期刊文献+

财务分析师能认知审计任期的信息内涵吗? 被引量:17

原文传递
导出
摘要 本文以2005-2006年度中国沪深A股市场中被出具标准无保留审计意见的上市公司为研究对象,考察了财务分析师(简称分析师)是如何认知审计任期所内含的审计质量。我们的研究发现,审计任期对分析师预测盈余的持续性具有一个正向影响,这一影响在方向上同审计任期对公司实际盈余持续性的影响一致。这表明在分析师眼里,审计任期越长审计质量越高,同时也表明他们能正确地认知审计任期的信息内涵。然而,我们进一步研究发现,分析师虽然能正确地认知审计任期的信息内涵,但是其认知存在着过度反应。
出处 《会计研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第1期90-94,共5页 Accounting Research
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(项目批准号:70972061) 教育部人文社科重点研究基地基金(项目批准号:06JJD630015) 上海财经大学211工程第三期项目的资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1陈信元,夏立军.审计任期与审计质量:来自中国证券市场的经验证据[J].会计研究,2006(1):44-53. 被引量:224
  • 2李东平,黄德华,王振林.“不清洁”审计意见、盈余管理与会计师事务所变更[J].会计研究,2001(6):51-57. 被引量:242
  • 3刘启亮.事务所任期与审计质量——来自中国证券市场的经验证据[J].审计研究,2006(4):40-49. 被引量:83
  • 4Ahmed A. , Lobo G. , Zhang X.. 2000. Do Analysts Under - react to Bad News and Over - react to Good News?. Working paper.
  • 5Brown L. D. , Michael S. Rozeff. 1978. The Superiority of Analyst Forecasts As Measures of Expectations: Evidence from Earnings. The Journal of Finance, 33:1 - 16.
  • 6DeAgelo L. E.. 1981. Audit Size and Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3 : 183 - 199.
  • 7Debondt Werner, Richard Thaler. 1985. Does the Stock Market Overreact? The Journal of Finance, 40:793 - 805.
  • 8Debondt Werner, Richard Thaler. 1990. Do Security Analysts Overreact?. American Economic Review, 80 (2) : 52 - 57.
  • 9Easterwood John C. , Stacey R. Nutt. 1999. Inefficiency in Analysts' Earnings Forecasts: Systematic Misreaction or Systematic Optimism?. The Journal of Finance, 5:1777 - 1797.
  • 10Ghosh A. , D. Moon. 2005. Auditor Tenure and Perceptions of Audit Quality. The Accounting Review, 80 (2) : 585 -612.

二级参考文献56

  • 1夏立军,陈信元,方轶强.审计任期与审计独立性:来自中国证券市场的经验证据[J].中国会计与财务研究,2005,7(1):54-101. 被引量:58
  • 2吴水澎,刘启亮.会计制度 公共领域与会计职业道德[J].会计研究,2005(11):3-7. 被引量:21
  • 3DeFond, M. and C. Park. 1997. Smoothing Income in Anticipation of Future Earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 23 (July): 115-139.
  • 4Francis J. R. , Maydew E. L. and Sparks H. C. 1999. The Role of Big 6 Auditors in the Credible Reporting of Accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theoryl8 (Fall) : 17 - 34.
  • 5Geiger M. A. and Raghunandan K. 2002. Auditor Tenure and Audit Reporting Failures, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory (Mar.) : 67 - 78.
  • 6General Accounting Office (GAO) 2003. Public Accounting Firms: Required Study on the Potential Effects of Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation, http: //www. gao. gov.
  • 7Heninger W. G. 2001. The Association between Auditor Litigation and Abnormal Accruals. The Accounting Review 76 (January) : 111-126.
  • 8Mansi S. A. , Maxwell W. F. and Miller D. P. 2004. Does Auditor Quality and Tenure Matter to Investors? Evidence from the Bond Market. Journal of Accounting Research (Forthcoming).
  • 9Mautz R. K. and Sharaf H. A. 1961. The Philosophy of Auditing. American Accounting Association Monograph No. 6. Sarasota , FL : American Accounting Association.
  • 10Myers J. N. , Myers L. A. , and Omer T. C. 2003. Exploring the Term of the Auditor-Client Relationship and the Quality of Earnings : A Case for Mandatory Auditor Rotation? The Accounting Review 78 : 779 - 799.

共引文献490

同被引文献258

引证文献17

二级引证文献116

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部