期刊文献+

后霸权理论及其当代意义 被引量:2

Post-hegemony Theory and It's Contemporary Significance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 霸权曾经是政治文化的一个核心概念,但随着世界全球化进程的迅速推进,国家权力控制的新发展以及世界范围内新社会运动的蓬勃发展,人们开始对霸权理论提出了质疑和反思,"后霸权"(post-hegemony)概念应时提出。后霸权概念使我们更为深入和全面地理解当今这个飞速发展的世界,但后霸权理论不应被看作是对霸权理论的颠覆和否定,而应是对霸权理论的丰富和发展。当今世界依然存在着霸权与反霸权的斗争,而且还将继续下去,这是我们所必须关注的。 Hegemony once was a core concept of the political culture,but which has been questioned with the globalization process of the world,the new developing of state power control and the booming of the new social movements.As such,the concept of post-hegemony was put forward.Post-hegemony,on the one hand,can make us more in-depth and comprehensively understand the world.On the other hand,it should not be viewed as a subversion or negative of hegemony theory.Post-hegemony is the development of the hegemony theory.All in all,there are still hegemony and counterhegemony struggles in the world and which will go on and on.So we should understand the world in terms of combining hegemony and post-hegemony.
作者 和磊
出处 《社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第2期22-30,共9页 Journal of Social Sciences
关键词 后霸权 文化研究 葛兰西 Post-hegemony Cultural Studies Gramsci
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Richard J, F. Day, Gramsci is Dead : Anarchist Currents in the Newest Social Movements, London : Pluto Press, 2005, p. 203.
  • 2ChrisBarker.《文化研究智典》,许梦芸译,韦伯文化国际出版有限公司2006年版,第108页.
  • 3Scott Lash, "Power after Hegemony: Culture Studies In Mutation", in Theory, Culture & Society, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2007.
  • 4Jeremy Valentine, "The hegemony of hegemony", History of the Human Sciences, February 2001, Vol. 14 No. 1, notes 4.
  • 5李滨.国际政治经济学的葛兰西学派[J].欧洲,2000,18(1):20-30. 被引量:8
  • 6Tony Bennett, "Popular Culture and the 'Turn to Gramsci' ", in Tony Bennett et al. (eds.) , Popular Culture and Social Relation, Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1976, pp. xi -xix.
  • 7Jeremy Valentine, "The hegemony of hegemony" ,History of the Human Sciences, vol. 14, No. 1, 2001.
  • 8Bron Tamulis, "The Hegemony of Hegemony: Illusion, Thought, and Practice", Western Political Science Association 2010 Annual Meeting.
  • 9Richard J. F. Day, Gramsci is Dead: Anarchist Currents in the Newest Social Movements, London: Pluto Press, 2005, p. 8.
  • 10[美]基欧汉.《霸权之后:世界政治经济中的合作与纷争》,苏长和等译,上海人民出版社2001年版,第169-170,37,8,215页.

二级参考文献28

共引文献63

同被引文献11

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部