期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

系统评价再评价的制作方法简介及相关资料分析 被引量：31

下载PDF
导出
摘要 系统评价再评价（overviews of reviews,简称Overviews）是全面收集同一疾病或同一健康问题的治疗或病因、诊断、预后等方面的相关系统评价,进行综合研究的一种方法。本文以Cochrane系统评价员手册5.0.2为基础[2],对Overviews的制作方法进行概述。
作者 刘雅莉 袁金秋 杨克虎 陈耀龙 杨曼
机构地区 兰州大学循证医学中心 兰州大学基础医学院 兰州大学第一临床医学院
出处 《中国循证儿科杂志》 CSCD 2011年第1期58-64,共7页 Chinese Journal of Evidence Based Pediatrics
基金 兰州大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助:lzujbky-2009-t12,lzujbky-2010-183 兰州大学2010教学研究项目:201022
关键词 COCHRANE系统 制作 健康问题 评价员
分类号 R-5 [医药卫生]
  • 相关文献

参考文献61

  • 1Becker LA.Umbrella Reviews:what are they,and do we need them? XIV Cochrane Colloquium,Plenary Sessions-Dublin,Ireland,2006.http://www.cochrane-collaboration.com/resources/videos/dublin_plenaries_home.htm.
  • 2Becker LA,Oxman AD.Chapter 22:Overviews of reviews.In:Higgins JPT,Green S,eds.Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.Version 5.0.2 (updated September 2009).The Cochrane Collaboration,2009.Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
  • 3海森堡,主编.范岱年,译.物理学和哲学:现代科学中的革命.北京:商务印书馆,1981.6-7.
  • 4Kramer S,Langendam M,Elbers R,et al.Preparing an Overview of Reviews:Lessons Learned.Cochrane Colloquium 2009 Virtual Posters.Available from http://www.cochrane.org/colloquium/2009/virtual_posters/?poster=9.
  • 5张俊华,商洪才,张伯礼.系统评价和meta分析质量的评价方法[J].中西医结合学报,2008,6(4):337-340. 被引量：53
  • 6Oxman AD,Cook DJ,Guyatt GH.Users' Guides to the Medical Literature.VI.How to Use an Overview for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.JAMA,1994,272(17):1367-1371.
  • 7Shea BJ,Grimshaw JM,Wells GA,et al.Development of AMSTAR:a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews.BMC Med Res Methodol,2007,7:10.
  • 8Atkins D,Best D,Briss PA,et al.Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.BMJ,2004,328(7454):1490.
  • 9Holger J Schünemann,Andrew D Oxman,et al.Chapter 12:Interpreting results and drawing conclusions.Version 5.0.2 (updated September 2009).The Cochrane Collaboration,2009.Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
  • 10Glenny AM,Altman DG,Song F,et al.Indirect comparisons of competing interventions.Health Technol Assess,2005,9(26):1-134.

二级参考文献12

  • 1Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, et al. Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM. 2nd ed. London: Churchill-Livingstone. 2000: 1-50.
  • 2Jadad AR, Cook DJ, Jones A, et al. Methodology and reports of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a comparison of Cochrane reviews with articles published in paper-based journals. JAMA. 1998; 280(3): 278-280.
  • 3Sunny Downstate Medical Center. Guide to research methods--the evidence pyramid, http://library. downstate. edu/EBM2/2100. htm.
  • 4Oxman AD. Checklists for review articles. BMJ. 1994, 309(6955) : 648-651.
  • 5Senn S. The quality of systematic reviews. Review is biased. BMJ. 2000, 321(7256): 297.
  • 6Sacks H, Berrier J, Reitman D, et al. Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. N Engl J Med. 1987; 316 (8) : 450 -455.
  • 7Sacks HS, Reitman D, Pagano D, et al. Meta-analysis: an update. Mt SinaiJ Med. 1996; 63(3-4): 216 -224.
  • 8Jadad AR, Moher M, Browman GP, et al. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on treatment of asthma: critical evaluation. BMJ. 2000; 320(7234) : 537 -540.
  • 9Altman DG, Decks JJ, Clarke M, et al. The quality of systematic reviews. High quality reporting of both randomised trials and systematic reviews should be priority. BMJ. 2000; 321(7256): 297.
  • 10Moher D, Jadad AR, Nichol G, et al. Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: an annotated bibliography of scales and checklists. Control Clin Trials. 1995, 16(1): 62- 73.

共引文献52

同被引文献380

引证文献31

二级引证文献389

中国循证儿科杂志
2011年 第1期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部