期刊文献+

缓解期抑郁症患者述情障碍与认知应对策略关系的初步研究 被引量:2

A primary study on the relationship between alexithymia and cognitive coping strategies for major depression in paracmasis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨缓解期抑郁症患者述情障碍与认知应对策略的特征及二者的关系.方法 采用多伦多述情量表(TAS-20)中文版、认知情绪调节问卷中文版(CERQ-C)对130例缓解期抑郁症患者进行评定,并与95例健康志愿者(对照组)比较.结果 (1)抑郁症组TAS-20总分及因子I、III分仍显著高于对照组,依次为(51.00±9.25)分vs(48.04±8.79)分、(16.97±5.46)分vs(15.90±4.26)分、(21.31±4.11)分vs(19.09±3.03)分,P<0.05或P<0.01.CERQ-C中责难自己、沉思、积极重新关注、理性分析、责难他人因子分低于对照组,接受、重新关注计划、积极重新评价因子分高于对照组,依次为(10.63±3.21)分vs(12.56±2.26)分、(9.72±3.13)分vs(12.01±2.44)分、(11.08±2.94)分vs(12.11±2.65)分、(8.88±3.07)分vs(11.66±2.41)分、(8.88±3.69)分vs(10.19±2.35)分、(13.26±3.67)分vs(12.56±2.26)分、(13.56±3.56)分vs(12.51±3.65)分、(13.81±4.06)分vs(12.47±3.70)分,P<0.01;(2)CERQ-C沉思、接受、责难他人等因子依次进入TAS-20总分的回归方程;自杀行为、医疗费用、抑郁总分等因子依次进入TAS-20因子I的回归方程;沉思因子、父母文化程度进入TAS-20因子II的回归方程; 接受、责难他人与积极评价因子等依次进入TAS-20因子III的回归方程.结论 缓解期抑郁症仍存在明显的述情障碍与不良的认知应对策略.述情障碍的不同纬度影响因素不同,不适应性的应对策略可能仍为缓解期抑郁症患者述情障碍重要的影响因素. Objective To investigate the characteristics of alexithymia and cognitive emotion regulation and the relationship between the two symptoms in major depressive patients in pracmasis. Methods One hundred and thirty major depression patients in paracmasis were assessed with the Chinese version of Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ--C) and the twenty--item Toronto Scale (TAS--20). Ninty--five healthy people were included as controls. Results Compared with healthy controls, the depression patients showed significantly higher scores in the total score of TAS-20, TAS-20 I and III factor scores (P〈0.05 or P〈0.01),lower scores in self blame, rumination, positive refocusing, perspective, blaming, and higher scores in acceptance, planning, and reappraisal of CERQ--C (P 0.01). The CERQ-C factor of rumination,acceptance, and blaming entered the regression equation for total score of TAS--20 in turn. The factor of Suicidal behavior, medical cost and total score of BDI entered the regression equation for TAS--20 I in turn. Rumination and parents/ education years entered the regression equation for TAS--20 II. Acceptance, blaming and reapprasial of CERQ--C entered the regression equation for TAS-- 20 III in turn. Conclusions Major depression in paracmasis still suffered from significant alexithymia and poor cognitive coping strategies. The influential factors contributing to three dimension of alexithymia were different. Poor cognitive coping strategies may be still responsible for alexithymia in major depression patients in paracmasis.
出处 《神经疾病与精神卫生》 2010年第6期577-580,共4页 Journal of Neuroscience and Mental Health
关键词 抑郁症 述情障碍 认知应对 Depression Alexithymia Cognitive-coping
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Taylor GJ,Bagby RM,Parker JDA.Disorder of affect regulation:Alexithymia in Medical and Psychiatric Illness[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1997.
  • 2Motan I,Gen(c)(o)z T.The Relationship Between the Dimensions of Alexithymia and the Intensity of Depression and Anxiety[J].Turk Psikiyatri Derg,2007,18(4):333-343.
  • 3Ogrodniczuk JS,Piper WE,Joyce AS.Alexithymia as a predictor of residual symptoms in depressed patients who respond to short-term psychotherapy[J].Am J Psychother,2004,58(2):150-161.
  • 4Garnefski N,Rieffe C,Jellesma F,et al.Cognitive emotion regulation strategies and emotional problems in 9-11-year-old children:the development of an instrument[J].Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry,2007,16(1):1-9.
  • 5Garnefski N,Kraaij V.Relationships between cognitive emotion regulation strategies and depressive symptoms:A comparative study of five specific samples[J].Personality and Individual Differences,2006,40(8):1659-1669.
  • 6李武,胡春凤,任巧玲,张增,张金响,张欣,周玉萍,李龙飞,翟金国,韩鹏.抑郁症患者短期治疗前后述情障碍的研究[J].中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2009,18(1):37-39. 被引量:5
  • 7汪向东.心理卫生评定量表手册[M]增订版[M].北京:中国心理卫生杂志出版社,1999.120-129.
  • 8蚁金瑶,姚树桥,朱熊兆.TAS-20中文版的信度、效度分析[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2003,17(11):763-767. 被引量:297
  • 9朱熊兆,罗伏生,姚树桥,Randy P.Auerbach,JohnR.Z.Abela.认知情绪调节问卷中文版(CERQ-C)的信效度研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2007,15(2):121-124. 被引量:253
  • 10Garnefski N,Kraaij,V,Spinhoven P.Negative life events,cognitive emotion regulation and emotional problems[J].Personality and Individual Differences,2001,30(8):1311-1327.

二级参考文献41

  • 1朱熊兆,胡绍云,蚁金瑶,姚树桥,门连心.抑郁发作患者的述情障碍特征[J].中国行为医学科学,2005,14(12):1073-1074. 被引量:18
  • 2林海程,李刚,钟天平,薛玫,梁勇,陈优康,钟卫芳,谢小芬.服刑女犯人人格特征与述情障碍的关系[J].中国行为医学科学,2006,15(1):54-56. 被引量:11
  • 3[1]Sifneos PE. The prevalence of alexithymic characteristics in psychosomatic patients. Psychotherapy and psychosomatics. 1973,22:255~262.
  • 4[2]Taylor GJ, Bagby RM, Parker JDA. Disorder of affect regulation. Cambridge University Press, 1997.
  • 5[4]Bagby RM, Parker JDA, Taylor GJ. The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale-I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. J Psychosom Res. 1994,38:23~32.
  • 6[5]Simonsson-Sarnecki M, Lundh LG, Bagby RM. A Swedish translation of 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale:Cross-validation of the factor structure. Scandinavian Journal of psychology. 2000,41:25~30.
  • 7[6]Powers DE.Coaching for the SAT: Summary for the summaries and update. Educational Measurement. 1993,12(2):24~39.
  • 8[7]Taylor GJ, Ryan D, Bagby RM. Taward the development of a new self-report alexithymia scale. Psychother Psychosom 1985,44:191~199.
  • 9[8]Taylor GJ, Bagby RM, Parker JDA. The revised Toronto Alexithymia Scale: some reliability,validity and normative data. Psychother Psychosom.1992,52:34~41.
  • 10[9]Haviland MG, Hendryx MS. Multidimensionality and state dependence of alexithymia in recently sober alcoholics. J Nerv Dis . 1991,179:284~290.

共引文献1380

同被引文献14

引证文献2

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部