期刊文献+

上海市高校高水平田径队培养模式的比较分析——以复旦、华东师范大学以及上海体育学院田径队为例 被引量:1

Comprative analysis on the training model of Shanghai colleges' high-level track and filed teams——Cases of Fudan University,ECNU and Shanghai Athletic College
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在文献阅读、专家访谈以及问卷调查的基础上,对复旦大学田径队"自主培养"模式、华东师范大学田径队"联合培养"模式和上海体育学院田径队"一条龙培养"三种不同的培养模式进行比较与分析。上述三所高校田径队在培养高水平田径运动员的方式上各有特色,并都取得了一定的成绩。但通过研究和比较发现,三所高校田径队在培养模式上也存在着一些欠缺。鉴于我国田径水平的发展以及高校竞技体育发展的趋势,应该尽快探索出一套符合上海高校高水平田径队的培养模式,培养出更多的高水平运动员。 Based on literature review,expert interview and questionnaire survey,this research compared and analyzed three different training models of high-level track and field team in Shanghai,including Fudan university's "independent training" model,East China Normal University's "joint training" model and Shanghai Athletic College's "package training".These three college track and field teams differ in the training models and all of them have made some success.However,through comparative analysis in the research,it seems that all the three models have some flaws.In view of the development of China's track and filed and the tendency of college competitive sports,we should find a training model that accords with Shanghai colleges' high-level track and field teams as soon as possible,so that we can train more high-level athletes.
作者 杨峻 于兴波
出处 《山东体育科技》 2010年第4期66-68,共3页 Shandong Sports Science & Technology
关键词 上海高校 高水平田径队 培养模式 比较分析 Shanghai colleges high-level track and field team training model comparative analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献16

共引文献156

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部