期刊文献+

腰椎后路单Cage单侧椎体间融合术在腰椎退变性疾病中的应用 被引量:3

Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using a unilateral single cage in the degenerative lumbar spine
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对单Cage单侧PLIF治疗腰椎退变性疾病的临床疗效及放射影像学结果进行回顾性分析。方法 2005年10月至2008年3月间,使用填有移植骨的单Cage单侧PLIF技术为55例腰椎退变性疾病患者施行手术,术中将腰椎后路减压所取下的骨块咬碎后填于Cage前方,术后平均随访39.2个月。使用VAS法对患者的术前、术后1年及末次随访进行临床评估,用ODI法对术前及末次随访的功能进行评估,在末次随访中使用Prolo评分法,放射影像学可通过椎间高度、Cage周围的骨桥、射线透亮区及过伸过屈侧位片上椎间不稳的表现来评估。结果 VAS评分、ODI指数、Prolo评分均表明该术式的临床疗效非常令人满意,放射影像学评估显示术后6月时55例中有96.4%(53例)获牢固融合,末次随访时所有病例均获得完全融合。结论单Cage单侧PLIF治疗腰椎退变性疾病,能维持合适的椎间高度,有可靠的脊柱稳定性、良好的骨连接和较高的骨融合率,可获得令人满意的临床疗效和放射影像学结果。 Objective We retrospectively evaluated the clinical and radiological outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) using a unilateral single cage and a local morselized bone graft. Methods Fifty five patients who underwent PLIF with a unilateral single cage filled with local morselized bone graft were enrolled in this study. The average follow-up duration was 39.2 months. The clinical outcomes were evaluated with the visual analogue scale (VAS) at the pre-operative period, at 1 year post-operation and at the final follow-up, the Oswestry Disability Index and the Prolo scale at the final follow-up; the radiological outcomes were evaluated according to the change of bone bridging, the radiolucency, the instability and the disc height. Re,tits For the clinical evaluation, the VAS pain index, the Oswestry Disability Index and the Prolo scale showed excellent outcomes. For the radiological evaluation, 55 cases showed complete bone union at the final follow-up. Conclusion PLIF using a unilateral single cage filled with a local morselized bone graft for treating degenerative lumbar spine disease provides excellent outcomes according to the clinical and radiological evaluation.
出处 《中国临床解剖学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2011年第1期100-104,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy
关键词 脊柱融合术 腰椎后路椎体间融合术 单侧单CAGE椎间融合术 局部自体骨植骨 Spinal fusion Posterior lumbar interbody fusion Unilateral single cage Local morselized graft
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献9

  • 1Deyo RA,Battie M,Beurskens AJ,et al.Outcome measures for low back pain research:a proposal for standardized use[J].Spine,1998,23:2003-2013.
  • 2Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry disability index[J].Spine,2000,25:2940-2953.
  • 3Fritz JM,Irrgang JJ.A comparison of a modified Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire and the quebec back pain disability Scale[J].Phys Ther,2001,81:776-788.
  • 4Fairbank JC,Couper J,Davies JB,et al.The oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire[J].Physiotherapy,1980,66:271-273.
  • 5Schoppink LE,Van Tulder MW,Koes BW,et al.Reliability and validity of the Dutch adaptation of the quebec back pain disability scale[J].Phys Ther,1996,76:268-275.
  • 6Kopec JA,Esdaile JM,Abrahamowicz M,et al.The quebec back pain disability scale:measurement properties[J].Spine,1995,20:341-352.
  • 7Triano JJ,McGregor M,Hondras MA,et al.Manipulative therapy versus education programs in chronic low back pain[J].Spine,1995,20:948-955.
  • 8杨连发,李子荣,岳德波,张念非,吴宇光.腰椎间盘突出症手术疗效预测因素[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2000,10(1):18-22. 被引量:59
  • 9张年春,周军海,梅芳瑞.腰椎间盘突出症的手术和非手术治疗94例对比研究[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2000,10(1):41-43. 被引量:29

共引文献563

同被引文献39

引证文献3

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部