期刊文献+

L_(4、5)侧路单枚cage椎间融合术式的生物力学及临床研究 被引量:9

Biomechanical and Clinical Study of L_(4、5) Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Single Anatomical Threaded Cage
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价L4、5侧路单枚椎间融合器融合术式的稳定性及力学合理性。方法建立L4、5侧路与后路单枚椎间融合器融合术式的三维有限元模型及小牛脊柱模型,测定二者的位移变化。临床随访2003年12月~2006年12月行侧路单枚椎间融合器融合术式33例,评价腰痛改善率。结果实验显示侧路模型的稳定性优于后路模型。临床研究显示手术有效率100%,腰痛改善率93.94%,患者满意率100%。结论侧路植入单枚椎间融合器融合术式是一种微创的术式,不使用椎弓根固定系统而又能够提供足够的术后即刻生物力学刚度,是一种合理有效的腰椎椎间融合术式。 Objective To evaluate the relative stability of L4、5 lateral lumbar interbody fusion using single anatomical threaded cage.Methods Twelve calf spine models and dimensional element models of lateral and posterior approach were established.Pure moment and forces were applied to the top of spinal column.The motion range of all the specimens was measured during the experiment.The improvement rate of lumbar pain in 33 patients who took operation from Dec.2003 to Dec.2006 was evaluated.Results The stability in lateral group was superior to posterior group.The effective rate of operation was 100%.The improvement rate of lumbar pain was 93.94%.The patients’s satisfactory rate was 100%.Conclusion Interbody fusion of L4、5 through lateral approach using single anatomical threaded cage without internal fixation is a mini-invasive operation process.It can provide instant posterior biomechanical stiffness.It is an effective operation process of interbody fusion in lumbar.
出处 《中国骨与关节损伤杂志》 2011年第1期25-28,共4页 Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint Injury
基金 福建省自然科学基金计划资助项目(Z0512014)
关键词 椎间融合 生物力学 腰椎 Interbody fusion Biomechanics Lumbar
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献19

  • 1李危石,陈仲强,郭昭庆,齐强,刘忠军.椎间植骨融合与横突间植骨融合治疗腰椎滑脱症的比较[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2005,15(1):20-23. 被引量:113
  • 2杨俊,李大刚,郭元利,尤元璋,吴志伟.腰椎椎间融合器临床应用的中期疗效观察[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2006,21(2):111-112. 被引量:6
  • 3陈卓夫,彭霞舞,杨巍,张斌,龚辉.GSS Ⅲ代后路复位固定椎体间融合治疗Ⅰ、Ⅱ度腰椎滑脱[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2007,22(1):44-45. 被引量:2
  • 4McKenna PJ, Freeman BJ, Mulholland RC, et al. A prospective, randomised controlled trial of femoral ring allograft versus atitanium cage in circumferential lumbar spinal fusion withminimum 2 - year clinical results. Eur Spine J, 2005, 14 (8) : 727
  • 5Kim KT, Lee SH, Lee YH, et al. Clinical outcomes of 3 fusion methods through the posterior approach in the lumbar spine. Spine, 2006, 31 (12): 1351
  • 6Min JH, Jang JS, Lee SH. Comparison of anterior- and posterior -approach instrumented lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine, 2007, 7 (1): 21
  • 7Hsieh PC, Koski TR, O'Shaughnessy BA, et al. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion in comparison with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: implications for the restoration of foraminal height, local disc angle, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal balance. J Neurosurg Spine, 2007, 7 (4): 379
  • 8Choi JY, Choi YW, Sung KH. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion in patients with a previous diseectomy : minimum 2 - year follow - up. J Spinal DisordTech, 2005, 18 (4): 347
  • 9Brau SA. Mini - open approach to the spine for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: description of the procedure, results and complications. The Spine Journal, 2002, 2 (3): 216
  • 10Kabins MB, Weinstein JN,Spratt KF,et al.Isolated L4.5 fusions using the variable screw placement system: unilateral versus bilateral.J Spinal Disord,1992,5:39.

共引文献92

同被引文献76

引证文献9

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部