期刊文献+

马克思主义科学史的早期尝试——以“赫森论点”为例

The Use of Marxist Thought in "Hessen Thesis"
原文传递
导出
摘要 "赫森论点"的一个重要向度在于利用马克思主义思想资源探讨经典科学著作——《自然哲学之数学原理》的社会、经济根源问题。在社会经济需要与自然科学的关系问题上,赫森用直接的、线性的、可对应的处理方式取代了马克思、恩格斯那里长期的、曲折的、归根结底的作用模式,存在着对马、恩相关观点的庸俗化理解;在自然科学与其他意识形式的关系问题上,赫森单方面强调它们的同质性,回避自然科学的特殊性,存在着对马、恩相关观点的剪裁;但赫森没有尝试用非科学因素解释自然科学的知识内核,非科学因素的权限仅在于影响科学家科研方向和科学问题的选择,这一点上与马、恩的相关观点保持了一致。 An important dimension of Hessen thesis is using Marxist thought resource to discuss the social and economic roots of classical scientific works,such as Mathematic Principle of Nature Philosophy.On the basis of text study,this paper argues that,on the relationship of science and socioeconomic needs,Hessen used direct,linear,one-to-one mode replacing Marx and Engels' long-term,tortuous and the final mode,which is the vulgar understanding of Marx and Engels' point of view;on the relationship of science and other forms of consciousness,Hessen overemphasized the homogeneity and evaded the particularity of science,which is deliberate tailoring of Marx and Engels' point of view.But Hessen didn't try to explain the core of scientific knowledge by non-scientific factors,instead,he strictly limited the non-scientific factors into research direction and scientific issues choosing.At this point,Hessen was consistent with Marx and Engels.
作者 唐文佩
出处 《科学技术哲学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第1期73-77,共5页 Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究项目--<十字路口的科学>及其影响研究(09YJC720004) 北京大学医学部新教师科研启动基金(BMU20090507-123)
关键词 马克思主义 科学史 赫森论点 《自然哲学之数学原理》 Marxism the history of science Hessen thesis Mathematic Principle of Nature Philosophy
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Needham J. Foreword in Science at the Cross Roads[ M]. London:Frank Cass and Co, 1971:vii.
  • 2Shapin S. A Course in the Social - history of Science [ J ]. Social Studies of Science, 1980,10(2) :938.
  • 3Vucinich A. Soviet Marxism and the History of Science[J].Russian Review, 1982,41 (2) : 123 - 143.
  • 4Hall A R. The Social and Economic Roots of Newton' s "Principia. "[J]. Technology and Culture, 1972, 13 (4) : 629 - 630.
  • 5Hessen B. The Social and Economic Roots of Newton' s "Principia. " [ M ]. Science at the Cross Roads. London: Kniga, 1931.
  • 6默顿.社会理论和社会结构[M].唐少杰等译.江苏:译林出版社,2006.
  • 7贝尔纳.科学的社会功能[M].北京:商务印书馆,1982..
  • 8唐文佩.“赫森论点”文本研究[J].自然辩证法通讯,2008,30(2):57-63. 被引量:6
  • 9Vucinich A. Soviet Marxism and the History of Science [J]. Russian Review, 1982, 41 (2) :123 - 143.
  • 10Hands D W. Conjectures and Reputations: The sociology of scientific knowledge and the history of economic thought [ J]. History of Political Economy 1997,29 (4) : 695 - 739.

二级参考文献20

  • 1赵红州,蒋国华.格森事件与科学学起源[J].科学学研究,1988,6(1):16-25. 被引量:13
  • 2.马克思恩格斯选集(第2卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.268.
  • 3.马克思恩格斯选集(第4卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995..
  • 4W. F. Bynum, E. J. Browne, and Roy Porter. (eds), Dictionary of the History of Science.London & Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1981.
  • 5PM. Worsley. Marxism and culture - the missing concept Dialectiocal anthropology 1981. 6 (2): 103- 121.
  • 6A. Rupert Hall. The Social and Economic Roots of Newton's "Principia." Technology and Culture, Vol. 13, No. 4. (Oct., 1972), 629 - 630.
  • 7A. Thackray. Science at the Cross Roads. Papers Presented to the International Congress of the History of Science and Technology Held in London from June 29 to July 3,1931, by Delegates of the U.S.S.R [J]. Isis, Vol. 63, No. 4. (Dec, 1972), 566.
  • 8赵云鹏.英国自然科学家研究自然辩证法之现状.科学时报,1936,(8).
  • 9B. Hessen. The Social and Economic Roots of Newton's 'Principia'[A]. Science at the Cross Roada[C]. London: Kniga, 1931.1,2,17,19,26,20,27,62.
  • 10Robert K.Merton,范岱年等译.十七世纪英格兰的科学、技术与社会[M].北京:商务印书馆,2000.253-259.

共引文献79

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部