期刊文献+

保留肾单位手术治疗早期肾细胞癌疗效分析 被引量:2

Clinical outcomes of nephron sparing surgery for T1 renal cell carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 评价比较T1a和T1b期肾细胞痛患者行保留肾单位手术(NSS)的临床疗效.方法 回顾性分析1999年11月至2009年12月施行NSS治疗的101例T1期肾细胞癌患者临床资料,男性79例,女性22例,年龄28~79岁,平均52.3岁.根据肿瘤病理组织大小分为T1a期62例,T1b期39例.对两组患者一般资料、手术时间、术中出血量、术中输血率、术中肾动脉阻断率及阻断时间,以及术后并发症发生率、术后肿瘤复发转移及生存情况等进行统计学分析.结果 两组手术时间:T1a组为(151±80)min,T1b期为(158±50)min;术中出血量:T1a期(322±596)ml,T1b期(308±239)ml,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.32和P=0.45).术后随访8~102个月(平均38.4个月),除T1b期患者中1例于术后36个月因肿瘤转移死亡外,其余100例患者无肿瘤复发.结论 对T1期肾细胞癌患者施行NSS可获得满意临床效果,且T1a与T1b期患者疗效相当. Objective To investigate the safety and effect of nephron-sparing surgery (NSS)in treatment of T1a and T1b renal cell carcinoma. Methods Retrospective analyzed the clinical data of 101patients with T1 renal cell carcinoma underwent NSS from November 1999 to December 2009. Including 79male and 22 female with the mean age of 52. 3 years ( ranged 28 to 79 years). Based on tumor pathologic diameter, 101 patients were divided into T1a group with 62 patient and T1b group with 39 cases.Demographic,intraoperative, postoperative and follow-up data were compared between the 2 groups. Results The operation were performed successfully in all the 101 cases. The mean operation time was ( 151 ± 80)min in group T1a and ( 158 ±50)min in group T1b with no statistical difference (P =0.32). The mean blood loss was ( 322 ± 596) ml in group T1 a and (308 ± 239 ) ml in group T1 b ( P = 0. 45 ). Postoperative followup ranged from 8 to 102 months with a mean of 38.4 months. One patient in T1b group died of distant metastasis 36 months after operation. Others were no tumor recurred. Conclusion Nephron-sparing surgery is safe and effective for the treatment of T1a and T1b renal cell carcinoma.
出处 《中华外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第1期83-86,共4页 Chinese Journal of Surgery
关键词 肾肿瘤 肾切除术 保留肾单位手术 疗效分析 Kidney neoplasms Nephrectomy Nephron-sparing surgery Clinical analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Nguyen MM,Gill IS,Ellison LM.The evolving presentation of renal carcinoma in the United States:trends from the Surveillance,Epidemiology,and End Results program.J Urol,2006,176:2397-2400.
  • 2Ljungberg B,Hanbury DC,Kuczyk MA,et al.Renal cell carcinoma guideline.Eur Urol,2007,51:1502-1510.
  • 3张志凌,李永红,陈晓峰,刘卓炜,侯国良,韩辉,秦自科,余绍龙,张学齐,尧凯,叶云林,陈明坤,周芳坚.肾细胞癌现代外科治疗经验总结[J].中华外科杂志,2009,47(22):1758-1759. 被引量:1
  • 4Ebele JN,Sauter G,Epstein JL,et al.Pathology and genetics of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs.Lyon:IARC,2004:12-43.
  • 5Patard JJ,Shvarts O,Lam JS,et al.Safety and efficacy of partial nephrectomy for all T1 tumors based on an international multicenter experience.J Urol,2004,171:2181-2185.
  • 6Leibovich BC,Blute ML,Cheville JC,et al.Nephron sparing surgery for appropriately selected renal cell carcinoma between 4and 7 cm results in outcome similar to radical nephrectomy.J Urol,2004,171:1066-1070.
  • 7Antonelli A,Cozzoli A,Nicolai M,et al.Nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephrectomy in the treatment of intracapsular renal cell carcinoma up to 7 cm.Eur Urol,2008,53:803-809.
  • 8Breau RH,Crispen PL,Jimenez RE,et al.Outcome of stage T2or greater renal cell cancer treated with partial nephrectomy.J Urol,2010,183:903-908.
  • 9Huang WC,Levey AS,Serio AM,et al.Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours:a retrospective cohort study.Lancet Oncol,2006,7:735-740.
  • 10Thompson RH,Boorjian SA,Lohse CM,et al.Radical nephrectomy for pTl a renal masses may be associated with decreased overall survival compared with partial nephrectomy.J Urol,2008,179:468-471.

二级参考文献9

  • 1Hinman F Jr. Atlas of urologic surgery. 2^nd edition. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company,2002:984-1040.
  • 2Tsui KH, Shvarts O, Smith RB, et al. Prognostic indicators for renal cell carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of 643 patients using the revised 1997 TNM staging criteria. J Urol,2000,163 : 1090-1095.
  • 3Srivastava A, Mandhani A, Kapoor R, et al. Prognosticfactors in patients with renal cell carcinoma: is TNM (1997) staging relevant in Indian subpopulation? Indian J Cancer,2004,41:99-103.
  • 4Elmore JM, Kadesky KT, Koeneman KS, et al. Reassessment of the 1997 TNM classification system for renal cell carcinoma. Cancer, 2003,98 : 2329 -2334.
  • 5Frank I, Blute ML, Cheville JC, et al. Solid renal tumors: an analysis of pathological features related to tumor size. J Urol,2003, 170:2217-2220.
  • 6Butler BP, Novick AC, Miller DP, et al. Management of small unilateral renal cell carcinomas: radical versus nephron-sparing surgery. Urology, 1995,45 : 34 -40.
  • 7Patard J J, Shvarts O, Lam JS, et al. Safety and efficacy of partial nephrectomy for all T1 tumors based on an international multicenter experience. J Urol,2004,171:2181-2185.
  • 8Hatcher PA,Anderson EE, Paulson DF,et al. Surgical management and prognosis of renal cell carcinoma invading the vena cava. J Urol, 1991,145:20-23.
  • 9Skinner DG, Pritchett TR, Lieskovsky G, et al. Vena caval involvement by renal cell carcinoma. Surgical resection provides meaningful long-term survival. Ann Surg, 1989,210:387-392.

同被引文献20

引证文献2

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部