摘要
目的评价改良切口治疗跟骨关节内骨折的临床疗效。方法采用回顾性研究,我科自2005年1月~2008年12月行跟骨关节内骨折手术75侧,其中41侧使用传统跟骨外侧L形切口,34侧使用改良切口。用SPSS17.0对两者的手术时间、切口长度、切口并发症发生率、B hler角、Gissane角、AOFAS评分做统计学处理。结果两者在手术时间、切口长度、切口并发症发生率P〈0.05,有统计学意义,在B hler角、Gissane角、AOFAS评分P〉0.05,无统计学意义。结论改良切口不但在恢复跟骨解剖结构(B hler角及Gissane角)及关节功能(AOFAS评分)上可以取得和传统切口相同的临床效果,而且可以减少手术时间、切口长度、切口并发症发生率。
Objective To evaluate the clinical effects of modified incision and traditional incision in the treatment of intra-articular calcanea fractures.Methods Seventy-five cases of intra-articular calcaneal fracture were treated with open reduction and interal fixtion by a plate from January 2005 to December 2008.Thirty-four cases were treated with modified incision and 41 cases with traditional incision.Six items of the two groups were evaluated by SPSS17.0: operating time,incision length,incision complication rate,Bhler's angle,Gissane's angle and AOFAS score.Results There was significant difference in operating time,incision length and incision complication rate between the two groups(P0.05),but there was no significant difference in Bhler's angle,Gissane's angle and AOFAS score(P0.05).Conclusion The modified incision not only can achieve the same clinical effects to the traditional incision in reconstructing the calcaneal anatomic structure and recovering excellent weight-bearing function but also can reduce operating time,incision length and incision complication rate.
出处
《骨科》
CAS
2011年第1期26-28,共3页
ORTHOPAEDICS
关键词
骨折
跟骨
关节
Fractures
Calcaneus
Joints