期刊文献+

人下颌骨在不同应变率下的拉伸强度 被引量:1

Tension strength of human mandible under different strain rate
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究下颌骨在不同应变率下的生物力学性质,分析应变率和骨密度对极限强度、弹性真量和破坏应变的影响。方法:以5具新鲜男性青年尸体的下颌骨为材料,对每具标本进行骨密度测定,然后制成标准试件在INSTRON材料试验机上进行电子拉伸,应变率分别为0.0003、0.003、0.03、0.3s-1,获得不同应变率下的应力-应变曲线、下颌骨的极限强度、弹性模量以及破坏应变。应用Oropn5.0软件在PC机上进行数据统计和分析。结果:下颌骨在0.0003、0.003、0.03、0.3s-1的拉伸应变率下的极限强度分别为61.24、66.88、74.55、81.11N/mm2,弹性模量分别为15.17×103、16.72×103、1852×103、21.67×103N/mm2,破坏应变分别为0.731%、0.666%、0.625%、0.593%。结论:下颌骨为粘弹性材料,其生物力学性质和应变率有密切的关系.随着应变车数量级的增加,极限强度是逐后递增的,而骨密度和极限强度呈正相关关系。 To study the biomechanicalcharacteristics of human mandible under differenttension strain rate and analyze the relationshipbetween the strain rate and the strength, modu-lus and ultimate strain. Methods: Bone density forof 5 fresh human mandiblae was measured andthen tension test was performed at differentstrain rates (e= 0. 0003、0. 003、0. 03、0. 3 s-1)byusing INSTRON to acqure the ultimate strength,breaking strain and modulus,The soft ware of O-rigin 5. 0 was used to analyze all data. Results:The ultimate strength were 61. 24、66. 88、74. 55、81. 11N/mm2, breaking strain were 0.731%, 0. 666 %, 0. 625 %, 0. 593% and moduluswere 15. 17×103, 16. 72×103, 18. 52×103, 21. 67×103N/mm2 respectively under above four dif-ferent strain rates. Couclusion: Human mandibleis sensitive to strain rate (loading speed) andthere may be a positive correlation between theultitnate strength and bone density.
作者 薄斌 周树夏
出处 《实用口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 1999年第6期417-418,共2页 Journal of Practical Stomatology
关键词 下颌骨 张力 应变率 极限强度 Mandible Tension Strain rate Ultimate strength
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1薄斌 周树夏 等.下颌骨在撞击载荷作用下的应力分布[J].第四军医大学学报,1999,20:119-119.
  • 2孙家驹 耿介.人的密质骺力学性能[J].力学进展,1987,17:200-200.
  • 3薄斌,第四军医大学学报,1999年,20卷,119页
  • 4孙家驹,力学进展,1987年,17卷,200页

共引文献2

同被引文献8

  • 1Anderson JD.Ten-year survial rate for cantilevered fixed partial denture[J].Evid Based Dent,2005,6(4):96-97.
  • 2Sorrentino R,Aversa R,Ferro V,et al.Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strain and stress distributions in endodontically treated maxillary central incisors restored with different post,core and crown materials[J].Dent Mater,2007,23(8):983-993.
  • 3Huang HM,Tsai CY,Lee HF,et al.Damping effects on the response of maxillary incisor subjected to a traumatic impact force:a nonlinear finite element analysis[J].J Dent, 2006,34(6):261-268.
  • 4Paphangkorakit J,0sborn JW.The effect of pressure on a maximum incisal bite force in man[J].Arch Oral Biol, 1997,42(1):11-17.
  • 5Aboushelib MN.Jager N,Kleverlaan CJ,et al.Effect of loading method on the fracture mechanics of two layered all-ceramic restorative systems[J].Dent Mater,2007,23 (8):952-959.
  • 6Hanck JE,Sakaguchi RL,Sun T,et al.Elongation and preload stress in dental implant abutment screws[J].Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,1995,10(5):529-536.
  • 7张新春,陈慧芝,滕伟,王焱,樊瑜波,蒋文涛.动态载荷下三种形式箍效应的有限元分析[J].南方医科大学学报,2008,28(9):1646-1648. 被引量:11
  • 8王革,程祥荣.三维有限元动态分析不同螺距的两种螺纹种植体的应力分布[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2000,16(3):214-216. 被引量:6

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部