期刊文献+

不同治疗时机对新诊断癫痫患者复发和预后的影响 被引量:17

Influence of different treatment time on the relapse and prognosis of patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同治疗时机对新诊断癫痫患者复发和预后的影响。方法前瞻性收集155例新诊断癫痫患者的临床资料,根据治疗前发作次数,分为即刻治疗组(≤3次,84例)和延迟治疗组(〉3次,71例),给予合理药物治疗,至少随访1年(中位数29个月)。采用Kaplan—Meier生存统计分析比较治疗后第1次发作时间和治疗失败时间[因疗效不佳和(或)不能耐受副作用而退出者],同时比较2组患者观察期内“治疗失败”和“无发作”的比例。结果2组不同治疗时机癫痫患者第1次发作时间(即刻治疗组1484d,延迟治疗组1104d,x2=0.571,P=0.450)、治疗失败时间(即刻治疗组2992d,延迟治疗组1964d,X2=0.018,P=0.893)差异均无统计学意义;按病因(原发性、隐源或症状性)、年龄(儿童≤16岁,成人〉16岁)进行比较,2组差异亦均无统计学意义。观察期内即刻治疗组由于各种原因所致治疗失败患者20例(23.8%),延迟治疗组为16例(22.5%),差异无统计学意义(x2=0.035,P=0.852);观察期内达“无发作“患者即刻治疗组40例(47.6%),延迟治疗组30例(42.3%),差异亦无统计学意义(x2=0.447,P=0.504)。结论对于治疗前发作次数较少(≤3次)的新诊断癫痫患者,即刻治疗不影响其复发和预后。 Objective To explore the influence of different treatment time on the relapse and prognosis of patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. Methods To prospectively studied the clinical characteristics of 155 patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. Patients were separated into immediate (n = 84, seizures ≤3 times) or deferred (n =71, seizures 〉3 times) treatment groups according to number of seizures before treatment with appropriate antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). The patients were followed up for at least one year (median, 29 months). Kaplan-Meier survival statistics was used to analyze time to first seizure or time to treatment failure ( inadequate seizure control and (or) intolerable side-effects ). The proportions of patients with treatment failure and seizure free during follow up were also compared. Results There was no significant difference in time to first seizure or time to treatment failure between immediate (1484 days and 2992 days) and deferred treatment (1104 days and 1964 days; Log-Rank test x2 = 0. 571 and 0. 018 respectively, P = 0. 450 and 0. 893 ). Subgroup analyses according to etiology ( primary and cryptogenic/ symptomatic epilepsy) and age (children ≤ 16 years; adult 〉 16 years) did not reveal any difference between immediate and deferred treatment. During follow up, there were 20 treatment failure patients (23.8%) in immediate treatment group and 16 (22.5%) in deferred treatment group (no statistical difference, x2 =0. 035 ,P =0. 852). There were 40 seizure free patients (47.6%) in immediate treatment group and 30 (42. 3% ) in deferred treatment group ( no statistical difference, X2 = 0. 447, P = 0. 504). Conclusions For newly diagnosed epilepsy patients with a few seizures ( seizures ≤3), immediate AEDs treatment does not affect the relapse and prognosis.
出处 《中华神经科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第1期10-14,共5页 Chinese Journal of Neurology
基金 基金项目:南京市医学科技发展重大项目资助项目(2007-0211)
关键词 癫痫 药物疗法 复发 预后 Epilepsy Drug therapy Recurrence Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Hauser WA, Rich SS, Lee JR, et al. Risk of recurrent seizures after two unprovoked seizures. N Engl J Med, 1998, 338: 429- 434.
  • 2Randomized clinical trial on the efficacy of antiepileptic drugs in reducing the risk of relapse after a first unprovoked tonic-elonic seizure. First Seizure Trial Group (FIR. S. T. Group ). Neurology, 1993, 43: 478-483.
  • 3Prognosis of epilepsy in newly referred patients: a muhicenter prospective study. Collaborative Group for the Study of Epilepsy. Epilepsia, 1988, 29: 236-243.
  • 4Sillanp- M, Schmidt D. Early seizure frequency and aetiology predict long-term medical outcome in childhood-onset epilepsy. Brain, 2009, 132: 989-998.
  • 5Lindsten H, Stenlund H, Forsgren L. Remission of seizures in a population-based adult cohort with a newly diagnosed unprovoked epileptic seizure. Epilepsia, 2001,42: 1025-1030.
  • 6Glauser T, Ben-Menachem E, Bourgeois B, et al. ILAE treatment guidelines: evidence-based analysis of antiepileptic drug efficacy and effectiveness as initial monotherapy for epileptic seizures and syndromes. Epilepsia, 2006, 47 : 1094-1120.
  • 7Prognosis of epilepsy in newly referred patients: a multicenter prospective study of the effects of monotherapy on the long-term course of epilepsy. Collaborative Group for the Study of Epilepsy. Epilepsia, 1992, 33 : 45-51.
  • 8狄晴苏,凌璎.癫痫患者初次用药时机的选择[J].中华神经科杂志,2011,44(1):66-68. 被引量:7
  • 9Gupta SK, Satishchandra P, Venkatesh A, et al. Prognosis of single unprovoked seizure. J Assoc Physicians India, 1993, 41: 709-710.
  • 10Bora I, Seckin B, Zarifoglu M, et al. Risk of recurrence after first unprovoked tonic-clonic seizure in adults. J Neurol, 1995, 242 : 157-163.

