from outside.
作者 梁建东
机构地区 苏州大学文学院
出处 《中国比较文学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第1期64-71,共8页 Comparative Literature in China
关键词 张隆溪 比较文学的发展 Zhang Longxi development of comparative literature
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献9

  • 1See Ren6 Wellek, "The Crisis of Comparative Literature" ( 1958), in Concepts of Criticism,ed. Stephen G. Nichols ( New Haven : Yale University Press, 1963), pp. 282 - 95.
  • 2Susan Bassnett, Comparative Literature : A Critical Introduction ( Oxford : Blackwell, 1993 ),p.5.
  • 3Aldous Huxley, Texts and Pretexts :An Anthology with Commentaries ( New York:Harper and Brothers, 1933) , intro, p. 3.
  • 4Bassnett, Comparative Literature : A Critical Introduction, p. 47, See also Gayatfi Chakravorty Spivak, Death of a Discipline (New York:Columbia Universtiy Press,2003).
  • 5Claudio Guillen, The Challenge of Comparative Literature, trans. Cola Franzen (Cambridge,Mass. : Harvard University Press,1993), pp. 70-71.第86,87页.第70页.
  • 6Edward Said," Traveling Theory," in The World, the Text, and the Critic (Cambridge,Mass. : Harvard University Press, 1983) , p. 227.
  • 7Edward Said, "East Isn't East : The Impending End of the Age of Orientalism," Times Literary Supplement( 3 Feb. 1995 ).
  • 8.《走出文化的封闭圈》[M].北京三联书店,2004年..
  • 9Haun Saussy, "Postmodernism in China," in Great Walls of Discourse and Other Adventures in Cultural China( Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Asia Center, 2001 ), pp. 118-45.

共引文献5

同被引文献18

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部