期刊文献+

椎弓根螺钉内固定并椎间Cage植骨治疗腰椎滑脱症 被引量:2

Treatment of lumber spondylolisthesis by using pedicle screw and interbody fusion cage
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 观察后路椎弓根螺钉内固定联合椎间Cage植骨融合治疗腰椎滑脱症的手术疗效,并与椎间单纯颗粒植骨融合术进行对比分析.方法 2006年8月至2009年1月对46例腰椎滑脱症患者采用椎弓根钉棒系统复位内固定治疗,其中椎间Cage植骨组(A组)24例,椎间单纯自体骨粒打压植骨组(B组)22例.术前、术后随访期间拍摄X线片测量腰椎滑脱复位率、相对椎间隙高度以及腰骶角的变化,观察融合节段的融合率,并且按照日本矫形外科学会(JOA)的下腰痛评分标准进行临床疗效评价.结果 通过手术复位所有患者的腰腿疼痛症状得到缓解,且在随访18个月时显示A组滑脱复位率为94.7%、相对椎间隙高度为(74.93±7.85)%、腰骶角为36.6°±3.6°,B组分别为89.9%、(68.72±12.40)%、39.3°±5.6°,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05).A组植骨融合率为95.83%(23/24),B组植骨融合率为90.91%(20/22),两组比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05).结论 采用椎弓根螺钉内固定联合椎间Cage植骨融合治疗腰椎滑脱症可有效防止腰椎滑脱复位丢失,中远期疗效明显,是治疗腰椎滑脱症较理想的方法. Objective To observe the therapeutical effect by using pedicle screw and interbody fusion cage,and compare with posterior interbody simple autogenous bone graft. Methods From August 2006 to January 2009,46 cases of lumbar spondylolisthesis patients were treated by using pedical screw internal fixation system, including 24 cases of cage-graft (group A), 22 cases of interbody simple autogenous bone graft (group B), efficacy evaluation using JOA evaluation standard, and measured lumbar olisthe reset rate, relative intervertebral space height and lumbosacral angle of recovery and observed fusion rate through the preoperative and postoperative follow-up X-ray films. Results All the patients' waist pain symptoms relieved after operative reduction. At 18 months of follow-up , group A of lumbar olisthe reset rate was 94.7%, relative intervertebral space height was (74.93 ± 7.85)% ,lumhosacral angle was 36.6° ± 3.6° ,meanwhile group B was 89.9%, (68.72 ± 12.40)%,39.3°± 5.6°. There were significant differences between two groups (P〈0.05). Bone graft fusion rate in group A was 95.83% (23/24), in group B was 90.91%(20/22), there was significant difference between two groups (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion Pedicle screw system and interbody cage-graft in treatnent of lumber spondylolisthesis can effectively prevent the loss of reduction,mid and long-term effects are satisfactory,it is a stable and reliable method.
出处 《中国医师进修杂志》 2011年第2期16-19,共4页 Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
关键词 脊椎前移 植骨 复位率 Spondylolisthesis Bone transplantation Reset rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献23

  • 1周秉文.Low Back Pain≠下腰痛[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2005,15(6):333-333. 被引量:1
  • 2鲍磊,周雪峰,王燕,马华松.青年军人下腰痛病因分析及相关问题[J].西北国防医学杂志,2005,26(4):294-295. 被引量:1
  • 3鲍铁周,莫奇洛斯.从腰骶角差异看下腰痛的发病机制[J].中医正骨,2005,17(8):25-26. 被引量:5
  • 4高国勇,镇万新,杨大志,王多,刘洪涛,徐亮.椎间融合器结合椎弓根内固定治疗腰椎滑脱症[J].新乡医学院学报,2007,24(4):385-387. 被引量:6
  • 5Lin PM. Posterior lumbar interbodv fusion technique,compli-cations and pitfalls[J].Clin Orthop,1985,193 :90-102.
  • 6Verlooy J, De Smedt K,Selosse P.Failme of a modified poste-rior lumbar interbody fusion technique to produce adequate pain relief in isthmie spondylolytie grade 1 spondylolisthesis patients[J].Spine, 1993,18(11) : 1491-1495.
  • 7Suk S,Lee CK,Kim WJ,et al. Adding posterior lumbar inter-bodv fusion to pediele screw fixation and posterolateral fusion after decompression in spondylolytic spnndylolisthesis [J].Spine, 1997,22 (2) : 210-220.
  • 8Schlegel KF,Pon A,Biomechanics of posterior lumbar interbody fusion in spondylolisthesis[J].Clin Orthop, 1985,193:115-119.
  • 9Madan S, Boeree NR.Outcome of posterior interbodv fusion versus posterolateral fusion for spond?,lolytie spondylolisthesis[J].Spine, 2002,27 ( 14 ) : 1536-1542.
  • 10Nork SE,Hu SS,Workrnan KI,et al. Patient outcome after de-compression and instrumented posterior spinal Iusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis[J].Spine. 1999,24(6) :561-569.

共引文献183

同被引文献17

  • 1谭俊铭,叶晓健,冯水云,袁文,梁再跃,贾连顺,何海龙,李家顺.腰椎峡部裂及椎体滑脱的手术治疗选择[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2005,20(12):805-807. 被引量:11
  • 2刘熹,刘浩.腰椎峡部裂手术治疗的研究进展[J].颈腰痛杂志,2006,27(4):323-326. 被引量:6
  • 3Floman Y,Millgram MA,Ashkenazi E,et al.Instrumented slip reduction and fusion for painful unstable isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults.J Spinal Disord Tech,2008,21(7):477-483.
  • 4Henderson ED.Results of the surgical treatment of spondylolisthesis.J Bone Joint Surg Am,1966,48(4):619-642.
  • 5La Rosa G,Conti A,Cacciola F,et al.Pedicle screw fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis:does posterior lumbar interbody fusion improve outcome over posterolateral fusion? J Neurosurg,2003,99(2 Suppl):S143-150.
  • 6Kumar R,Niall D,Walsh A,et al.Spina bifida occulta in isthmic spondylolisthesis:a surgical trap.Eur Spine J,2002,11(2):159-161.
  • 7Goyal N,Wimberley DW,Hyatt A,et al.Radiographic and clinical outcomes after instrumented reduction and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion of mid and high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis.J Spinal Disord Tech,2009,22(5):321-327.
  • 8Mays S.Spondylolysis,spondylolisthesis,and lumbo-sacral morphology in a medieval English skeletal population.Am J Phys Anthropol,2006,131(3):352-362.
  • 9Parker SL,Adogwa O,Paul AR,et al.Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain,disability,and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis[J].J Neurosurg Spine,2011,14(5):598-604.
  • 10Na Kai O,Ookawa A,Yamaura I.Long-term rentgenographic and functional changes in patients who were treated with wide fenestration for central lumbar stenosis[J].J Bone Joint Surg(Am),1991,73(8):1184-1191.

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部