期刊文献+

支气管肺泡灌洗液细菌定量培养对下呼吸道感染的诊断价值 被引量:2

DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF QUANTITATIVE CULTURES OF BRONCHOALVEOLAR LAVAGE FLUIDS IN PATIENTS WITH LOWER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION
全文增补中
导出
摘要 目的:观察不同方法采样培养对下呼吸道感染病原学诊断价值。方法:采用支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF0细菌定量培养,并与保护标本刷(PSB)和痰培养进行比较。结果:感染组16例患者21例次采样,BALF法19次阳性(≥10^5cfu/ml),PSB法15例次阳性(≥10^3cfu/ml),两种方法所获菌株一致率为72.4%921/29),定量培养结果相关程序较好(r=0.807,P〈0.001)。 Objective:The aims of this study were to compare the diagnostic value of cultures of specimens collected by different sampled method of detection the bacterial etiology of lower respiratory tract infection.Method:Quantitative cultures of bronchoalveolar lavage fluids (BALF) were compared with quantitative cultures of protected specimen brush (PSB) and routine sputum cultures.Result:In infected group,16 patients with 21 times were sampled.Quantitative culture of BALF were positive (≥10 5 cfu/ml) in 19 of 21 cases,and that of PSB were positive (≥10 3 cfu/ml) in 15 of 21 cases.The results of BALF cultures in discovering microorganisms were about 72.4%(21/29) in accordance with that of PSB.BALF and PSB quantitative cultures correlated well (r=0.807,P<0.001).The sensitivity of quantiative culture was 85.0% and 95.0% for BALF and PSB respectively,and the specificity was 90.5% ,71.4% respectively.No statistical difference of sensitivity and specificity between BALF and PSB was discovered.There was a low level of agreement (33.3% and 23.6%,respectively) between sputum and BALF,PSB.Conclusion:These results suggest that the diagnostic value of quantitative cultures of BALF and PSB were agreement in patients with lower respiratory infection.The technique is simple and safe.
出处 《医师进修杂志》 1999年第11期17-19,共3页 Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
关键词 保护标本刷 下呼吸道感染 病原菌 诊断 BALF bronchoalveolar lavage fluids protected specimen brush lower respiratory infection diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献1

  • 1何礼贤,中华结核和呼吸杂志,1987年,10卷,183页

共引文献2

同被引文献9

引证文献2

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部