二级参考文献28

  • 1Prognosis of epilepsy in newly referred patients: a multicenter prospective study of the effects of monotherapy on the long-term course of epilepsy. Collaborative Group for the Study of Epilepsy. Epilepsia, 1992, 33: 45-51.
  • 2Kwan P, Sander JW. The natural history of epilepsy: an epidemiological view. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2004, 75 : 1376-1381.
  • 3Elwes RD, Johnson AL, Reynolds EH. The course of untreated epilepsy. BMJ, 1988, 297: 948-950.
  • 4Bora I, Seqkin B, Zarifoglu M, et al. Risk of recurrence after first unprovoked tonic-clonic seizure in adults. Neurology, 1995, 242: 157-163.
  • 5Shinnar S, Berg AT, Moshe SL, et al. The risk of seizure recurrence after a first unprovoked afebrile seizure in childhood : an extended follow-up. Pediatrics, 1996, 98: 216-225.
  • 6Hui AC, Tang A, Wong KS, et al. Recurrence after a first untreated seizure in the Hong Kong Chinese population. Epilepsia, 2001, 42: 94-97.
  • 7Ramos-Lizana J, Aguirre-Rodrlguez J, Aguilera-L6pez P, et al. Recurrence risk after a first remote symptomatic unprovoked seizure in childhood: a prospective study. Dev Med Child Neurol, 2008, 51 : 68-73.
  • 8Berg AT, Shinnar S. The risk of seizure recurrence following a first unprovoked seizure: a quantitative review. Neurology, 1991, 41 : 965-972.
  • 9Kim LG, Johnson TL, Marson AG, et al. Prediction of risk of seizure recurrence after a single seizure and early epilepsy: further results from the MESS trial. Lancet Neurol, 2006, 5 : 317-322.
  • 10Marson A, Jacoby A, Johnson A, et al. Immediate versus deferred antiepileptic drug treatment for early epilepsy and single seizures: a randomised controlled triM. Lancet, 2005, 365 : 2007-2013.

共引文献6

同被引文献84

  • 1李鸿萱,张宸豪.癫痫的药物治疗现状[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2012,6(21):6823-6828. 被引量:6
  • 2冯力军.不同治疗时机对新诊断癫痫患者复发的影响[J].求医问药(下半月),2013(9):101-102. 被引量:1
  • 3中华神经科学会 中华神经外科学会.各类脑血管病诊断要点[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,6:379-379.
  • 4Balami JS,Chen RL,Grunwald IQ,et al.Neurological complications of acute ischaemic stroke[J].Lancet Neurol,2011,10(4):357.
  • 5Strzelczyk A,Haag A,Raupach H,et al.Prospective evaluation of a post-stroke epilepsy risk scale[J].J Neurol,2010,257(8):1322.
  • 6Menon B,Shorvon SD.Ischaemic stroke in adults and epilepsy[J].Epilepsy Res,2009,87(1):1.
  • 7Lin JJ, Mula M, Hermann BP. Uncovering the neurobehavioural comorbidities of epilepsy over the lifespan. Lancet, 2012 , 380 : 1180-1192.
  • 8Jackson DC, Dabbs K, Walker NM, et al. The neuropsychological and academic substrate of new/recent-onset epilepsies. J Pediatr, 2013,162 : 1047-1053.
  • 9Russ SA, Larson K, Hafon N. A national profile of childhood epilepsy and seizure disorder. Pediatrics, 2012, 129:256-264.
  • 10Adelw C, Andersson T, Ahlbom A, et al. Hospitalization for psychiatric disorders before and after onset of unprovoked seizures/ epilepsy. Neurology, 2012, 78:396-401.

引证文献17

二级引证文献78

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部