期刊文献+

防屈曲支撑钢框架基于延性的抗震性能设计 被引量:6

SEISMIC PERFORMANCE-BASED DESIGN BASED ON DUCTILITY OF BUCKLING-RESTRAINED BRACED STEEL FRAME
原文传递
导出
摘要 防屈曲支撑滞回曲线稳定饱满,耗能能力强,可以为结构提供较大的附加阻尼,在进行抗震设计时要予以充分考虑。传统的基于弹塑性层间位移角限值的抗震性能设计往往会高估结构总的有效阻尼比,使设计偏于不安全,因此该文以我国抗震规范弹性反应谱为基础,提出了一种基于延性的抗震性能设计方法,最后通过增加支撑构件和调整支撑的类型或截面的方法完成结构设计,使其满足抗震性能目标的要求。 The Bucking-Restrained Braces(BRBs) can undergo fully-reversed axial yield cycles without loss of stiffness and strength,whose seismic energy dissipation ability is superior.The additive damping ratio that BRBs impart to the structure is large,which must be considered in seismic performance design.The conventional seismic performance design is based on elasto-plastic inter-story displacement angle,the structure will possibly be unsafe because the total equivalent damping ratio of the structure is usually overrated.Based on the elastic demand spectrum and elasto-plastic demand spectrum which were established with elastic response spectrum in Chinese code for seismic design of buildings(GB50011-2001),a seismic performance design method based on ductility was put forward.In the design method,to meet the seismic performance objective,the braces will be installed,the section area of braces will be rectified or the common steel braces will be replaced by buckling-restrained braces.
出处 《工程力学》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第A02期201-206,共6页 Engineering Mechanics
基金 国家自然科学基金重大研究计划项目(90715021) 国家自然科学基金项目(50978080 50678057 50108005) 地震行业科研专项基金项目(200808073) 北京市自然科学基金项目(8082013) 国家十一五技术支撑项目子课题项目(2006BAJ01B02-02-03) 黑龙江省自然科学基金重点项目(ZJG0701) 中国博士后科学基金项目(20080440891) 哈尔滨工业大学科研创新基金项目(HIT.NSRIF.2009)
关键词 防屈曲支撑 钢框架 阻尼 延性 抗震性能设计 buckling-restrained brace steel frame damping ratio ductility seismic performance design
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献15

  • 1罗文斌,钱稼茹.特征延性系数谱及RC框架的目标位移[J].建筑结构,2004,34(10):24-26. 被引量:3
  • 2范立础.现代化城市桥梁抗震设计若干问题[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),1997,25(2):147-154. 被引量:42
  • 3匿名著者,1990年
  • 4钱钟毅,美国公路桥梁抗震设计准则,1988年
  • 5.GB50011-2001.建筑抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2001..
  • 6Chopra A K,Goel R K.Direct displacement-based design use of inelastic vs.elastic design spectra[J].Earthquake Spectra,2001,17(1):47~64.
  • 7Chopra A K,Goel R K.Evaluation of NSP to estimate seismic deformation:SDF systems[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,2000,126(4):482~490.
  • 8Aschheim M,Black E F.Yield point spectra for seismic design and rehabilitation[J].Earthquake Spectra,2000,16(2):317~335.
  • 9FEMA 356.Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings[S].Federal Emergency Management Agency,2000.
  • 10ATC 40.Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings[S].Applied Technology Council,1996.

共引文献66

同被引文献65

引证文献6

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部