期刊文献+

大学生职业价值观量表的初步编制 被引量:3

Preliminary development of scale on work values for college students
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的编制适用于测量大学生职业价值观的量表。方法通过查阅文献、专家咨询及小组讨论,建立量表结构,并确定量表条目63条。在上海市3所高校的大学生中施测,有效问卷528份。采用探索性因素分析、鉴别力分析和信度分析等统计方法对数据进行统计分析。结果大学生职业价值观由六个维度构成,分别是自我价值维度(包括两个子维度:自尊维度和自我实现维度)、社会价值维度、工作环境维度、工资福利维度、工作安定性维度和社会地位维度;通过探索性因素分析保留条目43条;量表的总信度系数为0.943,各因子的信度系数在0.665~0.927之间,各条目的负荷为0.321~0.792。结论大学生职业价值观量表的条目区分度、信度和结构效度符合测量学要求: Objective To develop the scale on work values for college students. Methods 63 items were determined through reviewing items in related literatures and scales, experts consulting and panel discussion. 528 students from 3 universities in Shanghai were enrolled in the study. The data were analyzed through exploratoryfactor analysis, discrimination analysis, reliability analysis and other statistical analysis methods. Results College students' work values comprises six dimensions ~ self-value dimension ( including two sub-dimensions : self-esteem dimension and self-realization dimension) , social-value dimension, dimension of the working environment, wages and welfare dimension , job stability dimension, and the dimension of social status. 43 items were reserved after exploratory factor analyses. The coefficient of reliability of the 43 items was 0.943, and the item loading of the 43 items was 0. 321 - 0. 792. Conclusion The discernment, internal consistency and validity of the scale accord with psychometric demands.
机构地区 华东师范大学
出处 《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第12期1133-1135,共3页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基金 基金项目:上海市哲学社会科学规划课题(2008EJY003) 国家基础人才培养基金项目(J0730754)
关键词 大学生 职业价值观 量表 心理测量 College students Work values Scale Psychometric
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献41

共引文献741

同被引文献20

  • 1吴汉荣,刘普林,蒙衡.儿少生活质量量表信效度分析及全国常模的制定[J].中国学校卫生,2006,27(1):18-21. 被引量:97
  • 2耿瑞月,解亚宁,赵静波,房芳,张馨予,郝洪键.广东省武警官兵生活质量影响因素的研究[J].中国行为医学科学,2006,15(9):818-820. 被引量:11
  • 3The WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment: development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med, 1998,46 : 1569- 1585.
  • 4Brenda L,Guus L,Jan A, et al. The WHOQOL-100 has good psychometric properties in breast cancer patients. J Clin Epidemiol,2009, 62 : 195-205.
  • 5Gulbeyaz C, Zehra D, Adnan A. The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Quality of Life Index [ QLI] ( Cancer version). Eur J One Nut,2010,14: 316-321.
  • 6Ferrans E,Powers M. Quality of Life Index: development and psychometric. Adv Nut Sci, 1985,8 : 15-24.
  • 7Smith GC, Trauer T, KeRR PG, et al. Prospective quality-of-life monito- ring of simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant recipients using the 36-Item short-form health survey. Am J Kidney Dis,2010,55:698- 707.
  • 8Hornaer-Johnson W, Krahn GL, Suzuki R, et al. Differential performance of SF-36 item in heahh-y adults with and without functional limitations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil,2010,9:570-575.
  • 9Gotay C, Blaine D. Haynes. Assessment of quality of life in a multicultural cancer patient population psychological assessment. J Abnorm Psychol,2002 ,14 :439-450.
  • 10Steiger JH. Structure model evaliation and modification:An intervial estimation approach. Multivar Behav Res, 1990,25 : 173-180.

引证文献3

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部