期刊文献+

软件产品族构件演化及其复杂度评价 被引量:3

Evolution of software product family component and its complexity evaluation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于现有构件以演化方式产生出新的构件是提高软件复用水平和满足用户不断变化需求的关键技术。首先,给出了一种基于多个代理的构件演化交互模型,该模型能够以自治方式实现演化一致性数据处理;其次,利用方面织入机制将新的功能代码准确织入现有构件内部,降低了构件不同功能代码的耦合度;然后,对构件演化的复杂度进行了讨论,给出了四项演化复杂度评价指标和一个复杂度计算模型,以对构件演化成本进行量化估算;最后,以数字化校园中各应用系统间数据交换构件演化为例,证明了方法的可行性和有效性。 Evolving new software component based on previous software components is a key technique to improve software reusability and satisfy users' various demands. In this paper, an interactive evolution model was proposed based on multiple Agents, which could autonomously process consistent data. Then, the aspect weaving mechanism, which can effectively reduce the coupling degree of different function areas, was introduced in evolution to insert new codes into the exact places of target component. Furthermore, the evolution complexity was also discussed and several indicators and a model were given to calculate evolution cost. Finally, a data exchange component used in digital campus system was given to illustrate the effectiveness of above evolution methods.
出处 《计算机应用》 CSCD 北大核心 2011年第3期826-830,共5页 journal of Computer Applications
基金 浙江省自然科学基金资助项目(Y106603)
关键词 软件产品族构件 构件演化 代码织入 演化复杂度 software product family component component evolution code weaving evolution complexity
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献102

共引文献532

同被引文献40

  • 1周海光,郭富德.“7·23”大暴雨动力机理的双多普勒雷达反演[J].南京气象学院学报,2005,28(4):468-476. 被引量:10
  • 2郁湧,柳青,李彤,彭斌,李虎群.基于反馈的软件演化过程模型[J].计算机应用研究,2007,24(6):15-17. 被引量:3
  • 3HUUSKONEN A J. A method for monitoring the calibration and pointing accuracy of a radar network [ C]// Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Radar Meteorology. Seattle: American Meteorology Society, 2001:29-31.
  • 4SALTIKOFF E, HUUSKONEN A, HOHTI H, et al. Quality assur- ance in the FMI Doppler weather radar network [ J]. Boreal Environ- ment Research, 2010, 15(6): 579-594.
  • 5HUUSKONEN A J, HOHTI H, KUITUNEN T, et at. Weather ra- dar pointing and calibration level adjustment by solar observations and pair-wise comparison of reflectivity [ C]//Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Radar in Meteorology and Hydrology. Sib- iu, Romania: Romania National Meteorological Administration, 2010:121 - 126.
  • 6TABARY P. Efforts to improve the monitoring of the French radar network [ C]// Proceedings of the 31 st International Conference on Radar Meteorology. Seattle: American Meteorology Society, 2003, 482 - 485.
  • 7DELOBBE L, HOLLEMAN I. Quality of echo top products and de- rived probability of hail as a function of range [ C]//Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Radar in Meteorology and Hydrolo- gy. Got.land, Sweden: Copernicus GmbH, 2004:87-90.
  • 8GOURLEY J J, KANEY B, MADDOX R A. Evaluating the calibra- tions of radars: a software approach [ C]// Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Radar Meteorology. Seattle: American Meteorology Society, 2003:459-462.
  • 9BURGESS D W, FRESCH M A. The ROC/NSSL technology trans- fer MOU: a success story in radar applications technology transfer [ C] // Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Interac- tive Information Processing Systems for Meteorology, Oceanography, and Hydrology. Seattle: American Meteorology Society, 2006:92 - 94.
  • 10ZHANG J, LANGSTON C, HOWARD K, et al. Three-dimensional radar mosaic integrating WSR-88Ds and Canadian radar network [ C] // Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Aviation, Range and Aerospace Meteorology. Seattle: American Meteorology Society, 2008:44 - 48.

引证文献3

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部