期刊文献+

构建主体间性的投射小句系统——一项基于语料库和语篇类型的研究 被引量:8

The Projecting Clause System for the Construction of Intersubjectivity:A Corpus-based and Text-type-oriented Study
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文从社会–功能的视角出发,把使用语言表达意义看做实施社会互动过程,把主体间性看作语言使用者对社会交互双方的间接调控。在此意义上,文章首先论证了语言的投射机制对主体间性的构建作用。通过对两种语篇类型的平行语料库中构建主体间性投射小句的实证分析,依据交互双方在投射句中的"可见"程度,文章提出了一个构建主体间性的投射小句系统。同时,文章还描写了构建主体间性的投射小句系统中各类投射小句在不同语篇类型中的使用频率差异。文章认为,上述差异实际上表征了不同的语篇类型中的主体间性,说明主体间性与语篇类型之间存在一定的配置关系。 Taking a social-functional viewpoint, the paper interprets the process of meaning-making as the process of enacting social interactions, and intersubjectivity as the indirect regulation conducted by the language user over the interactant. From this viewpoint, the paper justifies the intersubjectivity-construction function of projection. Based on the observation of two parallel corpora of texts from two different text types, the paper proposes a system of intersubjectivity-constructing projecting clauses, taking into primary account the visibility of the interactant in the projecting clause. The paper then conducts a cross-text-type description of projecting clause types within the proposed system. Variations concerning frequencies are found across text-types. The paper argues that these variations suggest certain configurations between intersubjectivity and text-types.
作者 辛志英
机构地区 中山大学
出处 《中国外语》 CSSCI 2011年第1期44-50,共7页 Foreign Languages in China
基金 中国博士后科学基金资助项目(编号20100470973)
关键词 投射小句 主体间性 语篇类型 社会-功能视角 projecting clauses intersubjectivity text-type social-functional perspective
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Bhatia, V. K. World of Written Discourse: A Genre-based View [M]. London: Continuum, 2004.
  • 2Du Bois, J. W. The stance triangle [A]. In R. Englebretson (ed). Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction [C].Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2007: 137-182.
  • 3Fairclough, N. Discourse and Social Change [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
  • 4Freddi, M. Arguing linguistics: Corpus investigation of one functional variety of academic discourse [J]. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2005(4): 5-26.
  • 5Halliday, M. A. K. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language andMeaning [M]. London: Arnold, 1978.
  • 6Halliday, M. A. K. & C. M. I. M. Matthiessen. Construing Experience Through Meaning: A Language-based Approach to Cognition [M]. London: Cassell, 1999.
  • 7Halliday, M. A. K. & C. M. I. M. Matthiessen. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed) [M]. London: Arnold, 2004.
  • 8Harvey, A. Interaction in public reports [J]. English for Specific Purposes, 1995, 14: 189- 200.
  • 9Husserl, E. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology [M] (Trans by D. Carr). Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press, 1970.
  • 10Hyland, K. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interaction in Academic Writing [M]. London: Longman, 2000.

同被引文献108

引证文献8

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部