期刊文献+

股骨远端复杂骨折的内固定方式选择 被引量:5

Internal fixation treatment mode choices for the complex distal femoral fractures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较股骨远端复杂骨折2种不同内固定方式的疗效和适应证。方法 2006年1月至2009年3月,分别采用2种内固定方法治疗成年股骨远端复杂骨折46例,男28例,女18例,年龄26~71岁,平均42.9岁。其中逆行交锁髓内钉固定组20例,加压锁定钢板内固定组26例。X线片按AO/ASIF分型,均属复杂类型骨折(A3、C2、C3型)。结果入选病例均获随访16~36个月,平均24个月。切口I期愈合,复位满意,无术后感染、内固定物断裂、骨不连、深静脉血栓、肢体短缩、膝内翻畸形等并发症。骨折愈合时间为15~20周,A组平均18.18周,B组平均18.38周,两组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。膝关节功能按Merchan评分标准评估,A组:优11例,良6例,可2例,差1例,优良率达85.0%。B组:优15例,良8例,可2例,差1例,优良率达88.5%。两组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对于股骨远端的复杂类型骨折,逆行交锁髓内钉和加压锁定钢板均能达到良好的疗效。但观测的结果显示,加压锁定钢板系统能最大限度地减少软组织损伤,对膝关节功能的恢复要优于逆行交锁髓内钉系统。 Objective To compare the efficacy and indication of the two different kinds of internal fixation treatment modes for the complex distal femoral fractures.Methods Reviewing the clinical data of 46 cases used two kinds of internal surgical treatment of complex distal femoral fracture during Jan 2006 to Mar 2009.These cases including 28 males and 18 females with an average age of 42.9-year-old ranging from age 26~71 years were divided into 2 groups:retrograde intramedullary nail group(A-Group,20 cases);pressure locking plate fixation group(B-Group,26 cases).There were all complex fracture types according X-ray film by AO/ASIF classification(A3、C2、C3).Results All patients were followed up for 16~36 months(average 24 months)and obtained first intention incisions healing and satisfied replacement without complications such as postoperative infection,implant rupture,nonunion of bone,deep vein thrombosis,limb shortening,varus deformity.Fracture healing time was 15~20 weeks,the A-Group in average 18.18 weeks and the B-Group in average 18.38 weeks,between the two groups showed no significant difference(P0.05).Postoperative knee scoring according to merchan system.A-Group:excellent in 11 cases,better in 6 cases,good in 2 cases and poor in 1 case,fine rate was 85.0%.B-Group:excellent in 15 cases,better in 8 cases,good in 2 cases and poor in 1 case,fine rate was 88.5%.Difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P0.05).Conclusion For the complex distal femur fractures,retrograde intramedullary locking nail and compression plate could achieve good results.However,the results of our observations,using locking compression plate system could to minimize soft tissue damage,the recovery of knee function seems better than using retrograde intramedullary nail system.
出处 《中国实用医药》 2010年第36期20-22,共3页 China Practical Medicine
关键词 股骨远端骨折 复杂骨折 逆行交锁髓内钉 加压锁定钢板 内固定 Distal femoral fractures Complex fracture The retrograde intramedullary nail The locking compression plate Internal fixation
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1王亦骢.骨与关节损伤.人民卫生出版社,2001:1013-1020.
  • 2Merchan EC,Maestu PR,Blanco RP.Blade-plating of closed displaced supracondylar fractures of the distal femur with the AO system.J Trauma,1992,32(2):174-178.
  • 3Papadokostakis G,Papakostidis C,Dimitriou R,et al.The role and efficacy of retrograding nailing for the treatment of diaphyseal and distal femoral fractures:a systematic review of the literature.Injury,2005,36(7):813-822.
  • 4Chen SH,Yu TC,Chang CH,et al.Biomechanical analysis of retrograde intramedullary nail fixation in distal femoral fractures.Knee,2008,15(5):384-389.
  • 5管国华,谢文龙,沈鹏,李伟,姬亚峰.逆行交锁髓钉与钢板治疗股骨髁骨折疗效比较[J].实用骨科杂志,2006,12(1):59-61. 被引量:13
  • 6Handolin L,Pajarinen J,Lindahl J,et al.Retrograde intramedullary nailing in distal femoral fractures:results in a series of 46 consecutive operations.Injury,2004,35(5):517-522.
  • 7王劲.三种固定方法治疗股骨远端骨折分析[J].中国实用医药,2010,5(3):115-116. 被引量:6
  • 8Apivatthakakul T,Chiewcharntanakit S.Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis(MIPO)in the treatment of the femoral shaft fracture where intramedullary nailing is not indicated.Int Orthop.2009,33(4):1119-1126.
  • 9Kao FC,Tu YK,Su JY,et al.Treatment of distal femoral fracture by minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis:comparison between the dynamic condylar screw and the less invasive stabilization system.J Trauma.2009,67(4):719-726.
  • 10Perren SM.Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures.The scientific basis of biological internal fixation:choosing a new balance between stability and biology.J Bone Joint Surg Br.2002,84(8):1093-1110.

二级参考文献45

共引文献135

同被引文献43

  • 1刘金辉,罗从风,曾炳芳.微创内固定系统治疗胫骨近端粉碎性骨折的疗效观察[J].中华创伤杂志,2007,23(2):87-90. 被引量:19
  • 2胥少汀,葛宝丰,徐印坎.实用骨科学[M].4版.北京:人民军医出版社,2012:608.
  • 3Shandelmaier P,Parternherner A, Koenemann B,et al.Distal femoral fractures and LISS stabilization [J]. Inju-ry,200l,32(Suppl3):55-63.
  • 4Schutz M,Kaab MJ,Haas N. Stabilization of proximal tib-ial fractures with the LIS-System : early clinical experiencein Berlin[J], Injury, 2003,34(Suppl 1) : 30-35.
  • 5Zlowodzki M,Williamson S,Zardiackas LD,et al. Biome-chanical evaluation of the less invasive stabilization systemand the 95-degree angled blade plate for the internal fixa-tion of distal femur Fractures in human cadaveric boneswith high bone mineral density [J], J Trauma, 2006,60(4):836-840.
  • 6Schutz M, Muller M, Krettek C,et al. Minimally invasivefracture stabilization of distal femoral fractures with theLISS:a prospective multicenter study. Results of a clinicalstudy with special emphasis on difficult cases[J]. Injury,2001,32(Suppl3):48-54.
  • 7Weight M, Collinge C. Early results of the less invasivestabilization system for mechanically unstable fractures ofthe distal femur (AO/OTA types A2, A3, C2, and C3)[J]_ J Orthop Trauma,2004,18(8) :503-508.
  • 8Barei DP,Beingessner DM.Open distal femur fracturestreated with lateral locked implants:union,secondary bonegrafting,and predictive parameters[J].Orthopedics,2012,35(6):843-846.
  • 9程绪刚.股骨远端骨折两种不同微创固定方法的疗效分析[J].医药前沿,2013,25(19):65-66.
  • 10Neubauer T.Distal femoral fractures[J].Unfallchirurg,2012,115(5):433-449.

引证文献5

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部