期刊文献+

基于符号模型检测的SDG模型可诊断性验证 被引量:2

Formal verification of SDG diagnosability via symbolic model checking
下载PDF
导出
摘要 由于定量信息和非线性因果关系的丢失,符号有向图(signed directed graph,SDG)模型的可诊断性需要进一步地进行校核与验证。为此,提出了基于符号模型检测的SDG模型可诊断性形式化验证方法。首先定义了SDG模型的有限状态变迁系统形式化描述,建立了符号模型验证器(symbolic model verifier,SMV)模型;其次利用SDG的深层知识,构造了可诊断性函数,设定了可诊断性上下文,给出了可诊断性定义。然后,构造了SDG耦合孪生SMV模型,定义了可诊断性的计算树时态逻辑公式,提出了验证算法SDGD_CSMV。最后,通过一个实例验证了可诊断性的判定和算法的有效性。 Because of quantitative and nonlinear causal information,diagosability of the signed directed graph(SDG) model needs to be further verified and validated.A formal verification approach to diagnosability via symbolic model checking is proposed.A formal characterization of SDG,as a finite state transition system,is transformed firstly,and a symbolic model verifier(SMV) module is modeled.In the framework of the finite state transition system,a diagnosis function is established,and then the diagnosable definition of a diagnosis condition is defined using the idea of diagnosis context.By means of NuSMV,a coupled SMV module is constructed,and then the SDGD_CSMV algorithm is designed with the computation temporal logic(CTL) definition of diagnosable property.Finally,the practical applicability within a simple water tank SDG model is demonstrated,which proves the validation of the diagnosable definition and SDGD_CSMV.
出处 《系统工程与电子技术》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2011年第2期390-394,共5页 Systems Engineering and Electronics
关键词 有向图形学 可诊断性 符号模型检测 符号有向图模型 directed graphic diagnosability symbolic model checking signed directed graph model
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Fesq M L. Current fault management trends in NASA's planetary spacecraft[C]// Proc. of IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2009 : 1 - 9.
  • 2Chen Y Y, Wu G W. Fault-tolerant verification platform for systems modeled at high level of abstraction[C]// Proc. of the 1st Annual IEEE Systems Conference, 2007 : 1-7.
  • 3Roerner J M, Dzakowic J,Orsagh R F, et al. Validation and verification of prognostic and health management technologies[C]//Proc. of IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2005 : 3941 - 3947.
  • 4McMillan K L. Symbolic model checking[M]. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1993.
  • 5Cimatti A, Pecheur C, Cavada R. Formal verification of diagnosability via symbolic model checking[C]// Proc. of the 18th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence , 2003:363- 369.
  • 6Williams B C, Nayak P P. A model based approach to reactive self -configuring systems[C]// Proc. of American Association for Artificial Intelligence, 1996:971- 978.
  • 7Nelson S, Pecheur C. New V&V tools for diagnostic modeling environment (DME)[R]. 2nd Gen RLV Program, NRA 8-30/TA-5/Norihrop Grumman/ARC Task 10. Jan, Available as NASA/CR 2002 - 211403, 2002.
  • 8Umeda T, Kuriyama T, O'Shima E, ct al. A graphical approach to cause and effect analysis of chemical processing system[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1980,35(12) : 2379 - 2388.
  • 9杨帆,萧德云.基于SDG的复杂系统故障传播规律分析[J].高技术通讯,2005,15(10):33-36. 被引量:9
  • 10Oyeleye O O, Kramer M A. Qualitative simulation of chemical process systems: Steady-stale analysis[J]. American Institute of Chemical Engineers Journal, 1988,34(9) :1441.

二级参考文献7

  • 1Oyeleye O O, Kramer M A. Qualitative simulation of chemical process systems: steady-state analysis. AIChE Journal, 1988,34:1441.
  • 2Oyeleye O O, Kramer M A. Supplementary material to qualitative simulation of chemical process systems: steady-state analysis. LIPSE-88-036. Cambridge, MA: Department of Chemical Engineering, MIT, 1988.
  • 3Maurya M R, Rengaswamy R, Venkatasubramanian V. A systematic framework for the development and analysis of signed digraphs for chemical processes. 1. algorithms and analysis.Ind Eng Chem Res, 2003,42(20): 4789.
  • 4Maurya M R, Rengaswamy R, Venkatasubramanian V A systematic framework for the development and analysis of signed digraphs for chemical processes. 2. Control loops and flowsheet analysis. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2003,42(20): 4811.
  • 5Iri M, Aoki K, O'shima E, et al. An algorithm for diagnosis of system failures in the chemical process. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 1979,3:489.
  • 6Umeda T, Kuriyama T, O'shima E, et al. A graphical approach to cause and effect analysis of chemical processing systems. Chemical Engineering Science, 1980,35 : 2379.
  • 7张贝克.[D].北京:北京化工大学信息科学与技术学院,2003.

共引文献8

同被引文献44

  • 1陈恒,魏蛟龙,于功敬.“板级电路诊断平台”中TPS开发与执行功能的设计与实现[J].计算机测量与控制,2004,12(8):723-725. 被引量:5
  • 2杨帆,萧德云.SDG建模及其应用的进展[J].控制理论与应用,2005,22(5):767-774. 被引量:44
  • 3LIU H , YU J S , ZHANG P, et al. A review on fault prognostics in integrated health management[C].Proceedings of2009International Conference of Electronic Measurement and Instrument, 2009 ( 4 ) : 267-270.
  • 4王志鹏,吕琛,王自力,等.飞 机PHM演示验证平台设计技术研 究.南京理工大学学报[J].2011, 35 ( S1 ) : 250-255.
  • 5LIU H, YU J S,ZHANG P, et a!.Review on verification and validation technology in integrated health management systemIC]. Proceedings of 2011 International Conference of Electronic Measurement and Instrument, August 2011.
  • 6ROEMER J M, DZAKOWIC J, ORSAGH R F, et al. Validation and verification of prognostic and health management technologies[C]. Proc.of IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2005: 3941-3947.
  • 7MELCHER K J.Meeting thechallenges of exploration systems: health management technologies for aerospace systems with emphasis on propulsion [EB/OL]. http: //gltrs. grc.nasa.gov/reports/2005/TM-2005-214026.pdf, 2008-10-15.
  • 8POLL S,PATTERSON-HINE A, CAMISA J, et al. Advanced diagnostics and prognostics test bed[C].Proceedings of the 18th International Workshop on Principles of Diagnosis, 2007: 178-185.
  • 9SAXENAA, CELAYAJ, SAHAB, et al.On applying the prognostic performance metrics[C]. Annual Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society, 2009: 478-485.
  • 10SAXENA A,CELAYA J , SAHA B. Evaluating algorithm performance metrics tailored for prognosticstC]. Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2008.

引证文献2

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部