期刊文献+

我国城镇居民对CO_2减排的支付意愿调查研究 被引量:25

China urban resident's willingness to pay for carbon dioxide emission reductions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 运用权变评价法(CVM)调查了我国城镇居民对CO2减排的支付意愿.结果表明,我国城镇居民愿意为到2050年全球CO2减排30%而每年支付132元;减排60%而每年支付216元;减排85%而每年支付264元.一般线性回归模型分析结果显示,城镇居民的受教育程度、家庭年收入、职业类型、所在城市、对气候变化的认知程度和环境意识,都对CO2减排的支付意愿有显著影响;而且不同的CO2减排成本分配方案对人们的支付意愿也有显著影响。 The factors which affect Chinese urban resident's willingness to pay(WTP) for CO2 emission reductions were investigated by using contingent valuation method(CVM).China urban resident's WTP was 132 yuan/year for reducing CO2 emissions by 30% until the year 2050,216 yuan/year for a reduction of 60%,and 264 yuan/year for a reduction of 85%.Through the general regression model analysis,it was found that the urban resident's education level,household's annual per capita income,job type,city location,cognitive level on climate change and environmental awareness were closely correlated with the WTP,and how the costs for reducing CO2 emissions should be shared among countries also had significant impact on the WTP.
作者 曾贤刚
出处 《中国环境科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第2期346-352,共7页 China Environmental Science
基金 国家社会科学基金资助项目(10BJY049) 中国人民大学科学研究基金项目(10XNJ013)
关键词 CO2减排 支付意愿 权变评价法 一般线性回归模型 CO2 emission reductions willingness to pay contingent valuation method general regression model
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Carson R T, Mitchell R C, Hanemann M, et al. Contingent Valuation and lost Passive Use: Damages from the Exxon Valdez oil spill [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2003,25: 257-286.
  • 2Carson R T, Hanemann W. Contingent valuation-handbook of environment economics [M]. M. Elsevier, 2005:824-826.
  • 3Lee J J, Cameron T A. Popular Support for Climate Change Mitigation: Evidence from a General Population Mail Survey [J]. Environ. Resource Econ., 2008,41:223-248.
  • 4Viseusi W K, Zeckhauser R J. The perception and valuation of the risks of climate change: a rational and behavioral blend [J]. Climatic Change, 2006,77:151 - 177.
  • 5Burghart D R, Cameron T A, Gerdes G R. Valuing publicly sponsored research projects: risks, scenario adjustments, and inattention [J]. Journal of Risk Uncertainty, 2007,35:77-105.
  • 6Cameron T A, Crawford G D. Independent dimensions of sociodemographic variability in neighborhood characteristics at the tract level of the 2000 census [R]. Eugene, OR: Department of Economics, University of Oregon, 2003:35.
  • 7Cai B, Cameron T A, Gerdes G R. Distributional preferences and the incidence of costs and benefits in environmental policy [R]. Eugene OR: Department of Economics, University of Oregon, 2007: 45.
  • 8Hersch J, Viscusi W K. The generational divide in support for environmental policies: European evidence [J]. Climatic Change, 2006,77:121-136.
  • 9张茵,蔡运龙.条件估值法评估环境资源价值的研究进展[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2005,41(2):317-328. 被引量:128
  • 10曾贤刚,王克,程磊磊,孙发平.三江源区生态资源非使用价值评价[J].中国环境科学,2009,29(6):589-593. 被引量:15

二级参考文献84

共引文献229

同被引文献437

引证文献25

二级引证文献142

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部