期刊文献+

产前诊断中胎儿新发生染色体异常的临床结局与遗传咨询 被引量:7

Genetic counseling and clinical outcome of fetus with de novo chromosomal aberrations
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析在产前诊断中胎儿新发生染色体异常的检测结果和临床结局,为胎儿新发生染色体异常的遗传咨询积累有价值的临床资料。方法2006年1月至2009年12月,在2583例产前诊断的细胞染色体核型分析中,共发现12例新发生的胎儿染色体异常,回顾性分析这12例胎儿的细胞和(或)分子细胞遗传学检测结果、产前超声检查结果、妊娠结局和出生后的随访结果。结果12例新发生染色体异常的胎儿有10例是非平衡性染色体异常,2例平衡性染色体异常。10例非平衡染色体异常的胎儿中有8例引产终止妊娠,有2例足月顺娩,其中l例是标记染色体异常出生后随访未见异常,另1例出生后随访至2周岁发现语言功能发育迟缓。2例平衡性染色体异常的胎儿均足月顺娩,出生后随访未发现异常。结论新发生染色体异常的胎儿表型可通过详细的染色体核型分析以及进一步的分子细胞遗传学检测所提供的染色体成分进行预测,产前超声结构畸形检查可为妊娠结局的评估提供有力的参考依据。 Objective To analyze the chromosome rearrangements and clinical outcome in fetus detected at prenatal diagnosis, and provide information for genetic counseling about de novo chromosomal aberrations. Methods From January 2006 to December 2009, we found 12 cases of de novo chromosomal aberrations in 2 583 cases of prenatal eytogenetic analyses and reviewed the karyotypes, other experimental analyses data, fetal ultrasound findings and clinical outcomes. Results Out of the i2 de novo chromosomal aberrations, 10 had unbalanced translocations and 2 had balanced reciprocal translocations. Eight of the 10 unbalanced translocation cases were terminated therapeutically, and 2 were delivered with full term. Neonates were phenotypically normal in the 2 cases with unbalanced translocations, but 1 had language retardation when followed up. The two balanced translocation cases were delivered with full term, and the neonates were phenotypically normal and clinical examinations were normal too. Conclusion Detailed eytogenetic and molecular study will be adjunctive tools for predicting the phenotype of fetus with de novo chromosomal aberrations. Fetal ultrasound examination will provide convincible demonstration to determine the outcome of pregnancy.
出处 《中华医学遗传学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第1期56-59,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics
基金 福建省厦门市科技计划指导性项目(3502220077069)
关键词 染色体畸变 产前诊断 超声 遗传咨询 chromosome aberrations prenatal diagnosis ultrasound genetic counseling
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Warburton D. De novo balanced chromosome rearrangements and extra marker chromosomes identified at prenatal diagnosis: clinical significance and distribution of breakpoints. Am J Hum Genet, 1991,49 : 995-1013.
  • 2Hook EB, Cross PK. Extra structurally abnormal chromosomes (ESAC) detected at amniocentesis: frequency in approximately 75000 prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis and associations with maternal and paternal age. AmJ Hum Genet, 1987,40:83-101.
  • 3Hume RF Jr, Kilmer-Emst P, Wolfe HM, et al. Prenatal cytogenetic abnormalities : correlations of structural rearrangements and ultrasonographieally detected fetal anomalies. Am J Obstet Gyneeol, 1995,173:1334-1336.
  • 4Cotter PD, Caggana M, Willner JP, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of a fetus with two balanced de novo chromosome rearrangements. Am J Med Genet, 1996,66:197-199.
  • 5Park S, Lee BY, Kim YM, et al. De novo chromosomal aberrations in the fetus: genetic counseling and clinical outcome. J Korean Med Sci, 2003,18:397-401.

同被引文献55

  • 1Warburton D. De novo balanced chromosome rearrangements and extra marker chromosomes identified at prenatal diagnosis: clinical significance and distribution of breakpoints. Am J Hum Genet, 1991, 49:995-1013.
  • 2Brady PD, Devriendt K, Deprest J, et al. Array-based approaches in prenatal diagnosis. Methods Mol Biol, 2012,838: 151-171.
  • 3Srehniak M, Boter M, Oudesluijs J, et al. Application of SNP array for rapid prenatal diagnosis: implementation, genetic counselling and diagnostic flow. Eur J Hum Genet, 20il, 19: 1230-1237.
  • 4Vermeesch JR, Fiegler H, de Leeuw N, et al. Guidelines for molecular karyotyping in constitutional genetic diagnosis. Eur J Hum Genet, 2007 ,15 :1105-1114.
  • 5Brondum-Nielsen K, Mikkelsen M. A 10-year surve:'', 1980- 1990, of prenatally diagnosed small supernumeraryI marker chromosomes, identified by FISH analysis. Outcome and follow- up of 14 cases diagnosed in a series of 12,699 prenatal;samples. Prenat Diagn, 1995,15 : 615-619.
  • 6Starke H, Nietzel A, Weise A, et al. Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (SMCs) : genotype-phenotype correlation and classification. Hum Genet, 2003,114:51-67.
  • 7Paoloni-Giacobino A, Morris MA, Dahoun SP.' Prenatalsupernumerary r (16) chromosome characterized by multiprobe FISH with normal pregnancy outcome. Prenat Diagn, 1998,18: 751-752.
  • 8Lichtenbelt KD, Knoers NV, Sehuring-Blom GH. From karyotyping to array-CGH in prenatal diagnosis. Cytogenet Genome Res, 2011,135 : 241-250.
  • 9Faas BH, van der Burgt I, Kooper AJ, et al. Identification of clinically significant, submicroscopic chromosome alterations and UPD in fetuses with ultrasound anomalies using genome-wide 250k SNP array analysis. J Med Genet, 2010,47:586-594.
  • 10Bui TH, Vetro A, Zuffardi O, et al. Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 3: is conventional chromosome analysis necessary in the post-array CGH era? Prenat Diagn, 2011, 31: 235-243.

引证文献7

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部