2Edwards SL, Wilson NA, Zhang LQ, et al. Two - part surgical neck fractures of the proximal humerus. A biomechanical evaluation of two fixation techniques. J Bone Joint Surg ( Am ), 2006, 88 ( 6 ) : 2258 - 2264.
3Cantu RV, Goval GJ. The use of locking plates in fracture care. J Acad Orthop Surg (Am), 2006, 14(2) :183 -190.
4Fulkerson E, Egol KA, Kubiak EN, et al. Fixation of diaphyseal fractures with a segmental defect: a biomechanieal comparison of locked and conventional plating techniques. J Tramua, 2006, 60 ( 7 ) : 830 - 835.
5Phistkul P, McKinley TO, Nepola JV, et al. Complications of locking plate fixation in complex proximal tibia injuries. J Ttamua, 2007, 61(1) :83 -91.
6Weinstein DM, Bratton DR, Ciccone WJ, et al. Locking plates improve torsional resistance in the stabilization of three - part proximal humerus fractures. Shoulder Surg (Br), 2006, 15(3) :239 -246.
7Hasenboehler E, Rikli D, Babst R. Locking cmpression plate with minimally invasire plate osteosynthesis in diaphyseal and distal tibial fracture: a retrospective study of 32 patients. Injury, 2007, 38 (5) : 365 - 370.
8Hazarika S, Chakravarthy J, Coopr J. Minamally invasive locking plate ostesynthesis for fractures of the distal tibia: results in 20 patients. Injury, 2006, 37 ( 6 ) : 887 - 887.
