期刊文献+

经尿道前列腺切除术治疗晚期激素非依赖性前列腺癌可行性分析 被引量:13

Transurethral resection of the prostate for advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancer:A feasibility study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)在晚期前列腺癌并下尿路症状(LUTS)治疗中的作用。方法:对2004~2009年诊断为晚期前列腺癌合并LUTS的43例患者进行总结,分析TURP术前及术后3、12个月患者的IPSS评分、最大尿流率、以及疾病相关危险因素。结果:术后3个月,非雄激素依赖性前列腺癌患者的IPSS[(9.58±0.33)分]、最大尿流率[(8.96±0.47)ml/s]与术前[(19.60±0.41)分、(4.93±0.68)ml/s]存在显著差异(P<0.05)。随访12个月后IPSS[(15.73±0.66)分]、最大尿流率[(15.67±0.44)ml/s]与术前相比无显著性差异。多因素分析提示术前表现为急性尿潴留的患者术后预后相对较好,激素非依赖前列腺癌患者预后差。结论:TURP治疗晚期激素非依赖前列腺癌合并LUTS的患者,在短期内可以迅速降低IPSS评分,改善生活质量;远期效果不理想。同时,手术本身也可能带来相关并发症,降低患者生存质量。 Objective:To investigate the effect of transurethral resection of the prostate(TURP) in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer with bladder outlet obstruction(BOO).Methods:We included in this study 43 cases of advanced prostate cancer with BOO treated by TURP,and analyzed their IPSS,maximum urinary flow rate and relevant risk factors pre-operatively and at 3 and 12 months after TURP.Results:Compared with the baseline,IPSS and the maximum urinary flow rate of the patients showed significant differences 3 months after surgery([19.60±0.41] score vs [9.58±0.33] score,[4.93±0.68] ml/s vs [8.96±0.47] ml/s,P0.05),but not at 12 months([15.73±0.66] score,[5.67±0.44] ml/s).In multiple regression analysis,a good outcome was associated with pre-operative acute urinary retention,while poor prognosis with hormone-refractory prostate cancer.Conclusion:In the treatment of advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancer with BOO,TURP can reduce IPSS and increase the maximum urinary flow rate in the early period after surgery,but its long-term effect is not so desirable.Meanwhile the operation itself may bring about relevant complications and reduce the patient's quality of life.
出处 《中华男科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第1期55-58,共4页 National Journal of Andrology
关键词 激素非依赖前列腺癌 下尿路症状 膀胱出口梗阻 经尿道前列腺切除术 hormone-refractory prostate cancer lower urinary tract symptoms bladder outlet obstruction transurethral resection of prostate
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Bolla M, Collette L, Blank L, et al. Long-term results with immediate androgen suppression and external irradiation in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (an EORTC study) : A phase III randomized trial. Lancet, 2002, 360(9327) : 103-106.
  • 2Varkarakis J, Bartsch G, Hominger W. Long-term morbidity and mortality of transurethral prostatectomy: A 10-year follow-up. Prostate, 2004, 58(3) : 248-251.
  • 3GreenleeRT, Murray TI Bolden S, et al. Cancer statistics 2000. CA Cancer J Clin, 2000, 50( 1 ) : 7-33.
  • 4yon Rundstedt FC, Brandt AS, Lazica D, et al. Treatment of specific complications of locally advanced prostate cancer. Urologe A, 2008, 47 ( 11 ) : 1453-1459.
  • 5Mazur AW, Thompson IM. Efficacy and morbidity of "channel" TURP. Urology, 1991, 38(6) : 526-528.
  • 6Maiszalek M, Ponholzer A, Rauchenwald M, et al. Palliative transurethral resection of the prostate : Functional outcome and impact on survival. BJU Int, 2007,99(1): 56-59.
  • 7Haq M, Goltzman D, Tremblay G, et al. Rat prostate adenocarcinoma ceils disseminate to bone and adhere preferentially to bone marrow-derived endothelial cells. Cancer Res, 1992, 52 (17) : 4613-4619.
  • 8Mora Durban M, Navarro Sebastian J, Arrizabalaga Moreno M , et al. Transurethral resection of prostate cancer: Efficacy and morbidity. Arch Esp Uro1,1995, 48(8) : 829-835.
  • 9Okegawa T, Nutahara K, Higashihara E. Prognostic significance of circulating tumor cells in patients with hormone refractory prosrate cancer. J Urol, 2009, 181(3) : 1091-1097.
  • 10张小东,许克新,王晓峰,侯树坤.TURP在前列腺癌诊治中的作用评价[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2005,26(5):308-311. 被引量:36

二级参考文献13

  • 1Stephenson RA. Prostate cancer trends in the era of prostate specific antigen: an update of incidence, mortality, and clinical factors from the SEER database. Urol Clin North Am,2002,29:173 -181.
  • 2Horninger W, Reissigl A, Rogatsch H, et al. Prostate cancer screening in the Tyrol, Austria: experience and results. Eur J Cancer,2000,36:1322-1335.
  • 3Babaian RJ,Fritsche H, Ayala A,et al. Performance of a neural network in detecting prostate cancer in the prostate specific antigen reflex range of 2.5 to 4 ng/ml. Urology ,2000,56:1000-1006.
  • 4Roehl KA, Antenor JV,Catalona WJ. Serial biopsy results in prostate cancer screening study. J Urol,2002,167:2435-2439.
  • 5Djavan B,Mazal P,Zlotta A,et al. Pathological features of prostate cancer detected on initial and repeat prostate biopsy: results of the prospective European Prostate Cancer Detection study. Prostate,2001,47:111-117.
  • 6Pacelli A,Bostwick DG. Clinical significance of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in transurethral resection specimens. Urology, 1997,50:355-359.
  • 7Keetch DW, Catalona WJ. prostatic transition zone biopsies in men with previous negative biopsies and persistently elevated serum prostate specific antigen values. J Urol, 1995,154:1795-1797.
  • 8Onder AU,Yalcin V, Arar O, et al. impact of transition zone biopsies in detection and evaluation of prostate cancer. Eur Urol, 1998,33:542-548.
  • 9Niesel T, Breul J, Hartung R. Dignostic value of additional systematic prostate biopsies in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate. Urology, 1997,49: 869-873.
  • 10Zigeuner R,Schips L, Lipsky K, et al. Detection of prostate cancer by TURP or open surgery in patients with previously negative transrectal prostate biopsies. Urology, 2003,62: 883-8 87.

共引文献35

同被引文献95

引证文献13

二级引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部