期刊文献+

论美国环境公民诉讼制度中的原告资格 被引量:2

On the Plaintiff Qualifications in American Citizens Litigation System of Environment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国环境公民诉讼制度的核心是相当宽泛的原告资格的确定,其精髓在于鼓励普通公民对与自身无直接利益关联的环境违法行为提起诉讼,以监督环境执法和促进环境法律的实施;为限制公民或环保团体滥用诉权,美国法律明确规定了公民诉讼的适用范围、可诉对象和禁止诉讼的事项。 The core of American citizen litigation system of environment is the rather broad determination of plaintiff qualifications,and its essence is to encourage ordinary citizens to litigate environment crimes which are not in direct interest of them,so as to promote and supervise the enforcement of environment laws.In order to avoid the abuse of suit right of citizens and green groups,American law explicitly stipulates the application scope,the object and the legal issues of citizen suits.
作者 张颖
出处 《湖南工业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2010年第6期13-16,共4页 Journal of Hunan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)
基金 湖南省教育厅青年项目"环境公益诉讼制度研究"(10B027)
关键词 公民诉讼 原告资格 环境保护 citizen litigation system plaintiff qualification environmental protection
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1让·文森塞尔·金沙尔.法国民事诉讼要义[M].北京:中国检察出版社,2003:171.
  • 2张怡,王慧.美国现代环境司法价值观演变及其启示[J].河北法学,2007,25(4):42-47. 被引量:5
  • 3瓮岳生.行政诉讼法逐条释义[M].台北:五南图书出版公司,2004.129.
  • 4陈冬.美国联邦环境法律层面的公民诉讼--种静态的考察[EB/OL].[2008-01-14]http://jyw.znufe.edu.cn/hjfyjw/Article/2008-1/2008114225023262.html.

二级参考文献21

  • 1[美]罗杰·W·芬德利,丹尼尔·A·法伯.环境法概要[M].杨广俊,等,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1997.
  • 2Robert J.Brulle,"Federal Regulation in Historical Perspective",38 Stan.L.Rev.1189,1298 (1986).
  • 3Richard J.Lazarus,The Making of Environmental Law,The University of Chicago Press,2004,p98,113-114,137,245,242.
  • 4Antonin Scalia,"The Doctrine of Standing as an Essential Element of the Separation of Powers",17Suffolk U.L.Rev.881,884,897(1983).
  • 5Frank B.Cross and Emerson H.Tiller,"Judicial Partisanship and Obedience to Legal Doctrine:Whistleblowing on the Federal Courts of Appeals," 107Yale L.J.2155,2175(1998).
  • 6Richard J.Pierce Jr,"Is Standing Law or Politics?"77N.C.L.Rev.1741,1760(1999).
  • 7John Wiley,A Capture Theory of Antitrust Federalism,99Harv L Rev713,723(1986).
  • 8Daniel A.Farber&Philip P.Frickey,The Jurisprudence of Public Choice,65Tex L Rev873.See Robert Glicksman and Christopher H Schroeder,"EPA and the Courts:Twenty Years of Law and Politics",54Law Contemp.Probs.249,257(1991).
  • 9John P.Dwyer,The Pathology of Symbolic Legislation,17Econ L Q 233,236(1990).
  • 10Richard J.Lazarus,The Making of Environmental Law,The University of Chicago Press,2004.

共引文献5

同被引文献9

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部