期刊文献+

同时考虑决策单元竞争与合作关系的DEA交叉效率评价方法 被引量:31

DEA cross efficiency evaluation method for competitive and cooperative decision making units
原文传递
导出
摘要 为解决交叉效率方法中存在的多解问题,进取型权重与仁慈型权重方法被提出,所有决策单元要么同时被视为盟友,要么同时被视为敌对方,这并不完全符合各决策单元的个人意愿.因此,提出一种竞合DEA交叉效率方法,将所有决策单元分为若干组,各个决策单元的偏好权重能最大化盟友的总效率而最小化敌对方的总效率.这种权重选择策略体现了不同决策单元的个人偏好,故可以更方便地应用于实践中.最后,通过一个算例演示了这一方法. To eliminate the possible multiple solutions in the cross efficiency method,researchers proposed two approaches including the aggressive strategy and the benevolent strategy in which all of the other decision-making units are simultaneously treated as adversaries(allies) to the unit under evaluation. However,none of the strategy may accord completely with the individual preference of a specific DMU. Therefore this paper proposed a DEA cross-efficiency method considering both competition and cooperation among DMUs.All decision making units are divided into several groups.For a given DMU,its optimal preferential weights can maximize the aggregated efficiency of its allies and also minimize the aggregated efficiency of its adversaries.The proposed strategy allows for a specific DMU's individual preference in differential treatment to other DMUs,which makes it more applicable.Finally a numerical example is provided to illustrate the proposed approach.
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2011年第1期92-98,共7页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 国家自然科学基金创新研究群体科学基金(70821001) 国家自然科学基金(70801056) 中国科学技术大学青年科学基金
关键词 数据包络分析 交叉效率 竞争 合作 聚类分析 data envelopment analysis cross-efficiency competition cooperation cluster analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Banker R D, Charnes A, Cooper W W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis[J]. Management Science, 1984, 30(9): 1078 1092.
  • 2Fare R, Grosskopf S. A nonparametric cost approach to scale effficiency[J]. Journal of Economics, 1985, 87: 594~604.
  • 3Seiford L M, Thrall R M. Recent development in DEA: The mathematical programming approach to frontier analysis[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1990, 46: 7-38.
  • 4Adler N, Friedman L, Zilla S. Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 140:249 265.
  • 5Sexton T R. Data Envelopment Analysis: Critique and Extensions[M]//Silkman R H. Measuring Efficiency: An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1986: 73-105.
  • 6Doyle J, Green R. Efficiency and cross efficiency in DEA: Derivations, meanings and the uses[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1994, 45: 567-578.
  • 7Wu J, Liang L, Zha Y, et al. Determination of cross-efficiency under the principle of rank priority in cross- evaluation[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36: 4826-4829.
  • 8Wu J, Liang L, Yang F. Determination of the weights for the ultimate cross efficiency using Shapley value in cooperative game[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36: 872-876.
  • 9荆浩,赵希男.DEA中交叉效率评价的新思考[J].运筹与管理,2008,17(3):46-51. 被引量:14

二级参考文献23

  • 1吴杰,梁樑.交叉效率评价方法中新单元导入的保序性[J].系统工程,2006,24(7):111-115. 被引量:16
  • 2Wang Y M, Ying L. DEA efficiency assessment using ideal and anti - ideal decision making units[ J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2006, (173): 902 - 915.
  • 3Despotis D K. Improving the discriminating power of DEA: focus on globally efficient units[ J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2002, (53) : 314-323.
  • 4Kao C, Hung H T. Data envelopment analysis with common weights: the compromise solution approach[ J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2005, (56) : 1196-1203.
  • 5Tofallis C. Improving discernment in DEA using profiling[J]. Omega, 1996, 24(3) : 361-364.
  • 6Nicole A, Lea F, Zilla S S. Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context[ J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, (140) : 249-265.
  • 7Sexton T, Silkman R, Hogan A. Date envelopment analysis: critique and extensions[ ]. In: Siklman, R. H. (Ed.), Measuring Efficiency: An assessment of Date Envelopment Analysis. Jossey-bass, San Francisco, C A, 1986: 71-89.
  • 8Doyle J R, Green R. Efficiency and cross-efficiency in data envelopment analysis: derivatives, meanings and uses[ J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1994, 45 (5) : 567-578.
  • 9Doly J R. Multiattributes choice for the lazy decision maker: let the ahernatives decide! [ J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 1995. 87-100.
  • 10Green R H, Doyle J R, Cook W D. Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross-evaluation[ J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1996, (90) : 461-472.

共引文献13

同被引文献366

引证文献31

二级引证文献209

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部