期刊文献+

恶法非法论 被引量:2

The Theory of Evil-law-is-no-law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 恶法非法论是自然法学派的一项著名的理论。自古希腊至近当代,自然法学家始终坚定地认为,法有自然法与实在法之分。实在法如果违背自然法的要求,就是恶法,而恶法不是法律。恶法非法论从法哲学的高度论证了人民拥有反抗暴政的权力,是一种激进的、革命的理论。公民反抗恶法的基本方式是公民不服从,它是一种公开的、非暴力的群体性抗法行为,其目的是为了改变或废除所反对的法律。任何一个正义的社会,都应该承认公民不服从的正当性。 The theory of evil-law-is-no-law is one of the most well-known theories of natural law school.From Ancient Greece to modern and contemporary times,the natural law jurists have always been insisting that law should be divided into natural law and positive law.Positive law will be evil law if it goes against the requirement of natural law and evil law is not legal.Since 19th century,this theory has been challenged by the theory of evil-law-is-still-law from analytical jurisprudence.Analytical jurists believe that a law which is morally unjust,even evil is still legally valid as long as it is not expressly repealed.The theory of evil-law-is-no-law which demonstrates that people have the power to resist tyranny on the height of legal philosophy is a radical and revolutionary theory.The basic form for people to resist evil law is civil disobedience which is an open and non-violent group anti-law behavior on the purpose of altering or abolishing the evil law.Any just society should acknowledge the legitimacy of civil disobedience.
作者 丁以升
机构地区 华东政法大学
出处 《贵州警官职业学院学报》 2010年第6期5-11,共7页 Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College
关键词 恶法非法论 恶法亦法论 自然法学派 分析法学派 公民不服从 the theory of evil-law-is-no-law the theory of evil-law-is-still-law natural law school analytical jurisprudence civil disobedience
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献29

  • 1[意]阿奎那.阿奎那政治著作选[M].马清槐.北京:商务印书馆,1982.
  • 2强世功.法律的现代性剧场:哈特与富勒论战[M].北京:法律出版社,2005:123.
  • 3Recent Case, Criminal law in General - German Citizen Who Pursuant to Nazi Statute Informed on Husband for Expressing Anti- Nazi Sentiments Convicted under Another German Statute in Effect at Time of Act, Harvard Law Review, vol. 64 (April, 1951 ).
  • 4HO Pappe,On the Validity of Judicial Decisions in the Nazi Era, Modem Law Review,vol. 23 (May 1960).
  • 5Konrad H. Jarausch, After Hitler: Recivilizing Germans,1945 -1995, trans, by Brandon Hunziker,Oxford,New York: Oxford University Press,2006.
  • 6[美]朱迪丝·N·施克莱.守法主义:法、道德和政治审判[M].彭亚楠,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2005.
  • 7The Legacy of Nuremberg: Civilising Intluence or Institutionalized Vengeance? Edited by David AoBlumenthal and Timothy LoHo McCormack, Leiden, Boston: Koninklijke Brill nv, 2008.
  • 8[德]卡尔·迪特利希·埃尔德曼.德意志史.第4卷下册[M].华明,等译.北京:商务印书馆,1986.
  • 9Christoph Burchard, The Nuremberg Trial and its Impact on Germany, Journal of International Criminal Justice, vol. 4 ( September 2006).
  • 10Michael S. Bryant, Prosecuting the cheerful murderer: Natural law and national socialist crimes in West German courts, 1945 - 1950, Human Right Review,vol. 5 ( July -- September, 2004).

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部