期刊文献+

2次爆炸事件的相关性与能量比研究 被引量:2

Relativity and energy ratio between two explosion events
下载PDF
导出
摘要 主要对全球地震台网(GSN)牡丹江(MDJ)地震台记录的2006年10月9日与2009年5月25日爆炸事件进行分析对比研究。应用2次事件的P震相最大振幅比值和功率谱比值估计了2次事件的能量比。应用互相关值和相干函数方法计算了2次事件在时域与频域的相关性。最后得出,2009年的爆炸事件与2006年爆炸事件相比,3个方向的P震相最大单振幅比值平均为3.97,功率谱比值平均为4.5,由此估计2009年爆炸事件是2006年爆炸事件能量的4~5倍。MDJ台3个方向(Z、N、E)记录的2次事件在1~4Hz频段的互相关值平均为0.88,相干函数平均为0.8左右。 Two explosion events recorded by station MDJ on October 9,2006 and May 25,2009 were investigated,respectively.The energy ratio of the two explosion events was estimated by comparing the maximum P phase amplitudes and the power spectrum densities.Relativity of the two explosion events in time and frequency domains was determined by using the cross correlation and the coherence function.Comparison between the 2009 event and the 2006 event displays that the mean ratio of the maximum P phase amplitudes in three components is about 3.97,the mean ratio of the power spectrum densities is about 4.5.It indicates that the energy released by the 2009 explosion event is 4~5 times as much as that released by the 2006 explosion event.The mean cross correlation of the two events recorded in the three components of MDJ was about 0.88 in 1~4Hz,and the coherence values of the two events are around 0.8at the same frequency band.
作者 郝春月 郑重
出处 《爆炸与冲击》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第5期535-540,共6页 Explosion and Shock Waves
基金 中国地震局地球物理研究所中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务专项基金项目(DQJB08B19)
关键词 爆炸力学 相关性 相干函数 爆炸事件 能量比 功率谱比 mechanics of explosion relativity coherence function explosion event energy ratio ratio of power spectrum density
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1USGS National Earthquake Information Center, US. Geological survey earthquake database[DB/OL]. America: USGS, 1940[2010-10-8]. http//: neic. usgs. gov/cgi-bin/epic/epic. cgi? SEARCHMETHOD= 1&FILEFORMAT = 4&SEARCHRANGE = HH&SYEAR = 2006 &SMONTH = 10 &SDAY = 9 &EYEAR = 2006 &EMONTH = 10 &EDAY= 9 &LMAG= 3 &UMAG = 6 & NDEP1 = 0 &NDEP2 = 2 &IO1 =&IO2 = &SLAT2 = 0.0 &SLAT1 = 0. 0 & SLON2 = 0.0& SLON1 = 0.0& CLAT = 0.0 & CLON = 0.0& CRAD = 0 & SUBMIT& =Submit+ Search.
  • 2USGS National Earthquake Information Center, US. Geological survey earthquake database[DB/OL]. America: USGS, 1940[2010-10-8]. http//: neic. usgs. gov/cgi-bin/epic/epic. cgi? SEARCHMETHOD= 1 &FILEFORMAT = 4&SEARCHRANGE = HH&SYEAR = 2009&SMONTH = 5&SDAY= 25&EYEAR = 2009&EMONTH = 5 & EDAY= 25 & LMAG= 4 & UMAG = 5 &NDEP1 = 0 &NDEP2 = 2& IO1 = &IO2 = & SLAT2 = 0.0 & SLAT1 = 0. 0 & SLON2 = 0.0 & SLON1 = 0.0 &CLAT=0.0 & CLON = 0.0 &CRAD= 0& SUBMIT = Submit + Search.
  • 3Tormod K. On exploitation of small aperture noress type arrays for enhanced P-wave detectability[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1989,79 (3) : 888-900.
  • 4Mykkeltveit S, AstebOl K, Doornbos D J, et al. Seismic array configuration optimization[J]. Bulletin of the Seis- mological Society of America, 1983,73(1):173-186.
  • 5Harjes H P. Design and siting of a new regional seismic array in Central Europe[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society Of America, 1990,80(6B) : 1801-1817.
  • 6Kulhanek O. Signal and noise coherence determination for the uppsala seismograph array station[J]. Pageoph, 1973,109(1) : 1653-1671.

同被引文献18

  • 1吴忠良.核试验监测的技术和物理[J].物理,2007,36(7):559-564. 被引量:3
  • 2彼得·鲍曼.2006.新地震观测实践手册[M].北京:地震出版社,236-237.
  • 3时振梁 张少泉.地震工作手册[M].北京:地震出版社,1992..
  • 4USGS. Earthquakes: Search EQ archives[EB/OL]. [2006-10-09]. http., ff earthquake, usgs. gov/earthquakes/eqar chives/epic/.
  • 5USGS. Earthquakes: Search EQ archives[EB/OL]. [2009- 5 -25]. http:///earthquake, usgs. gov/earthquakes/eqar chives/epic/.
  • 6USGS. Earthquakes: Search EQ archives[EB/OL]. [2013-02-12]. http: /// earthquake, usgs. gov/earthquakes/eqar chives/epic/.
  • 7Kim W Y, Richards P G. North Korean nuclear test= Seismic discrimination at low yield[J]. Eos, Transactions A merican Geophysical Union, 2007,88(13/14) : 157-161.
  • 8Kverna T. On exploitation of small-aperture NORESS type arrays for enhanced P-wave detectability[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1989,79(3) :888-900.
  • 9Mykkeltveit S, Astebol K, Doornbos D J, et al. Seismic array configuration optimization[J]. Bulletin of the Seis- mological Society of America, 1983,73(1) : 173-186.
  • 10Harjes H P. Design and siting of a new regional seismic array in Central Europe[J] Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1990,80(6B) :1801-1817.

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部