期刊文献+

城市居住地与交通系统关系的谈判机制模型 被引量:3

Negotiation mechanism model of relationship between residential location and traffic system
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了检验交通与活动场所之间关系,建立了房主与移动家庭之间的谈判模型,得到并证明了城市每个小区每期房价的Nash均衡价格。通过模糊效用估计,获得候选小区集,在候选集上采用非协作博弈的混合策略,提出谈判机制混合策略选择居住地一定存在均衡解,通过构造函数,利用Brouwer不动点定理进行证明,并设计了求解谈判机制模型的算法。算例结果表明:道路5-8改善后,通勤目的地5、B的移动家庭选择小区8的家庭数由0变为446,通勤目的地A、B的移动家庭选择小区9的家庭数由460变化为601。可见,交通的改善影响居民居住地的选择。 In order to test the relationship between traffic and activity place,a negotiation model between homeowner and mobile home was proposed,and Nash equilibrium price of each housing price for city district was got and proven.The candidate cell set was received by fuzzy effectiveness estimation,and a mixed strategy of non-cooperative game was adopted in the candidate cell set.The existence of balanced solution was proposed to choose residential location about mixed strategy negotiation mechanism.A function was constructed,and the existence of balanced solution was proven by Brouwer fixed point theorem.An algorithm was proposed to solve the negotiation model.Numerical example result indicates that the mobile home number of choosing district 8 changes from 0 to 446 for 5 and B commute destinations,and the mobile home number of choosing district 9 changes from 460 to 601 for A and B commute destinations after the improvement of road 5-8.So traffic improvement affects residential choice,and the negotiation model is effective.4 tabs,1 fig,15 refs.
出处 《交通运输工程学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第6期102-110,共9页 Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering
基金 江西省教育厅科学技术研究项目(GJJ10668)
关键词 交通系统 NASH均衡 混合策略 居住地 交通阻抗 BROUWER不动点定理 traffic system Nash equilibrium mixed strategy residential location traffic impedance Brouwer fixed point theorem
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1CHANG J S, MACKETT R L. A bi level model of the rela- tionship between transport and residential location [ J ]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2006, 40(2): 123-146.
  • 2BRAVO M, BRICENO L, COMINETTI R, et al. An inte- grated behavioral model of the land-use and transport systems with network congestion and location externalities [ J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2010, 44(4) : 584-596.
  • 3PINJARI A R, BHAT C R, HENSHER D A. Residential self- selection effects in an activity time-use behavior model[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2009, 43(7) : 729-748.
  • 4VEGA A, REYNOLDS-FEIGHAN A. A methodological framework for the study of residential location and travel-to- work mode choice under central and suburban employment destination patterns[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2009, 43(4): 401- 419.
  • 5MOKHTARIAN P L, CAO Xin-yu. Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behavior: a focus on methodologies[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Method- ological, 2008, 42(3): 204-228.
  • 6MARTINEZ F J, HENRIQUEZ R. A random bidding and supply land use equilibrium model [J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2007, 41(6): 632-651.
  • 7EARNHART D. Combining revealed and stated data to examine housing decisions using discrete choice analysis [ J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 2002, 51(1): 143 -169.
  • 8陆化普,王建伟,袁虹.基于交通效率的大城市合理土地利用形态研究[J].中国公路学报,2005,18(3):109-113. 被引量:22
  • 9李晓燕,陈红.城市生态交通规划的理论框架[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2006,26(1):79-82. 被引量:20
  • 10裴玉龙,徐慧智.基于城市区位势能的路网密度规划方法[J].中国公路学报,2007,20(3):81-85. 被引量:7

二级参考文献43

共引文献60

同被引文献13

  • 1王媛媛,陆化普.基于可持续发展的土地利用与交通结构组合模型[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2004,44(9):1240-1243. 被引量:19
  • 2黄海军,李志纯.组合出行方式下的混合均衡分配模型及求解算法[J].系统科学与数学,2006,26(3):352-361. 被引量:28
  • 3MUTH R F. Cities and housing [ M ]. Chicago : The University of Chicago Press, 1969.
  • 4CHANG J S, MAGKETT R L. A bi-level model of the relationship between transport and residential location [ J]. Transportation R.-search Part B: Methodological,2006,40(2) : 123-146.
  • 5PINJARI A R,BHAT C R,HENSHER D A. Residential self-selection effects in an activity time-use behavior model [ J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological,2009,43(7) :729-748.
  • 6CHAUSHIE C. Structure issues and sources of bias on residential location and travel mode choice models [ D] . Evanston : Northwestern U-niversity,1981.
  • 7VEGA A,REYNOLDS-FEIGHAN A. A methodological framework for the study of residential location and travel-to-work mode choice under central and suburban employment destination patterns [ J ]. Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice,2009,43(4) :401-419.
  • 8BHAT C R,GUO J. A mixed spatially correlated logit model: formulation and application to residential choice modeling [ J ]. Transportation Research Part B : Methodological ,2004,38 (2) : 147-168.
  • 9金键,陈科,等.成都市综合交通调查报告[R].成都:西南交通大 学,2010.
  • 10BIERLAIRE M. BI0GEME! : a free package for the estimation of discrete choice models [ C ]//Proc of the 3rd Swiss Transportation Research Conference. 2003.

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部