期刊文献+

宫颈上皮内瘤样变宫颈环形电切术的诊断与治疗价值分析 被引量:6

The Clinical Value of Loop Electrosurgical Exicision Procedure on Diagnosis and Treatment for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨宫颈环形电刀切除术(LEEP)诊断与治疗宫颈上皮内瘤样变(CIN)的临床价值。方法对90例经阴道镜下活检诊断为CIN的患者行LEEP术,采用自身对照法,对比研究阴道镜下活检和LEEP活检病理结果。结果阴道镜下宫颈活检结果与LEEP活检病理学诊断结果的完全符合率为53.33%(48/90),阴道镜下宫颈活检诊断不足27例(30.00%),诊断过度15例(16.67%),两种方法的诊断结果差异有统计学意义(W ilcoxon检验,P=0.018)。结论阴道镜直视下活检对确诊CIN尚不够可靠,阴道镜下活检不能替代LEEP活检。LEEP是诊治CIN的安全有效方法,可以弥补阴道镜下活检的局限性。 Objective To study the clinical value of loop electrosurgical excision procedure(LEEP) on diagnosis and treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia(CIN).Methods LEEP was performed on 90 patients diagnosed as CIN by colposcopically directed biopsy.The consistency of results of diagnosing CIN by colposcopically directed biopsy and LEEP was evaluated.Results The consistence rate of the diagnosis by colposcopically directed biopsy and that by LEEP was 53.33%(48/90),with the underdiagnosis rate 30.00%(27/90) and the overdiagnosis rate 16.67%(15/90).A significant difference between the diagnosis by colposcopically directed biopsy and that by LEEP was found(Wilcoxon test,P=0.018).Conclusion The accuracy of diagnosing CIN with colposcopically directed biopsy is still unsatisfying.Cervical conization by LEEP can not be instead of colpes copically directed biopsy.LEEP is a safe and effective procedure for the diagnosis and treatment of CIN.
出处 《中国全科医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第36期4143-4144,共2页 Chinese General Practice
关键词 宫颈上皮内瘤样病变 阴道镜检查 宫颈环形电刀切除术 Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Colposcopy Cervical loop electrosurgical excision procedure
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献28

共引文献476

同被引文献48

  • 1邬素芳,王薇,何福仙,马湘一,曾桂兰,郑红兵,徐茜,辜海念,杜娟,周利平,卢运萍,廖国宁,马丁.宫颈癌早期诊断4种方法的比较和意义[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2004,20(10):612-614. 被引量:42
  • 2吴晓亮,蔡飞跃,李艳芳,王培席,王家骥.女工保健研究进展[J].中国初级卫生保健,2010,24(11):27-30. 被引量:9
  • 3李素珍,夏恩兰.宫腔镜宫颈锥切治疗良性宫颈病变疗效观察[J].中国内镜杂志,2006,12(4):416-417. 被引量:16
  • 4乐杰.妇产科学[M].7版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2007:374.
  • 5顾泼.全科医学概论[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2001:1.
  • 6Giacalone PL,Laffargue F,Aligier N.Randomized study comparing two techniques of conization cold knife versus loop excision[J].Gynecol Oncol,1999,75(1):356-360.
  • 7Suh-Burgm EJ,Whall-Strojwas D,Chang Y,et al.Risk factors for cervical stenosis after loop electrocautery excision procedure[J].Obstet Gynecol,2000,96(5):657-660.
  • 8Paraskevaidis E,Koliopoulos G,Paschopoulos M,et al.Effects of ball cauterization following loop excision and follow-up colposcopy[J].Obstet Gynecol,2001,97(5):617-620.
  • 9Tyler LN,Andrews N,Parrish RS,et al.Significance of margin and extent of dysplasia in loop electrosurgery excision procedure biopsies performed for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in predicting persistent disease[J].Arch Pathol Lab Med,2007,131(4):622-624.
  • 10Cardoza-Favarato G,Fadare O.High-grade squamous intraepithelial (CIN 2 and 3)excised with negative margins by loop electrosurgical excision procedure the significance of CIN 1 at the margins of excision[J].Hum Pathol,2007,38(5):781-786.

引证文献6

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部