期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

WTO补偿规则之改革建议剖析 被引量：1

Comments on Reform Proposals for Improving WTO's Compensation Rules
原文传递
导出
摘要 WTO各成员及学者们针对补偿规则提出了一系列完善建议,除了一些合理性和实用性不强的建议外,总体上试图强化WTO责任制度。但这些建议中只有个别建议可能被接受,其他建议虽具有法律逻辑上的合理性,但至少暂时恐难为WTO成员特别是贸易大国所接受。这些强化WTO责任制度的建议能否被接受,取决于多种因素的影响,特别是贸易大国愿意在多大程度上推进贸易的自由化。 WTO members and scholars put forth a series of suggestions about improving the WTO＇s compensation rules which as a whole intend to strengthen WTO＇s liability rules. But among these suggestions, although some suggestions are rational from the angle of legal logic, only a few of them can be accepted by WTO members, especially by trade powers. The acceptance of these suggestions strengthening WTO＇s liability rules mainly depends on the effects of many factors, especially the desire of trade powers for trade liberalization.
作者 张军旗 盛建
机构地区 上海财经大学法学院 山东省青岛市中级人民法院
出处 《上海财经大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第6期41-47,共7页 Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
基金 国家社会科学基金项目<WTO体制下的国际法律责任制度研究>(05CFX033)
关键词 WTO 争端解决 补偿 国际责任 WTO dispute settlement compensation international responsibility
分类号 F741.2 [经济管理—国际贸易]
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Ernst-Ulrich Petersman, The GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System, Kluwer Law International Ltd, 1997,p. 80.
  • 2[美]戴维·帕尔米特,[希腊]佩特罗斯·C·马弗鲁第斯.《WTO中的争端解决:实践与程序》,罗培新等译,北京大学出版社2005年版,第150页.
  • 3GATT Doe, Report of the Ad Hoe Group on I.egal Amendments to the General Agreement, COM. TD/F/ 4, 4 March 1966.
  • 4WTO Doc, WT/GC/W/162, 1 April 1999.
  • 5Marco Bronckers and Naboth van den Broek, Financial Compensation in the WTO.. Improving the Rem- edies of WTO Dispute Settlement, 8 Journal of International Economic Law 101, March 2005, pp. 103,113, 124.
  • 6Joost Pauwelyn, Enforcement and Countermeasure in the WTO= Rules are Rules-toward a more collective approach, 94 American Journal of International Law 335, April 2000, pp. 345--346.
  • 7韩永红.偏离权配额交易——改革WTO体制下补偿制度的一种新思路[J].环球法律评论,2009,31(5):142-149. 被引量：1
  • 8WTO Doc, TN/DS/W/91, 16 July 2007.
  • 9WTO Doc, TN/DS/W/17, 9 October 2002;WTO Doc, TN/DS/W/40, 27 January 2003.
  • 10WTO Doc, TN/DS/W/15, 25 September 2002.

二级参考文献78

  • 1张军旗.论WTO国际责任的范围及其发展方向[J].政治与法律,2006(6):87-93. 被引量：6
  • 2Norway- Procurement of Toll Collection Equipment for the City of Trondheim, panel report, GPR/DS.2/R, adopted 13 May 1992.
  • 3Ibid,para.4.17.
  • 4U.S. - Import Measures on Certain Products from the EC, panel report, WT/DS165/R, 19 April 2000, para.6.
  • 5Japan - Taxes on Alcohol Beverages, WT/DS8/AB/R,WT/DS10/AB/R WT/DS11/AB/R,4 October 1996.
  • 6David Palmeter & Petros C. Mavroidis, "Dispute Setdement in the World Trade Organization: Practice and Procedure", Kluwer Law International,1999, p.167.
  • 7Ian Browlie, "System of the Law of Nations - State Responsibility", Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983, pp.210 - 222.
  • 8Alan O. Sykes, "The Remedy for Breach of Obligations under the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: Damages or Specific Performance?" in M.Bronckers and R. Quick (eds.), "New Directions in International Economic Law", Kluwer Law International, 2000, pp.347- 357.
  • 9PCIJ,Ser A,no.17(1928),p.47.
  • 10E. Vermulst and N. Kornuro, "Antidumping Dispute in the WTO: Navigating Dire Straits", Journal of World Trade, 1997, Vol. 31, pp.25- 31.

共引文献11

同被引文献10

  • 1Joel P. Trachtman , Trade in financial services under GATS, NAFTA and the EC : A Regulatory Jurisdiction Analysis, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, Voi. 34, pp. 37-55.
  • 2Deborah A. Osiro, GATT/WTO Necessity Analysis: Evolutionary Interpretation and its Impact on the Autonomy of Domestic Regulation, Legal Issues of Economic Intergration (LIEI), 2002, p. 123.
  • 3US-Gasoline, Appellate Body Report, p. 16.
  • 4US-Section 337, GATT Panel Report, para. 5.26.
  • 5Korea-Beef, Appellate Body Report, paras. 162-167.
  • 6US-Gambling, Appellate Body Report, para. 291.
  • 7Gisele Kapterian, A Critique of the WTO Jurisprudence on 'Necessity', International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 2010, p. 103.
  • 8Robert'Howse & Elisabeth TUrk, The WTO Impact Upon Internal Regulations: A Case Study of the Canada- EC Asbestos Dispute, in George Bermann and Pertos Mavroidis, Trade and Human Health and Safety , Cambridge University Press, New York 2007, p. 113.
  • 9Benn Mcgrady, Necessity Exceptions In WTO Law:Retreaded Tyres, Regulatory Prepose and Cumulative Regulatory Measures, Journal of International Economic Law, 2008, p. 158.
  • 10Damme, Isabelle Van , Treaty interpretation by the WTO Appellate Body , Oxford University Press, 2009, p. 643.

引证文献1

二级引证文献7

上海财经大学学报（哲学社会科学版）
2010年 第6期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部