摘要
目前国内各种哲学辞书、教科书和研究论著中一致断定康德哲学的实质是先验唯心主义。对康德哲学的这种定义提出了质疑,认为这种定义(康德的自我定性在内)是传统形而上学意义上的表层定义,没有体现现代哲学更深层次的研究成果。康德的确意识到柏拉图式实在论的方向性错误,也为完善形而上学体系付出了毕生的精力。可是,被当时风光无限的自然科学的光环所困扰,以先验实在替换柏拉图的心外客观实在,以先验的形式重蹈了柏拉图的实在论覆辙。
Nowadays different kinds of philosophical dictionaries,textbooks and research paper unanimously exhorted the essence of Kant's philosophy is idealist apriosism.The paper questions such an idea and thinks it(Kant's own idea included) is only a surface understanding of the traditional metaphysics.Much profound research fruit should be exposed.It is true that Kant really realized the fundamental mistake in Plato's realism and he made a life-long contribution to perfect metaphysics.However,he was misled by then glorious development in natural sciences and took the place of Plato's outside objectivity with his prior objectivity. He himself followed the same old disastrous road of Plato.
出处
《皖西学院学报》
2010年第6期1-5,共5页
Journal of West Anhui University
关键词
康德
实在论
休谟
普遍必然性
Kant
realism
Hume
universal inevitability