期刊文献+

腹主动脉旁淋巴结阳性的胰头及胆管癌患者术后疗效评估

Efficacy evalualion of aortic lymph node-positive patients with pancreatic and bile duct cancer after operation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 研究腹主动脉淋巴结阳性的壶腹周围癌患者的临床特征及术后疗效. 方法 对101例壶腹周围癌患者进行胰切除术,所有切除的标本包括相应的淋巴结均送病理科进行详细的检查.如在淋巴结中发现转移灶即认为是阳性,阳性淋巴结的数量及部位均做详细记录.同时将腹主动脉旁有阳性淋巴结记录的患者15例定为A组,腹主动脉旁无阳性淋巴结记录的患者86例定为B组,对15名经病理证实有腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移的胰头及胆管癌患者进行胰切除术,观察术后两组患者的生存率和术后生存曲线. 结果 术后患者1、2、3年生存率分别为33%、27%和0,平均生存12个月(3~33个月).无腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移的胰头癌及胆管癌患者的生存曲线明显好于那些有淋巴结转移的患者(P<0.01). 结论 腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移的患者术后生存率较低,因而不应再进行扩大切除术. Objective To explore the clinicopathologic features and surgical Results of paraaortic node-positive periampullary adenocarcinoma. Methods 101 patients underwent pancreatectomy with regional and paraaortic lymphadenectomy.Fifteen(15%)patients had histologically proven paraaortic lymph node disease. Results The 15 patients included 9(26%)of 34 patients with pancreatic head carcinoma and 6(17%)of 36 patients with bile duct adenocarcinoma.All 15 patients had locally advanced tumor invading adjacent structures.The 1-,2-,and 3-year survival rates were 33%,27%,and 0%,with median survival of 12 months(range from 3 to 33months).In patients with pancreatic head carcinoma or bile duct adenocarcinoma,survival curve for those without paranortic lymph node metastasis was significantly better than those with involved paraaortic lymph nodes(P〈0.01). Conclusion When the paraaortic lymph nodes obtained from sampling biopsy were histologically positive,radical pancreatectomy with extended lymphatic and soft tissue clearance should be abandoned owing to poor outcome.
作者 任波
出处 《中国基层医药》 CAS 2010年第23期3239-3240,I0002,共3页 Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
关键词 胰腺肿瘤 淋巴结 Pancreatic Neoplasms Lymph Node
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献43

  • 1蔡景修,郑树国.胰腺癌围手术期主要并发症的防治对策[J].临床外科杂志,2004,12(4):195-197. 被引量:13
  • 2彭淑牖,刘颖斌.胰十二指肠切除术胰肠吻合口漏的防治措施[J].临床外科杂志,2004,12(4):199-200. 被引量:36
  • 3唐瑞峰,张风瑞,彭利,王顺祥,肖燕,王曙霞.胰头癌的临床病理特点与根治术后预后的关系[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2004,10(4):235-237. 被引量:2
  • 4刘颖斌,马孝明,李江涛,王许安,蔡炜龙,孔颖,王俊,王建伟,曹利平,彭淑牖.侵犯重要血管的胰头癌切除的可行性探讨[J].外科理论与实践,2007,12(3):221-224. 被引量:6
  • 5Iqbal N, Lovegrove RE, Tilney HS, et al. A comparison of pancreatieoduodenectomy with extended pancreaticoduodeneetomy: a meta-analysis of 1909 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2009, 35:79- 86.
  • 6Kern S, Hruban R, Hollingsworth MA, et al. A white paper: the product of a pancreas cancer think tank. Cancer Res, 2001, 61 : 4923-4932.
  • 7Richter A, Niedergethmann M, Sturm JW, et al. Long-term results of partial pancreaticoduodenoctomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head: 25-year experience. World J Surg, 2003, 27: 324-329.
  • 8Benassai G, Mastrorilli M, Quarto G, et al. Factors influencing survival after resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas. J Surg Oneol, 2000, 73:212-218.
  • 9Billingsley KG, Hur K, Henderson WG, et al. Outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary cancer: an analysis from the Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Gastrointest Surg, 2003, 7:484-491.
  • 10Tomaic A,Pleskovic B ,Trotovsek B,et al. Factors influencing survival after duodeno- pancreatectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma. Pancreatology, 2002, 2:217-361.

共引文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部