期刊文献+

对两则避世政治童谣的比较

Comparison between two Masquerade Political Nursery Rhymes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以政治童谣为附会的看法延续两千余年,20世纪也未有突破,但这种诗歌文化现象反复出现,必有自己的规律。通过剖析、对比两则避世童谣,发现它们背后有一个共同的基础:童谣的灵验与否,实际和作谣者的政治判断能力有关,敏锐的政治分析使童谣应验,反之则害人误国,从而表明童谣是一种表达思想甚至谋略论断的特殊政治诗歌。 The opinion that political nursery rhymes were always given strained interpretation has lasted for more than two thousand years,which has not been broken through even in the 20th century,However,this cultural phenomenon occuring repeatedly must have its own laws,By analyzing and comparing two Masquerade nursery rhymes,the author finds that they have a common basis behind,Whether nursery rhymes can come true in the reality or not is related with rhymes-writers' political judgment,The writers' keen political analysis can make their rhymes fulfilled in the reality,otherwise mislead the mass and harm the nation,Therefore,nursery rhymes are a kind of special political poetry which are exploited to express writers' ideas,strategy and argument,
作者 舒大清
出处 《山西大同大学学报(社会科学版)》 2010年第6期42-46,共5页 Journal of Shanxi Datong University(Social Science Edition)
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(07BZW016)
关键词 童谣 理性 附会 nursery rhymes ration strained interpretation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1朱自清.朱自清全集[M].南京:江苏教育出版社,1990.
  • 2谢贵安.中国谶谣文化研究[M].海口:海南出版社,1993.
  • 3东汉·范晔.后汉书[M].北京:中华书局,1965.
  • 4晋·陈寿撰,南朝·宋·裴松之注.三国志[M].北京:中华书局,1982.7月.
  • 5唐·房玄龄等.晋书[M].北京:中华书局.1974.
  • 6西汉·司马迁.史记[M].北京:中华书局,1982.

共引文献154

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部