期刊文献+

1888~1911年英俄在西藏的角逐 被引量:3

Rivalry between Britain and Russia on Tibet from 1888 to 1911
下载PDF
导出
摘要 1888~1911年英俄围绕西藏展开了角逐。从过程来看,英国在与俄国的角逐中处于强势地位,然而从实际效果来看,似乎俄国更占优势。英国政府致力于确立西藏的"中立化"自治地位,然而,由于清政府的坚决反对,英国在英俄协定中所确认的"宗主权"就不具备合法性,随之而来的某些条款更不具备实际操作性。相反,俄国人利用英俄协定,限制了英国对藏政策,并为其随时过问英国对藏政策提供了条约保障。 From 1888 to 1911,Britain and Russia started to contend in Tibet.From the process of competition between Britain and Russia,Britain was in a strong position.But from the actual results,it seemed that Russia was in a better position.The British government committed to establish Tibet’s "neutral" and autonomous status.However,because of the opposition of the Qing government,finally,the agreement about Tibet’s "suzerainty" status signed by Britain and Russia did not have legitimacy.Subsequently,the agreement was not under actual operating conditions.On the contrary,Russia used the agreement to restrict and interfere the British policy on Tibet.
作者 冯建勇
出处 《西藏研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第6期1-11,共11页 Tibetan Studies
关键词 英国 俄国 西藏 角逐 Britain Russia Tibet rivalry
  • 相关文献

参考文献36

  • 1周伟洲.英俄侵略我国西藏史略[M].西安:陕西人民出版社,1983:45-46.
  • 2孙子和.西藏研究论集[M].台北:台湾商务印书馆,1988:23.
  • 3FOR. sec. e, nos. 56 - 57, August 1899, Notes, pp. 1 - 2 Le Mesurier to Barnes ( demi - offi- cial)2d April 1899.
  • 4Curzon Papers, Roll No. 1 (Mss, Eur. f. 111/ 158) Letter no, 21, Curzon to Hamilton, 12 May 1899.
  • 5Curzon Papers, Roll No. 158)Letter no. 23. Curzon 1899. 1 (Mss. Eur. f. 111/ to Hamilton ,24, May.
  • 6寇松致汉密尔顿,[A].汉密尔顿信函[C].1900年11月18日.
  • 7Papers Relating to Tibet, OP. cit., Enclosure 2,no. 27. pp. 100-101.
  • 8FOR. Sec, nos. 78 - 108, September 1900, no. 85 Hamilton to Curzon,8 December 1899.
  • 9FOR. Sec. e,nos. 56 -58,June 1902,no. 56.Precis of Information regarding Russian Mis-sion to Lhasa and Tibetan Mission to Rus- sia.
  • 10FOR. Sec. e,nos. 1 - 77,March 1902, Enclo. 1, No. 18.

同被引文献200

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部