期刊文献+

基质效应对气相色谱法检测苹果和梨中有机磷农药的影响 被引量:9

Effects of matrix on analysis of organophosphorus pesticide residue in pear and apple by gas chromatographic methods
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以丙酮、梨基质、苹果基质配制15种有机磷农药混合标准溶液,用气相色谱-FPD检测器进行检测并对响应值进行比较;用基质匹配标准曲线对测定值进行校准,对得出的结果进行比较,以探讨基质效应对有机磷农药测定结果的影响。结果表明,所选用的15种有机磷农药均有不同程度的基质效应,其中甲胺磷、乙酰甲胺磷和氧化乐果的基质效应较强;同一种农药在梨和苹果中具有不同的基质效应,在不同品种的梨和不同品种的苹果间也具有不同的基质效应;不同农药在同一梨或苹果基质中具有不同的基质效应;应用基质匹配法绘制标准曲线能较好他消除基质效应对定量的影响;随着检测浓度的增大,基质效应的影响逐渐减小。 Fifteen kinds of organophosphorus pesticide standard mixture solution was confected in acetone,pear matrix and apple matrix,respectively.The organophosphorus pesticides were detected by GC-FPD and the response values were compared.The values were corrected by matrix-matched standard curve and the results were compared as well,which was used to explore the matrix effect on organophosphorus pesticide determination.The results showed that the 15 kinds of organophosphorus pesticides had different levels of matrix effects,and methamidophos,acephate,and omethoate had stronger matrix effects.The same pesticide in pear and apple had different matrix effects,different varieties of pear and apple had different matrix effects;Different pesticides in the same pear and apple had different matrix effects;The matrix-matched standard curve could decrease matrix effects on organophosphorus pesticide determination.As the concentration of detection increased,the matrix effect decrease gradually.
出处 《果树学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第1期97-101,共5页 Journal of Fruit Science
基金 农业部2009年无公害农产品质量安全监测项目"鲜食梨质量安全普查"
关键词 苹果 基质效应 气相色谱 有机磷农药 残留 Apple Pear Matrix effect Gas chromatography(GC) Organophosphorus pesticide Residue
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1贺利民,刘祥国,曾振灵.气相色谱分析农药残留的基质效应及其解决方法[J].色谱,2008,26(1):98-104. 被引量:149
  • 2HAJSLOVA J, ZROSTLIKVA J. Matrix Effects in (ultra)trace Analysis of pesticide residues in food and biotic matrices[J]. J Chromatogr A, 2003, 1000: 181-197.
  • 3MERCER G E. Determination of 112 halogenated pesticides using Gas Chromatography/mass spectrometry with selected ion monitoring. J AOAC Int, 2005, 88: 1452.
  • 4HILL A. Quality control procedures for pesticide residues analysisguidelines for residue monitoring in the European Union ,Doc2ument 7826/V 1/97[M]. Brussels: European Commission, 1997.
  • 5刘光学,乔雄梧,陶传江,等.NY/T788-2004.农药残留试验准则[S].北京:中国农业出版社,2004.
  • 6HAJSLOVA J. HALADOVA K, KOCOUREK V, POUSTKA J, GODULA M, CUHRA P, KEMPNY M. Matrix-induced effect: a criti- cal point in the gas chromatographic analysis of pesticide residue[J]. J Chromatogr A, 1998, 800(2): 283-295.
  • 7黄宝勇,欧阳喜辉,潘灿平.色谱法测定农产品中农药残留时的基质效应[J].农药学学报,2005,7(4):299-305. 被引量:96
  • 8MARTLNEZ-VIDAL J L, ARREBOLA F J, GARRIDO F A. Validation of a gas ehromatographic-tandem mass spectrometric method for analysis of pesticide residues in six food commodities: selection of a reference matrix for alibration[J]. Chromatographia, 2004,59:321- 327.
  • 9KOCOUREK V,HAJSLOVA J,HOLADOVA K. Stability of pesticides in plant extracts used as calibrants in the gas chromatographic analysis of residues[J]. J Chromarogr A, 1998, 800: 297-304.
  • 10MENKISSOGLU-SPIROUDI U, FOTOPOULOU A, ALBANIS T A. Matrix effect in gas chromatographic determination of insecticides and fungicides in vegetables[J], lnt J Environ Anal Chem, 2004, 84: 15-27.

二级参考文献92

  • 1黄宝勇,潘灿平,王一茹,曹喆,张微,李文明,江树人.气质联机分析蔬菜中农药多残留及基质效应的补偿[J].高等学校化学学报,2006,27(2):227-232. 被引量:59
  • 2Zrostlfkova J, Hajslova J, Godula M, et al. Performance of programmed temperature vaporizer, pulsed splitless and on-column injection techniques in analysis of pesticide residues in plant matrices[J]. J Chromatogr A, 2001, 937: 73-86.
  • 3Fernandez-Gonzalez C, Rial-Otero R, Cancho-Grande B, et al.Determination of fungicide residues in white grapes for winemaking by gas chromatography with mass spectrometric detection and assessment of matrix effects [J]. J AOAC Int,2003, 86: 1008-1014.
  • 4Albero B, Sanchez-Brunete C, Tadeo J L. Analysis of pesticides in honey by solid-phase extraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry[J]. J Agric Food Chem, 2004, 52: 5828-5835.
  • 5Anastassiades M, Mastovska K, Lehotay S J. Evaluation of analyte protectants to improve gas chromatographic analysis of pesticides[ J]. J Chromatogr A, 2003, 1015 : 163-184.
  • 6Gonzalez-Egea F J, Hemandez-Torres M E, Almansa-Lapez E,et al. Matrix-effects of vegetable commodities in electron-capture detection applied to pesticide multiresidue analysis [J]. J Chromatogr A, 2002, 966 : 155-165.
  • 7Cuadms-Rodriguez L, Garcia-Campana A M, Almansa-Lopez E,et al. Correction function on biased results due to matrix effects application to the routine analysis of pesticide residues [ J ].Analytica Chimica Acta, 2003, 478: 281-301.
  • 8Martinez-Galem M, Lopez-Lopez T, Gil-Garcia M D, et al. A comparative study of the correction of systematic errors in the quantitation of pyrethroids in vegetables using calibration curves prepared using standards in pure solvent [ J ]. Anal Bioanal Chem, 2003, 375 : 653-660.
  • 9Benijts T, Dams R, Lambert W. Countering matrix effects in environmental liquid chromatography-electrospmy ionization tandem mass spectrometry water analysis for endocrine disrupting chemicals[J]. J Chromatogr A, 2004, 1029: 153-159.
  • 10Department of Health and Human Services. Food and drug administration, guidance for industry on bioanalytical method validation[J]. Fed Regist,2001,66(100),28526(Docket No.98D-1195 ).

共引文献225

同被引文献51

引证文献9

二级引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部