被盗文物跨国流转所有权争议法律适用规则探讨——兼论《涉外民事关系法律适用法》第37条被引量：5

A Study on Conflict Rules Applied to Cross-Border Transactions of Stolen Cultural Properties——Comment on Article 37 of Choice-of-Law Rules for Civil Legal Relationship Concerning Foreign Affairs or Nationals

下载PDF

导出

摘要文物由于具有稀缺性被视为保值增值的上佳投资品,因而其跨国流转日益频繁,不过其中相当一部分是被盗掘或盗窃后进入国际市场交易。不法分子利用各国所有权取得的种种歧异的规定,将非法获取文物的所有权"漂白"后转手给善意购买人,而最后的纠纷往往在原始所有人与善意购买人间发生。在相关国际公约在解决此类纠纷存在不足的情况下,应从国际私法法律适用的角度探讨解决上述问题的现实可行的方法,即:扬弃"物之所在地法"既有原则,引入文物最初来源地法,在平衡各方利益的基础上形成一套更具灵活性和综合性考量的法律适用方法。 Because of its scarcity, cultural property has been regarded as a good means of preserving value for investment. Consequently, cross-border transactions of cultural properties have thrived in recent days, but most of them are illegally evacuated or stolen by lawless persons and they transfer those cultural properties to bonna fide purchasers for the reason that there are various regulations concerning transition of ownership in different countries. Therefore, the ultimate disputes always arise between the original owners and the bonna fide purchasers. Although there are international conventions on this issue, those conventions can not cope with all the disputes efficiently. So the author puts forward a practical approach to solve this problem by private international law rules, namely, it is advisable to apply laws of the origin of the stolen cultural property instead of the lex si- tus. Also, the author put forward advice on modification of Article of Choice-of-Law Rules for Civil Legal Relationship Concerning Foreign Affairs or Nationals.

作者刘琳

机构地区湖南师范大学法学院

出处《时代法学》 CSSCI 2011年第1期104-108,共5页 Presentday Law Science

关键词被盗文物物权争议物之所在地法文物最初来源地法《涉外民事关系法律适用法》第37条 stolen cultural property dispute concerning property lex loci laws of the origin of the stolen cultural property article 37 of Choice-of-Law Rules for Civil legal Relationship Concerning Foreign Affairs or Nationals

分类号 D997.1 [政治法律—国际法学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献17

1Lisa J. Borodkin, The Economics of Antiquities Looting and a Proposed Legal Ahernative, 95 Colum. L. Rev. 377,377 ( 1995 ).
2Patty Gerstenblith, Acquisition and Deacquisition of Museum Collectibles and the Fiduciary Obligations of the Museum to the Public, 11 Cardo2o J. Int'l & Comp. L. 4-09,447(2003).
3Predita C. Rostomian, Looted Art in the U.S. Market, 55 Rutgers L. Rev. 271,271 -76(2002).
4Predita C. Rostomian, Looted Art in the U.S. Market, 55 Rutgers L. Rev. 271,271 -28(2002).
5Michael Kelly, Conflicting Trends in the Flourishing International Trade of Art and Antiquities: estitutio in Integrum and Possessio animo Ferundi/Luncrandi, Dick. J. Int'l. L. 33,44( 1995).
6UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects, Article 4 ( 1 ).
7UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects, Article 10 (3).
8郭玉军,靳婷.被盗艺术品跨国所有权争议解决的若干问题研究[J].河北法学,2009,27(4):16-21. 被引量：18
9李双元,周辉斌,黄锦辉.趋同之中见差异──论进一步丰富我国国际私法物权法律适用问题的研究内容[J].中国法学,2002(1):137-149. 被引量：16
10Derek Fincham, How Adopting the Lex Origin Rule Can hnpede the Flow of Illicit Cultural Property, 32, Colum. J.L. & Arts 111, Fall, 2008.

二级参考文献41

1Symeon Symeonides. A Choice-of-Law Rule for Conflicts Involving Stolen Cultural Property, 38 Vand. J. Transnat'l L. (2005). p. 1177.
2John Henry Merryman. The Good Faith Acquisition of Stolen Art, Stanford Public Law Working Paper, October 29, 2007. Available at http :// papers. ssrn. com/sol3/papers elm? abstract_id = 1025515.
3U. C. C. § 2 - 403. Power to Transfer; Good Faith Purchase of Goods; "Entrusting". Available at http ://www. law. cornell. edu/ucc/2/arti- cle2. htm#s2 - 403.
4Winkworth v. Christie Manson and Woods Ltd. and Another, [ 1977 W. No. 2296] ; 2 W. L. R. 937 (1980).
5Kunstsammlungen zu Weimar v. Elicofon, 478 F. 2d 231 (2d Cir)(1973).
6The Islamic Republic of Iran v. Denyse Berend, [2007] EWHC 132 (QB).
7David BAKALAR v. Milos VAVRA and Leon Fischer, 2008 WL 4067335 , 550 F. Supp. 2d 548 , 2006 WL 2311113 , 237 F. R. D. 59.
8Stato francese v. Ministero per i beni culturali ed ambientali e De Contessini, LXI Diritto di autore 263 (April-June 1990).
9Autocephalous Greek - Orthodox Church of Cyprus v. Goldberg & Feldman Fine Arts, Inc. , 917 F. 2d 278 (7th Cir. 1990).
10O' Keeffe v. Snyder, 405 A. 2d 840 (N. J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1979), rev'd, 416 A.2d 862 (N. J. 1980). Settled in 1980.