期刊文献+

由客体到主体:民初女性婚姻权利的变化——以大理院婚约判解为例 被引量:4

From Object to Subject:Changes in Women's Marital Rights at the Early Nationalist Period Using Resolution Cases of Marital Disputes Handled by the Da Li Yuan
原文传递
导出
摘要 在传统的婚姻制度与习俗中,女性并非婚姻的主体,在婚约定立中,她们处于被安排的地位,在婚约履行中,她们是被强迫履行婚约义务的客体,在婚约的解除中,也是被双方父母争议的"标的物",这种状况直到民国初年的民事基本法仍然没有任何改变。但民国初年的大理院因受西方民法理念及国内妇女运动的影响,通过一系列判解对《现行律民事有效部分》的相关规定进行了一定的变通,这种变通使民初女性的婚姻权利体现出由客体而主体的变化趋势。 In traditional marriage system and practice,women were not subjects but only objects as they were assigned to their subordinate marital status in marriage agreements and forced to perform their duty in the implementation of marital agreements.In dissolution of marital agreements they were the targets of parents at either side,which did not change in the Civil Code of the early Nationalist period.However,the Da Li Yuan at the time was under the influence of western philosophy underlying the practice of civil code and the women's movements in the country and started to change its interpretation of the Effective Section of the Current Law on Civil Affairs in judgments,which indicated the rise of women's marital rights in a shift of their position from being the object to the subject of marriage.
作者 徐静莉
出处 《妇女研究论丛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第1期58-65,共8页 Journal of Chinese Women's Studies
基金 2009年教育部人文社会科学规划项目(项目编号:09YJA820012)"民初女性权利变化研究"的阶段性成果
关键词 民初 女性 婚姻权利 婚约判解 early Nationalist Period women marital rights resolution of marital disputes
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1[日]滋贺秀三著.张建国,李力译.中国家族法原理[M].北京:法律出版社,2003.476-484.
  • 2中华民国民法制定史料汇编[Z].台湾:司法行政部,民国六十五年.
  • 3天虚我生.大理院民事判决例(乙编民事二)[M].北京:中华图书馆,民国八年.
  • 4周东白.民刑诉状汇览(亲属)[M].北京:世界书局,中华民国十三年.
  • 5郭卫.大理院解释例全文[Z].台湾:成文出版社,中华民国六十一年.
  • 6刘俊文.唐律疏义笈解[M].北京:中华书局,1996.
  • 7吴兴凌,善清.民刑诉状汇编(已编)[M].上海:大东书局,民国十二年.
  • 8礼记·郊特性
  • 9怀效锋.大明律[Z].北京:法律出版社,1998.
  • 10田涛,郑秦.大清律例[Z].北京:法律出版社,1998:369.

共引文献11

同被引文献28

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部