期刊文献+

碳关税对我国经济影响评价 被引量:31

Evaluation on the Carbon Tariff Effect on China's Economy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文利用可计算一般均衡模型,对其他国家可能针对我国实行的碳关税政策进行了模拟。研究发现,该政策将对我国能源、钢铁冶炼以及水泥石灰石膏、耐火材料等非金属矿物制造业部门的出口产生很大的负面影响;而金融保险、信息传输服务业、印刷媒介复制业、玩具娱乐用品制造业、水的生产供应业和塑料制品业以及油气开采和管道运输业等部门出口反而增加。同时碳关税的征收降低了我国企业的生产积极性,使得我国GDP、社会总产出、国内供给以及进出口总量都不同程度地下降;进而导致社会投资、劳动就业以及企业与居民收入下降;而居民消费因价格普遍下跌而略有上升。从环境效率角度而言,碳关税的减排效率很低。 With the CGE model,this paper simulated the potential influences of carbon tariff policy that may be carried by other countries towards China's exports.Simulating results indicate that it will negatively affect the exports of energy,iron and steel smelting,cement,lime and plaster,fireproof materials and other nonmetallic mineral products,but will promote other sectors exports,like finance,insurance,telecommunication,printing,reproduction of recording media,toys,entertainment,athletic and recreation products,water production and supply,plastic products,extraction of petroleum and natural gas,and pipelines transport.In the macro-level,carbon tariff will depress the enthusiasm for production,hence decrease the GDP,final output,domestic supply and the amount of export and import.Furthermore,the income of enterprises and residents will also drop with the shrink of social investment and labor demand.Even so,residents' consumption shows up a slight increase due to an universal price fall caused by carbon tariff.The abatement efficiency of carbon tariff is rather low from the environmental aspect.
作者 朱永彬 王铮
出处 《中国软科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第12期36-42,49,共8页 China Soft Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(40771076) 国家863计划项目(2008AA12Z204) 中国科学院创新工程项目群(KZCX2-YW-Q1-09)
关键词 碳关税 经济影响 CGE 减排 出口 carbon tariff economic influence CGE abatement export
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1ChinaStakes,China Criticizes US Carbon Tariff "Protectionism",Considers Domestic Carbon Tax Policy[EB].http://www.chinastakes.com/2009/9/china-criticizes-us-carbon-tariff-protectionism-considers-domestic-carbon-tax-policy.html,2009/09/24,accessed at 2010/03/18.
  • 2PALMER D.US climate bill needs strong border measure-Baucus[N].Reuters,2009/11/10,http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN10310396,accessed at 2010/03/18.
  • 3EurActiv.France to renew calls for EU carbon tariff[EB].http://www.euractiv.com/en/climate-environment/france-renew-calls-eu-carbon-tariff-news-290621,2010/03/01,accessed at 2010/03/18.
  • 4ZHANG Zhong Xiang.The US Proposed Carbon Tariffs and China's Responses[J].Energy Policy,2010,38(5):2168 -2170.
  • 5World Trade Organization (WTO) and United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).Trade and Climate Change:WTO-UNEP Report[R].Geneva,2009.
  • 6Naghavi A.Can R&D-inducing Green Tariffs Replace International Environmental Regulations[J].Resource and Energy Economics,2007,29 (4):284-299.
  • 7Lessmann K,Marschinski R,Edenhofer O.The Effects of Tariffs on Coalition Formation in a Dynamic Global Wanning game[J].Economic Modelling,2009,26 (3):641-649.
  • 8Kuik O,Hofkes M.Border Adjustment for European Emissions Trading:Competitiveness and Carbon Leakage[J].Energy Policy,2010,38(4):1741 -1748.
  • 9LIN Bo Qiang,SUN Chuan Wang.Evaluating Carbon Dioxide Emissions in International Trade of China[J].Energy Policy,2010,38(1):613 -621.
  • 10吴静,王铮,吴兵.石油价格上涨对中国经济的冲击——可计算一般均衡模型分析[J].中国农业大学学报(社会科学版),2005,22(2):69-75. 被引量:15

共引文献15

同被引文献408

引证文献31

二级引证文献152

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部