2Schutte HK,Nieboer GJ.Aerodynamics of esophageal voice production with and without a Groningen voice prosthesis.Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica,2002,54:8.
2Ackerstaff AH, Hilgers FJ, Aaronson NK, et al. Communication,functional disorders and lifestyle changes after total laryngectomy. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci, 1994, 19:295-300.
3Miani C, Bellomo A, Bertino G, et al. Dynamic behavior of the Provox and Staffieri prostheses for voice rehabilitation following total laryngectomy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 1998, 255 : 143-148.
4Schutte HK, Nieboer GJ. Aerodynamics of esophageal voice production with and without a Groningen voice prosthesis. Folia Phoniatr Logop, 2002, 54 : 8-18.
5Zijlstra R J, Mahieu HF, van Lith-Bijl JT, et al. Aerodynamic properties of the low-resistance Groningen button. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 1991, 117:657-661.
6Annyas AA, Nijdam HF, Escajadillo JR, et al. Groningen prosthesis for voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci, 1984, 9:51-54.
7Weinberg B, Moon JB. Impact of tracheoesophageal puncture prosthesis airway resistance on in-vivo phonatory performance. J Speech Hear Disord,1986, 51:88-91.
8Blom ED, Singer MI, Hamaker RC. A prospective study of tracheoesophageal speech. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 1986, 112:440-447.
9Dworkin JP, Meleca RJ, Zormeier MM, et al. Videostroboscopy of the pharyngoesophageal segment in total laryngectomees. Laryngoscope, 1998, 108:1773-1781.
10Kelly DH. Where are we in the use of trachecesophageal puncture voice restoration:some possible complications on the horizon. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2001, 9:127-128.
