期刊文献+

坦索罗辛在晚期前列腺癌中应用的疗效及安全性分析 被引量:6

Treatment Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Tamsulosin Application for Advanced Prostate cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:评价并探讨坦索罗辛(Tamsulosin,Harnal)治疗前列腺癌伴发下尿路症状(LUTS)的临床疗效及治疗的安全性。方法:2009年1月~2010年10月,收治存在LUTS、血压正常且国际前列腺症状评分(IP-SS)均在20分以上的晚期前列腺癌患者76例,随机分为治疗组和对照组,均进行最大限度雄激素阻断治疗(MAB),同时治疗组联合应用超选择性α1A受体阻滞剂进行治疗。结果:治疗后4周和8周,治疗组的IPSS、生活质量指数评分、最大尿流率、前列腺体积、剩余尿量均较对照组有显著性改善(P<0.05),血压变化的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗4周与8周比较无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论:MAB治疗可延长晚期前列腺癌患者的无进展生存期,而坦索罗辛可有效改善晚期前列腺癌患者下尿路症状,提高生活质量,且不良反应甚微。 Objective:To evaluate and investigate the treatment efficacy and safety of tamsulosin application for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer associated with lower urinary tract symptoms(LUTS). Methods:January 2009-October 2010,76 patients with advanced prostate cancer in our department who have LUTS, normal blood pressure and whose international prostate symptom score (IPSS) were more than 20 points, are randomly divided into treatment group (T) and control group (C). Both groups were treated with Maximal androgen blockade (MAB), and T group also combined with super-selective αlA receptor antagonist for treatment. Results: after 4 weeks and 8 weeks treatment,international prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life index scoresmaximum urinary flow rate, prostate volume (V), residual urine volume (Ru) were much improvement in T group compared with the C group(P〈0.05), Blood pressure variation was no significant difference(P〉0.05). Treatment for 4 weeks and 8 weeks showed no significant difference(P〉0.05). Conclusions..MAB treatment may prolong progression-free survival of patients of advanced prostate cancer, tamsulosin may be effective in improving symptoms and quality of life in these patients who had LUTS with very little adverse reactions.
出处 《临床泌尿外科杂志》 北大核心 2011年第2期158-160,共3页 Journal of Clinical Urology
关键词 晚期前列腺癌 下尿路症状 坦索罗辛 Advanced prostate cancer, lower urinary tract symptoms, Tamsulosin
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Prostate Cancer Trialists'Collaborative Group.Maximum androgen blockade in advanced prostate cancer:overview of the randomized trail[J].Lancet,2000,355:1491-1498.
  • 2Grawford E D.Epidemiology of prostate cancer[J].Urology,2003,62(6 Suppl 1):3-12.
  • 3Rahardjo D,Soebadi D M,Sugandi S,et al.Efficacy and safety of tamsulosin hydrochloride compared to doxazosin in the treatment of Indonesian patients with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia[J].Int J Urol,2006,13:1405-1409.
  • 4张小东,许克新,王晓峰,侯树坤.TURP在前列腺癌诊治中的作用评价[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2005,26(5):308-311. 被引量:36
  • 5Huggins C,Hodges C V.Studies on prostatic cancer:I.The effect of castration,of estrogen and of androgen injection on serum phosphatases in metastatic carcinoma of the prostate.1941[J].J Urol,2002,167(2 Pt 2):948-951;discussion 952.
  • 6Kaplan S A.Effects of intrathecal injection of tamsulosin and naftopidil,alpha-1A and ID adrenergie receptor antagonists,on bladder activity in rats[J].J Urol,2003,169:1612-1622.
  • 7Tubaro A,De Nunzio C,Mariani S.Reduction of prostate-specific antigen after tamsulosin treatment in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen and lower urinary tract symptoms associated with low incidence of prostate cancer at biopsy[J].Urology,2010,76:436-441.
  • 8Nasu K,Moriyama N,Fukasawa R,et.al.Quantification and distribution of alpha l-adrenoceptor subtype mRNAs in human prostate:comparison of benign hypertrophied tissue and non-hypertrophied tissue[J].Br J Pharmacol,1996,119:797-803.
  • 9Geenle R T,Hill-Harmon M B,Murray T,et al.Cancer statistics,2001[J].CA Cancer J Clin,2001,51(1):15-36.Erratum in:CA Cancer J Clin,2001,51(2):144.
  • 10Tsujii T.Comparison of prazosin,terazosin and tamsulosin in the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia:a short-term open,randomized multicenter study.BPH Medical Therapy Study Group.Benign prostatic hyperplasia[J].Int J Urol,2000,7:199-205.

二级参考文献13

  • 1Stephenson RA. Prostate cancer trends in the era of prostate specific antigen: an update of incidence, mortality, and clinical factors from the SEER database. Urol Clin North Am,2002,29:173 -181.
  • 2Horninger W, Reissigl A, Rogatsch H, et al. Prostate cancer screening in the Tyrol, Austria: experience and results. Eur J Cancer,2000,36:1322-1335.
  • 3Babaian RJ,Fritsche H, Ayala A,et al. Performance of a neural network in detecting prostate cancer in the prostate specific antigen reflex range of 2.5 to 4 ng/ml. Urology ,2000,56:1000-1006.
  • 4Roehl KA, Antenor JV,Catalona WJ. Serial biopsy results in prostate cancer screening study. J Urol,2002,167:2435-2439.
  • 5Djavan B,Mazal P,Zlotta A,et al. Pathological features of prostate cancer detected on initial and repeat prostate biopsy: results of the prospective European Prostate Cancer Detection study. Prostate,2001,47:111-117.
  • 6Pacelli A,Bostwick DG. Clinical significance of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in transurethral resection specimens. Urology, 1997,50:355-359.
  • 7Keetch DW, Catalona WJ. prostatic transition zone biopsies in men with previous negative biopsies and persistently elevated serum prostate specific antigen values. J Urol, 1995,154:1795-1797.
  • 8Onder AU,Yalcin V, Arar O, et al. impact of transition zone biopsies in detection and evaluation of prostate cancer. Eur Urol, 1998,33:542-548.
  • 9Niesel T, Breul J, Hartung R. Dignostic value of additional systematic prostate biopsies in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate. Urology, 1997,49: 869-873.
  • 10Zigeuner R,Schips L, Lipsky K, et al. Detection of prostate cancer by TURP or open surgery in patients with previously negative transrectal prostate biopsies. Urology, 2003,62: 883-8 87.

共引文献35

同被引文献47

引证文献6

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部