期刊文献+

全球六大国际都市软实力比较研究 被引量:12

AN EVALUATION OF SIX INTERNATIONAL METROPOLISES' SOFT POWER
下载PDF
导出
摘要 北京和上海是国内城市的标杆,其软实力建设对其他城市具有很强的示范作用。为了准确把握全球城市体系中北京和上海的软实力现状和明确城市软实力建设方向,文章基于笔者构建的国际大都市软实力评价体系,从城市文化、国际沟通、城市创新、公共管理和生活质量吸引力5个维度,对北京、上海、纽约、伦敦、巴黎和东京6个国际大都市的软实力进行了测评,详细解析了北京和上海与其他国际大都市在软实力方面存在巨大差距的原因。 Soft power is the ability to obtain what one wants through co-option and attrection.It can be contrasted with hard power,which is the use of coercion and payment.The primary currencies of soft power are an actor's values,culture,policies and institutions.The competitiveness structures of the cities in China are so unbalanced.Their rapid economic growth wins worldwide attention,whereas the growth of soft power lags behinds severely.Beijing and Shanghai,the benchmark for Chinese cities,play an exemplary role in the growth of soft power.The authors make a comparative analysis in order to make out the present situation of Beijing and Shanghai's soft power in global context.Based on the evaluation index system of metropolis' soft power developed by Zhuang in 2009,the paper evaluates the soft power of Beijing,Shanghai,New York,London,Paris and Tokyo from the perspectives of urban culture,international communications,urban innovation,public administration and quality of living.The findings are as follows.First,New York City emerges as the number one city in terms of comprehensive soft power,followed by Paris,London,Tokyo,Beijing and Shanghai.Second,according to their overall scores,the six international metropolises are grouped into 4 levels.New York City,which scores 100,is far ahead of the other 5 metropolises;while Shanghai only scores 53 and is ranked last.Paris,London and Tokyo belong to the same level,and the scores of them are 91,88 and 85 respectively.The score of Beijing,which is 67,is higher than that of Shanghai's,however,it is far lower than other 4 metropolises.Furthermore,Paris,which is ranked the second place,wins in the urban innovation,followed by Tokyo.Third-ranked London wins in the urban culture category,while Tokyo takes the fourth place primarily due to its excellent performance in life quality.Though Beijing and Shanghai lag behind other 4 metropolises,they have good points in several indices,such as index of city safety,index of health,and so forth.Finally,the paper explores why there is huge gap between the soft power of the cities' in China and that of the other Metropolises'.
出处 《人文地理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第6期73-78,113,共7页 Human Geography
基金 上海市哲学社会科学课题(2009XAH006) 上海市政府重大决策咨询课题(2009-A-01)
关键词 软实力 文化产业 国际大都市 国际沟通 非政府组织 soft power cultural industry metropolis international communications non-government organization
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Joseph S.Nye,Jr.The Changing Nature of World Power[J].Political Science Quarterly,1990,105(2):177-192.
  • 2阎学通,徐进.中美软实力比较[J].现代国际关系,2008(1):24-29. 被引量:124
  • 3复旦大学国际公共关系研究中心(中国城市软实力调查研究课题组).2009中国城市软实力调查(精编)[J].国际公关,2009(4):86-88. 被引量:10
  • 4庄德林,杨颖.城市软实力建设热潮下的冷思考[J].云南社会科学,2010(2):96-101. 被引量:16
  • 5Joseph S.Nye,Jr.The Information Revolution and American Soft Power[J].Asia Pacific Review,2002,9(1):60-76.
  • 6李希光.话语权视角下的中国文化软实力建设[J].思想政治工作研究,2009(4):11-13. 被引量:13
  • 7Joseph S,Nye J R.Public Diplomacy and Soft Power[J].ANNALS,AAPSS,2008,(3):94-109.
  • 8Joseph S,Nye J R,Wang Jisi.Hard Decisions on Soft Power Opportunities and Difficulties for Chinese Soft Power[J].Harvard International Review,summer,2009,31(2):18-23.
  • 9Peng Er Lam.Japan's Quest for"Soft Power":Attraction and Limitation[J].East Asia,2007,24(4):349-363.
  • 10Thomas Lure,Wayne M.Morrison,Bruce Vaughu.China's"Soft Power"in Southeast Asia[R].Congressional Research Service Report for Congress,January 4,2008.1-24.

二级参考文献45

共引文献183

同被引文献123

引证文献12

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部