期刊文献+

3.0T MR相位对比法测量正常人肺、体循环血流 被引量:7

Quantitative measurement of hemodynamics of pulmonary and systemic circulation in healthy volunteers with phase-contrast MR imaging on 3.0T system
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察3.0T MR相位对比法成像(PC-MRI)在体测量血流的准确性。方法 采用PC-MRI对15名健康志愿者的肺动脉主干、左、右肺动脉、主动脉、上、下腔静脉进行血流测量,计算各血管一个心动周期的平均血流量(AF)和反流分数(RF)。采用配对样本t检验分析肺、体循环血流差异。结果 肺动脉主干与主动脉的AF和RF差异无统计学意义,右肺动脉AF显著大于左肺动脉(t=3.092,P=0.004),左肺动脉RF明显大于右肺动脉(t=-5.502,P=0.001)。上腔静脉AF明显低于下腔静脉(t=-6.866,P<0.001),下腔静脉RF明显大于上腔静脉(t=4.250,P<0.001)。肺动脉主干、主动脉及腔静脉AF比为1∶1.009∶0.974(r=0.939~0.991,P<0.05)。结论 PC-MRI能够准确测量肺、体循环大血管血流量。 Objective To investigate the hemodynamic information of great vessels of pulmonary and systemic circulation by using phase-contrast sequence on 3.0 T MR system(3.0T PC-MRI) in vivo.Methods PC-MRI were performed in 15 healthy volunteers,and the blood flow status in main pulmonary artery(MPA),right pulmonary artery(RPA),left pulmonary artery(LPA),ascending aorta(AA),superior vena cava(SVC) and inferior vena cava(IVC) were evaluated.The average flow(AF) and regurgitation fraction(RF) of each vessel were calculated during one cardiac cycle.Paired-samples t-test was employed for statistical assessment.Results No significant difference was found in AF and RF between MPA and AA.AF of RPA was significantly higher than that of LPA(t=3.092,P=0.004),while RF of RPA was significantly lower than that of LPA(t=-5.502,P=0.001).AF of SVC was significantly lower than that of IVC(t=-6.866,P0.001),while RF of IVC was significantly higher than that of SVC(t=4.250,P0.001).High correlation(r=0.939—0.991) among AF of MPA,AA and vena cava were found and the ratio of the three was 1∶1.009∶0.974.Conclusion The average flow of great vessels of pulmonary circulation and systemic circulation can be accurately measured with PC-MRI.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2011年第1期61-65,共5页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
关键词 磁共振成像 血流动力学 相位对比序列 Magnetic resonance imaging Hemodynamics Phase contrast sequence
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Gatehouse PD, Keegan J, Crowe LA, et al. Applications of phase-contrast flow and velocity imaging in cardiovascular MRI. Eur Radiol, 2005,15(10) :2172-2184.
  • 2Chai P, Mohiaddin R. How we perform cardiovascular magnetic resonance flow assessment using phase-contrast velocity mapping. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2005,7(4):705-716.
  • 3雷晓燕,郭佑民,许贵平,陈敏,李润民,杨健.中心肺动脉血流速度的MRI测量研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2006,22(3):409-412. 被引量:2
  • 4雷晓燕,沈亚梅,郭佑民,陈敏,杨健,徐桂平.肺动脉流速的MRI测量与多普勒超声比较研究[J].实用放射学杂志,2006,22(1):27-29. 被引量:5
  • 5Markl M, Harloff A, Bley TA, et al. Time-resolved 3D MR velocity mapping at 3T: improved navigator-gated assessment of vascular anatomy and blood flow. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2007, 25(4) :824-831.
  • 6Goo HW, Al-Otay A, Grosse Wortmann L, et al. Phase-contrast magnetic resonance quantification of normal pulmonary venous re turn. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2009,29(3):588-594.
  • 7Harris MA, Weinberg PM, Whitehead KK, et al. Usefulness of branch pulmonary artery regurgitant fraction to estimate the relative right and left pulmonary vascular resistances in congenital heart disease. Am J Cardiol, 2005,95(12) : 1514-1517.
  • 8Markl M, Draney MT, Miller DC, et al. Time resolved three-dimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping of aortic flow in healthy volunteers and patients after valve-sparing aortic root re placement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2005, 130(2) :456-463.
  • 9Kang IS, Redington AN, Benson LN, et al. Differential regurgi tation in branch pulmonary arteries after repair of tetralogy of Fallot: a phase-contrast cine magnetic resonance study. Circulation, 2003,107(23):2938-2943.
  • 10Bell A, Beerbaum P Greil G, et al. Noninvasive assessment of pulmonary artery flow and resistance by cardiac magnetic resonance in congenital heart diseases with unrestricted left to right shunt. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2009,2(11):1285-1291.

二级参考文献13

  • 1李永忠,李坤成,赵希刚,赵虹.MRI对肺动脉栓塞血液动力学评价的初步研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2004,38(11):1158-1163. 被引量:20
  • 2Hundley WG, Li HF, Hillis LD, et al. Quantitation of cardiac output with velocity- encoded, phase- difference magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Am J Cardiol, 1995,75(17): 1250-1255.
  • 3Flamm S, Moodie DS. Advances in magnetic resonance imaging: cine MR1 and flow velocity mapping[J]. Progr Pediatr Cardiol, 1997, 7(1): 117-129.
  • 4Moser KW, Ragaln LG, Georgladls, JG. Synchronized EPI phase contrast velocimetry in a mixing reactor[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging,2003, 21(1): 127-133.
  • 5Sloth E, Pedersen EM, Egeblad H, et al, Transesophageal multiplane imaging of the human pulmonary artery: a comparison of MRI and multiplane transesophageal two - dimensional echocardiography[J]. Cardiovasc Res, 1997, 34(2): 582-589.
  • 6Geva T,Sahn DJ,Powell AJ.Magnetic resonance imaging of congenital heart disease in adults[J].Progress in Pediatric Cardiology,2003,17(1):21-39.
  • 7Lotz J,Meier C,Leppert A,et al.Cardiovascular flow measurement with phase-contrast MR imaging:basic facts and implementation[J].Radiographics,2002,22(3):651-671.
  • 8Bergin CJ,Sirlin CB,Hauschildt JP,et al.Chronic thromboembolism:diagnosis with helical CT and MR imaging with angiographic and surgical correlation[J].Radiology,1997,204(3):695-702.
  • 9Gupta A,Frazer CK,Ferguson JM,et al.Acute pulmonary embolism:Diagnosis with MR angiography[J].Radiology,1999,210(2):353-359.
  • 10Hundley WG,Li HF,Hillis LD,et al.Quantitation of cardiac output with velocity-encoded,phase-difference magnetic resonance imaging[J].The American Journal of Cardiology,1995,75(17):1250-1255.

共引文献5

同被引文献66

引证文献7

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部