期刊文献+

出租车特许经营权管制评析 被引量:6

Review on the regulation of taxi industry franchise
原文传递
导出
摘要 我国政府对出租车行业实行严格的准入管制,但基于自然垄断特性而对出租车行业进行准入管制的理由是不充分的。在特许经营权收益绝大部分分配给了出租车公司的情况下,政府管制使出租车公司获得垄断高价,并侵害到出租车司机与乘客的权益;出租车公司的高额利润导致非法营运增多,显然其收益与贡献是极其不匹配的。深层次原因是市场需求与准入管制的时滞性矛盾、出租车数量在空间分布上的不均衡及政府将新增道路上出租车的特许经营权完全无偿赋予了出租车公司。现阶段,在促进有效竞争的基础上实行管制创新就成为一个必然的选择。 Chinese government has implied strict access control on the taxi industry.However,due to the natural monopoly characteristics of the taxi industry,the reason for access control is not sufficient.In the case of the vast majority of franchise revenue allocated to the taxi companies,the government control makes the taxi companies establish high monopoly prices which hurt the interests of taxi drivers and passengers.The high profits of the taxi companies result in the increasing of illegal operation.It is apparent that the benefits and the contributions of the taxi companies don't match extremely.The deep-seated reason is that market demand and access control have time-lagged contradiction,the spatial distribution of taxi industry isn't balanced and the government gives the franchise of the new roads to the taxi companies completely free.Therefore,regulation innovation must be implemented on the basis of the promotion of effective competition.
作者 庄序莹
出处 《城市问题》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第1期70-76,共7页 Urban Problems
关键词 出租车行业 特许经营权 分配失当 管制创新 the taxi industry the franchise misallocation control innovation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献39

  • 1汤潇.中国城市交通问题三思[J].城乡建设,2004(7):37-38. 被引量:7
  • 2杨曾宪.更新理念,破解城市交通难题[J].上海城市管理职业技术学院学报,2006,15(2):46-49. 被引量:5
  • 3K·J·巴顿.城市经济学--理论和政策[M].商务印书馆,1984:119-122.
  • 4[1]De vany, A. S. Capacity utilization under alternative regulatory constraints: An analysis of taxi markets[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1975, 83: 83~94
  • 5[2]Douglas, G. W. Price regulation and optimal service standards: The taxicab industry[J]. Journal of Transport Economics and Polic, 1972, 20: 116~127
  • 6[3]Manski, C. F. and Wright, J. D. Nature of equilibrium in the market for taxi services [J]. Transportation Research Record, 1976, 619:296~306
  • 7[4]Hong Kong Government. The level of taxi services [Z].Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government, 1986~2000
  • 8[美]理查德·B·斯图尔特 沈岿译.《美国行政法的重构》[M].商务印书馆,2002年版.第21页.
  • 9王克勤.《北京出租车业垄断黑幕》[N].《中国经济时报》,2002年12月7日.
  • 10王小飞.《“我出钱买的车,产权为什么归公司”》[N].《南方周末》,2004年10月14日等.

共引文献114

同被引文献55

  • 1徐芳,王保庆.当前我国社会乞讨现象产生和发展的原因分析[J].湖南师范大学社会科学学报,2005,34(3):41-44. 被引量:8
  • 2杨小君,黄全.机动车牌照拍卖行为的合法性认识——解读《行政许可法》第12、53条的相关规定[J].行政法学研究,2005(4):109-115. 被引量:7
  • 3Frankena M.W. and Pautler P. A. An economic analysis of taxi- cab regulation [ R ]. New York : Federal Trade Commission, 1984 : 80 - 153.
  • 4Teal R. F. , Berglund M. , and Nemer, T. Urban Transportation Deregulation in Arizona [ R ]. Washington D. C. : Urban Mass Transportation Administration, 1984:7 - 29.
  • 5Schaller Bruce and Gilbert Gorman. Factors of Production in a Regulated Industry: Improving the Proficiency of New York City Taxicab Drivers[ J]. Transportation Quarterly, 1995 (4) :81 - 91.
  • 6Schaller Bruce and Gilbert Gorman. Villain or Bogeyman? New York's Taxi Medallion System [ J ]. Transportation Quarterly, 1996(1) :91 - 103.
  • 7魏倩.多地出租车承包金说法模糊,司机收入不敌“份儿钱”[N].人民日报,2011-10-13.
  • 8戴榆.上海出租车"份子钱"减负几何[N].每日经济新闻,2011-05-18.
  • 9林鸿潮.对出租车业政府管制政策的若干思考[J].今日中国论坛,2007(9):76-78. 被引量:7
  • 10郭玉闪.管制成本与社会公正-透过北京出租车行业看政府管制的失败[J].中国制度变迁的案例研究(第四集),2005:449-496.

引证文献6

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部