1Dahaba AA, Prax N, Gaube W,et al. Haemodynamic and catechol- amine stress responses to the Laryngeal Tube Suction Airway and the Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway[J]. Aneasthesia,2006,61(4): 330-334.
4Asai T, Kawashima A, Hidaka l,et al. The Laryngeal tube compared with the laryngeal mask:insertion,gas leak pressure and gastric in- sufflation[J]. Br J Aneasthesia, 2002,89(5):729-732.
5Figueredo E, Martinez M, Pintanel T. A comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask and the laryngeal tube in spontaneously breathing anesthetize patients[J]. Anesth Analg, 2003,96(2):618-621.
4Asai T,Goy RW,Liu EH. Crieoid pressure prevents placement of the laryngealtube and laryngeal tube-suction II. Br J Anaesth, 2007,95 : 282-285.
5Genzwuerker HV, Altmayer S, Hinkelbein J, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of the new Laryngeal Tube Suction LTS II and the LMA-Proseal for elective surgical interven- tions. Aeta Anaesthesiol Scand,2007,51 : 1373-1377.
6Dahaba AA,Prax N,Gaube W,et al. Haemodynamic and catecholamine stress responses to the Laryngeal Tube-Suction Airway and the Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway. Anaesthsia, 2006,61 : 330-334.
7Cheng RB, Bing XH. Breathing and heart beating sudden stop by pneumohypoderma during laparoscopic pneumoperitoneum [ J ]. J Laparoscop Surg,2003, 8 ( 1 ) : 6.
8Huang LJ, Zhang WH, Que YM, et al. Two cases of serious pneumohypoderma caused by laparoscopic CO2 pnermoperitoeum [J]. J Clin Anesthesiol, 2003, 19(10) :599.
