期刊文献+

递延所得税的合理性辨析 被引量:12

Debate over the Rationality of Deferred Income Tax
原文传递
导出
摘要 递延所得税的会计规则操作成本巨大而益处甚微,是最令人费解的会计规则之一。本文发现,递延所得税的计算规则缺乏理论依据和实践基础,它是公共会计师行业为了自身利益而设计的金融分析规则。为确保会计信息的公益性和公信力,会计规则和税收法规之间应当进一步加强协调,不能放任二者差异的扩大。会计立法应当要求企业严格遵循依法记账原则,采用应付税款法记载其真实纳税额,同时在附注中披露会计处理与税收法规之间的主要差异,不得在报表中提供主观预期数据。如此,可妥善解决"让最大多数的会计报表读者了解企业的法律事实和真实业绩"和"为确有需要的读者提供预期信息"之间的矛盾。 The accounting for deferred income tax is one of the most onerous accounting rules which are lack of theoretical basis and practical basis and have little benefits. The concept of deferred income tax was designed by public accounting profession for its own benefits. In order to ensure the credibility of financial statements, accounting legislation should coordinate with tax acts requiring companies follow fundamental laws and use the tax-payablemethod to record their income tax expense. The differences between accounting rules and tax acts can be disclosed in footnotes. By thus, financial statements could present legal facts and real corporate performance which are vital to most readers and present expected information which is deemed useful by some investors as well.
作者 周华
出处 《经济管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第2期182-193,共12页 Business and Management Journal ( BMJ )
基金 国家社会科学基金青年项目"金融衍生工具的交易策略机理及其会计监管法规研究"(07CJY011) 财政部"全国会计领军后备人才(学术类)"项目 教育部"国家级教学团队"项目支持
关键词 递延所得税 所得税费用 金融分析 法律事实 纳税影响会计法 deferred income tax reported income tax financial analysis legal facts tax-effect accounting
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1Arnett, Harold E. Taxable Income vs. Financial Income: How Much Uniformity Can We Stand? [ J ]. The Accounting Review, 1969,44,3, (Jul.) :482 -494.
  • 2Coughlan, John W. Tax Reductions and Tax Deferrals [ J ]. The Journal of Business, 1958, 31, 2, ( Apr. ) : 121 - 131.
  • 3Cox, Robert G. Conflicting Concepts of Income for Managerial and Federal Income Tax Purposes [ J ]. The Accounting Review, 1958,33,2, ( Apr. ) :242 - 245.
  • 4Defliese, Philip L. Deferred Taxes : More Fatal Flaws [ J ]. Accounting Horizons, 1991,5,1, ( Mar. ) : 89 - 91.
  • 5Defliese, Philip L. , Paul Rosenfield, William C. Dent. Professional Notes : Deferred Taxes--Forever/Reply [J]. Journal of Accountancy, 1983,156,2, (Aug) :94 - 103.
  • 6Drinkwater, David, James D. Edwards. The Nature of Taxes and the Matching Principle [ J ]. The Accounting Review, 1965, 40,3, (Jul.) :579 -582.
  • 7Flegm, Eugene H. , Donald J. Kirk. Commentary on the Limitations of Accounting [ J ]. Accounting Horizons, 1989,3,3, (Sep) :90 - 97.
  • 8Gnanakumar Visvanathan. Deferred Tax Valuation Allowances and Earnings Management [ J ]. Journal of Financial Statement Analysis, 1998,3,4, (Summer) :6 - 15.
  • 9Graham, Willard J. Income Tax Allocation [ J ]. The Accounting Review, 1959,34,1, ( Jan. ) : 14 - 27.
  • 10Miller, Herbert E. How Much Income Tax Allocation? [ J ]. Journal of Accountancy, 1962,114,2, (Aug) :46 - 51.

二级参考文献21

  • 1颜延.会计改革的法律背景初探[J].会计研究,2006(5):12-16. 被引量:10
  • 2黄菊波,杨小舟.评财务会计与税务会计的分离问题[J].会计研究,1996(4):1-5. 被引量:26
  • 3罗森.《财政学》.中国人民大学出版社,2001年版.
  • 4马寅初.《财政理论与中国财政--理论与现实》.商务印书馆,1956年版.
  • 5乔恩.《货币史》.商务印书馆,2002年版.
  • 6斯蒂格利茨.《喧嚣的九十年代》.中国金融出版社,2005年版.
  • 7周谷城.《世界通史》.河北教育出版社,2002年版.
  • 8Nobes, Christopher and Robert Parker,Comparative International Accounting. 8^th Edition, Pearson Education,2004.
  • 9SEC,Study Pursuant to Section 108(d) of the Sarbanes--Oxley Act of 2002 on the Adoption by the United States Financial Reporting System of a Principle--Based Accounting System,2003.
  • 10Zeff, Stephen A. ,The Evolution of U. S. GAAP:The Political Forces Behind Professional Standards. The CPA Journal, January,2005, pp. 18-27; February,2005, pp. 18-29.

共引文献42

同被引文献67

引证文献12

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部