期刊文献+

间接言语行为转喻中的语用参数 被引量:1

Pragmatic Parameters in Indirect Speech Act Metonymy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Panther与Thornburg提出了间接言语行为转喻理论,并说明场境概念可用于会话分析。虽然他们提到了语境因素在推理中的作用,但忽视了对一些与间接言语行为相关的必要语用参数的考虑。为了能更好地理解间接言语行为转喻,必须把认知与语用相结合,同时要充分重视说话人和听话人之间的权利、社会距离和礼貌等语用参数。 Panther and Thornburg(1998) formulate Indirect Speech Act Metonymy theory showing that the notion of scenario can be applied to the analysis of the conversation.Though they mention the influence of contextual factors,they neglect the pragmatic parameters in the process of inference.This paper aims at adding pragmatic parameters such as power,social distance and politeness to the Speech Act Metonymy theory from the cognitive pragmatic perspective.
作者 樊玲
出处 《北京化工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2010年第4期56-59,共4页 Journal of Beijing University of Chemical Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 间接言语行为转喻 语用推理 语用参数 indirect speech act metonymy pragmatic inference pragmatic parameters
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Panther, K. & Thomberg, L. A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation [J]. Journal of Pragrnatics, 1998(30): p755-769.
  • 2李勇忠.转喻的概念本质及其语用学意义[A].熊学亮,曲卫国主编.语用学采撷[C].北京:高等教育出版社,2007.
  • 3Grice, P. Studies in Ways of Words [M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1989.
  • 4Sperber, D.& Wilson, D. Relevance: Communication and Cognition [M].Oxford, 1995.
  • 5Searle, J. Indirect Speech Acts [A]. in C. Peter & Morgan, J. (eds.) Syntax and Semantics,V01.3:Speech Acts[C]. New York : Academic Press, 1975.
  • 6Perez, H. L. The Speech Act Categories [J]. Journal of English Studies, 2004.
  • 7何自然,冉永平.关联理论—认知语用学基础[J].现代外语,1998,21(3):95-109. 被引量:579

共引文献578

同被引文献19

  • 1张辉.从转喻场境到语用参数和言外ICM[J].外语学刊,2007(4):32-38. 被引量:18
  • 2何兆熊.新编语用学概要[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,2009.
  • 3何自然,冉永平.新编语用学概论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2011:299.
  • 4Levinson C S. Pragmaties [M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2012:264.
  • 5Searle, J. Indirect Speech Acts [M]//P. Cole, J. Morgan. Syntax and Semantics Vol. 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, 1975: 60.
  • 6Yule, G. Pragmatics[M]. 上海:上海外语教育出版社,2012:56.
  • 7Thomas, J. Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmaties [M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teach- ing and Research Press, 2010.
  • 8Perez Hernandez L, F. Ruiz deMendoza. Grounding, Semantic Motivation and Conceptual Interaction in Indirect Speech Acts [J]. Journal of Pragrnatics, 2002 (34): 259-284.
  • 9Austin, J. L. How to Do Things with Words[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
  • 10Searle, J. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language[M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2004.

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部