世界范围内“模式”问题的四次论争及其启示

Four Disputes over the Issue of "Modes" Worldwide and Its Revelation

世界范围内"模式"问题的四次论争有:恩格斯的《反杜林论》批判杜林的世界模式论;是把苏联模式强加于兄弟党、兄弟国家,还是坚持社会主义发展道路的多样性;当代资本主义模式的多样性以及"华盛顿共识"对拉丁美洲、俄罗斯和东南亚的危害;西方国家关于是否存在、已否形成中国模式的论争。从这四次论争中得出以下启示:世界文明的多样性、各国各民族发展道路发展模式的多样性必须得到尊重;不能把一国的发展道路、发展模式奉为"普世价值"而强加于人;各国应当牢牢抓住符合自己实际情况这个基本点来构建自己的发展道路和模式;各国的发展道路和模式,不应以别国的价值标准去评判其是非;等等。

Four disputes over the issue of ‘modes’ worldwide are first of all Engel's Anti Duhring that criticized Duhring's world modes; to impose Soviet mode to brother parties and countries or maintain diversification of socialist developing road; the variety of capitalist mode and the harm of ‘The Washington Consensus’ to Latin America, Russia and Southeast Asia; the western dispute about where there has exsited the China mode. The four disputes brought such revelations as following: the variety of world civilization and the developing road of all countries and nations must be respected; the developing road and mode of a single country cannot be esteemed as 'universal value' and been imposed upon others; each country should firmly follow the road and mode that suits their own reality and should not use other's standard to evaluate the success or failure of their own.