老子与黑格尔的比较

Comparative study between Lao Tzu and Hegel

在钱钟书求同式比较的基础上,运用比较研究法对老子和黑格尔进行分析。分析认为,黑格尔以一切主体性的客观化实现为尺度,主体与客体的分离被当作真正的起点;主体征服客体,化客体为自己是真正的终点。同时认为,老子以一切主体性的消解为成功回归的尺度,主体之执着被视作病态,以摆脱物累为起点,回到主客混融、物我不隔才是理想之所在。由此可见,钱钟书对二者所做的求同式比较是欠妥的。

Both Lao Tzu and Hegel attached great importance to dialectics.But there is great differences between them.In Hegel＇s view,the ultimate goal is the externalization of subject.The separation of subject and object is treated as a real starting point.The conquest of object and turning object into itself＇s stage is taken as a real end.From the viewpoint of Lao Tzu,a successful return is the elimination of subject and the persistence in subject is abnormal.From the beginning,he tried to get rid of the involvement into material,thus in the end,he had access to subject-object integration.So,the comparison by QIAN Zhong-shu to seek the sameness between them is defective.